| teranet | k done : http://paste.ubuntu.com/23631252/ | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| marcoceppi | teranet: what does MAAS say now? | 00:02 |
| teranet | 3 Ready 3 deployed | 00:02 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: okay, so you've got 3 nodes doing something else? | 00:02 |
| teranet | nope | 00:03 |
| teranet | should I release those too ? | 00:03 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: release those manually then | 00:03 |
| teranet | 1 I know had a hardware issue which I fixed | 00:03 |
| teranet | ok will do | 00:03 |
| teranet | ok now they are all ready | 00:04 |
| teranet | so now I should bootstap again ? | 00:05 |
| teranet | correct ? | 00:07 |
| teranet | ok bootstapping a controller again | 00:12 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: yes, bootstrap and deploy again | 00:12 |
| teranet | for juju-gui can I only deploy the gui to make it work or does the rabbitmq server has to be deployed too? | 00:13 |
| teranet | and mysql sorry forgot that one LOL | 00:13 |
| bdx | teranet: what I would do, when all your maas machines are in a 'ready' state, is `juju add-machine -n 6` | 00:14 |
| bdx | teranet: and just make sure they all deploy successfully without any charms or bundles | 00:14 |
| teranet | hmm ok will do that | 00:14 |
| bdx | then once you verify that, the rest should fall into place | 00:15 |
| teranet | how do I add later more to it ?? does juju does it automaticly once maas say''s they are ready ? | 00:15 |
| bdx | teranet: yea, your `juju status` will show them as 'started' | 00:15 |
| bdx | if you succeed in ^, the rest will work given you have your maas<->juju<->openstack networking aligned | 00:16 |
| teranet | ok will check it | 00:16 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: juju gui doesn't require anything | 00:21 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: it's already deployed by default, just run `juju gui` command | 00:21 |
| teranet | ah ok cool | 00:24 |
| wetoolaguer | Hi everybody, I'm trying to use this bundle https://jujucharms.com/kubernetes-core/ but it's installing the latest version of kubernetes. How can I force it to use an older version? Thanks a lot! | 04:30 |
| stub | skay: ta. I'll test and merge that and add some docs on the charm store publication workaround. | 04:48 |
| stub | skay: released | 06:03 |
| stub | kwmonroe: My issue on that is https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client/issues/103 | 06:28 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| === jamespag` is now known as jamespage | ||
| kjackal | Good morning Juju world! | 08:46 |
| === arosales_ is now known as arosales | ||
| === mup_ is now known as mup | ||
| deanman | Hello, is it possible to auto-scale (regardless the infra) the worker node of a juju kubernetes deployment? | 13:30 |
| deanman | or do you have to create a custom solution that monitors kube workers load and decides whether to request for extra resources (lxd, VMs) using the API of the underlying infra? | 13:30 |
| voidspace | frankban: ping | 13:33 |
| frankban | voidspace: hey | 13:33 |
| voidspace | frankban: hey, hi | 13:33 |
| voidspace | frankban: I have made a change to bundlechanges that I would appreciate you looking at | 13:34 |
| frankban | voidspace: sure | 13:34 |
| voidspace | frankban: https://github.com/juju/bundlechanges/pull/29 | 13:34 |
| voidspace | frankban: we need container placement to honour application constraints | 13:34 |
| voidspace | frankban: this change implements that | 13:34 |
| voidspace | frankban: but the bundlechanges package is new to me :-) | 13:34 |
| voidspace | frankban: when you get a chance anyway | 13:35 |
| frankban | voidspace: looking | 13:36 |
| voidspace | frankban: for context, this is the juju bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1626597 | 13:37 |
| mup | Bug #1626597: Juju ignores constraints set in the bundle and deploys KVMs with default values <4010> <juju:Triaged by mfoord> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1626597> | 13:37 |
| frankban | voidspace: reviewed | 13:53 |
| voidspace | frankban: your analysis of the bug seems correct and passing constraint only rather than application is reasonable, however also <shrug> | 13:54 |
| voidspace | frankban: :-) | 13:54 |
| voidspace | frankban: the new test, when the unit is located to "new", that can't be a container can it? | 13:55 |
| frankban | voidspace: yeah that's the kind of "take it or leave it" suggestion, the branch is good, happy to see that bug discovered | 13:55 |
| voidspace | frankban: a unit can only be located on a container if placement is specified | 13:55 |
| voidspace | frankban: i.e. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "new" :-) | 13:55 |
| frankban | voidspace: it cannot, but since your change touches that it would be nice if that's exercised by a test anyway | 13:55 |
| frankban | voidspace: "new" is a special placement meaning new top level machine | 13:56 |
| voidspace | frankban: right | 13:56 |
| voidspace | frankban: is that an explicit placement? | 13:57 |
| voidspace | frankban: ah, I see it in the code - I will try and work it out | 13:57 |
| frankban | voidspace: which is the default if no placement is specified, but for instance, IIRC, can be used in a multiple placement definition, like to: ["1", "new", "lxd:2"] or similar | 13:57 |
| voidspace | frankban: ah, I see | 13:57 |
| voidspace | frankban: understood | 13:57 |
| frankban | cool | 13:57 |
| voidspace | frankban: I may be able to remove that change - let me check | 13:58 |
| frankban | voidspace: for instance https://github.com/voidspace/bundlechanges/blob/37e0752c3c530d1af168b3a2f90592dc9ce85549/changes_test.go#L286 | 13:58 |
| voidspace | frankban: I added the change there too because I saw a ContainerType | 13:58 |
| voidspace | frankban: yep | 13:59 |
| frankban | voidspace: I don't think that's a bad change, maybe that's required as well | 13:59 |
| voidspace | frankban: right, it might actually be a different bug... | 13:59 |
| voidspace | frankban: ok, I'll add a new test :-) | 13:59 |
| frankban | voidspace: ty | 13:59 |
| voidspace | the new machine should honour application constraints as well | 13:59 |
| frankban | indeed | 14:00 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| CarlFK | juju deploy /home/juser/temp/charm-ubuntu/builds/ubuntu monitor - 27 of those, 25 started, 2 are State:pending | 15:53 |
| CarlFK | it has been like that at least 5 hours. | 15:54 |
| voidspace | frankban: I've added a new test for the case you suggested and made the change to explicitly pass constraints rather than the whole application spec | 16:00 |
| voidspace | frankban: and I'm going to land the change | 16:00 |
| frankban | voidspace: cool thanks | 16:00 |
| voidspace | frankban: thanks for your help | 16:00 |
| voidspace | frankban: is it the usual $$magic$$ to trigger the landing bot on that branch as far as you know? | 16:01 |
| voidspace | frankban: if there's no landing bot I might will have to ask you to land it, as I don't have write access to that repo | 16:03 |
| voidspace | frankban: it's alright, I found the magic... | 16:06 |
| frankban | voidspace: sorry, on call, it's :shipit: probably | 16:07 |
| voidspace | frankban: it is, and it's done - sorry for the noise | 16:07 |
| frankban | np | 16:07 |
| cory_fu | tvansteenburgh: I'm trying to see the delta between the latest and next-most-recent review rev of https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/24 and it seems to include a bunch of stuff that was not specifically changed in the latest rev. Am I missing something? | 16:31 |
| * tvansteenburgh looks | 16:33 | |
| cory_fu | tvansteenburgh: nm, I was reading the diff wrong. It's actually showing the right stuff | 16:36 |
| tvansteenburgh | cory_fu: can you give an example of a something that's displayed but shouldn't be? like, name a file | 16:36 |
| tvansteenburgh | oh okay | 16:36 |
| teranet | ok quick question on juju network ranges | 16:47 |
| teranet | I have my MAAS to use 10.5.x.x/24 but somehow now all of the sudden when I deployed juju charms those charms took 10.0.0.x IP's where do I can see and change that ? | 16:48 |
| marcoceppi | teranet: that's odd, do you have multiple spaces configured? | 17:22 |
| teranet | no not yet | 17:24 |
| teranet | where could I see what spaces / ranges juju uses ? | 17:25 |
| rick_h | teranet: it reads them from maas. You can use list-spaces to see what spaces it sees | 17:25 |
| rick_h | teranet: and show-machine 0 to see details about the machine and what networks it's on | 17:25 |
| teranet | ok that only shows what I configured : http://paste.ubuntu.com/23634617/ | 17:27 |
| teranet | but below you can see my charm's somehow have also 10.0.0 in use ..... | 17:28 |
| rick_h | teranet: adjust the number of the machine to the one that your charm is deployed on | 17:28 |
| teranet | can that be something within the charms ? even when I deployed the yaml none had any network setups in it | 17:28 |
| rick_h | teranet: not really, the charms are handed a machine to run on so it's what maas has for network config and what you've done in Juju to specify deployment constraints | 17:29 |
| teranet | ok updated | 17:29 |
| rick_h | teranet: when you update the pastebin the link url changes | 17:30 |
| rick_h | teranet: so can't see any changes with the other url | 17:30 |
| teranet | http://paste.ubuntu.com/23634623/ | 17:30 |
| teranet | ups :-) there we go | 17:30 |
| rick_h | teranet: does MAAS provide dhcp and is it providing dhcp on both subnets? | 17:33 |
| rick_h | teranet: in Juju the containers should be getting their IP addresses from the MAAS dhcp server | 17:33 |
| teranet | MAAs provides DHCP on the default which is 10.5.100... | 17:35 |
| teranet | but only on eth0 | 17:35 |
| teranet | eth1 is reserved for public only | 17:35 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| === petevg_afk is now known as petevg | ||
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| teranet | any idea ? | 20:39 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| gQuigs | how do I tell juju2.0 to use a specific LXD image? | 23:06 |
| gQuigs | that I installed into LXD manually | 23:06 |
| gQuigs | or do I have no choice and I have to use simplestreams? (the environment this is going in is completely offline, with manually syncing of everythng) | 23:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!