[00:32] I'm getting 407 proxy auth issues in my snap builders: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/298271931/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_xenial_arm64_nextcloud-edge_BUILDING.txt.gz [00:33] kyrofa: Hm, it took a rather long time, so the token probably expired. [00:33] kyrofa: Does it normally take that long? [00:33] It's possible it's running into the prodstack network issue. [00:34] wgrant, hmm, no, indeed [00:35] wgrant, but I just hit it with arm64, ppc64el, and armhf [00:38] kyrofa: Ah, so all the US architectures. So two network performance problems. Are you blocked, or could you wait a couple of hours and try again to see if it's magically resolved? [00:38] wgrant, definitely not blocked, just wanted to report the issue :) [00:39] wgrant, daily builds not happening for a day won't hurt anyone [00:39] kyrofa: Great. Let me know if it's still a problem later -- the main transatlantic link occasionally runs into some trouble. [00:39] wgrant, will do, thanks! [03:46] I assume this channel is just for launchpad code development? is there any irc launchpad support, or only on a browser? [03:47] austin987: This is the support channel. [03:48] wgrant, oh, great! [03:49] wgrant, so, for context, I maintain winetricks, and a user filed a bug asking to fix the launchpad code link from google code to github [03:50] I see you've registered a new import. [03:50] the previous maintainer set that up, he gave me access to LP. I updated what I could, but I can't seem to figure out how to a branch that pulls from github master (previously it was svn on googlecode, with a trunk master) [03:51] it feels a bit like git-svn, where I'm not sure when I should use git or bzr/lp branches/repos [03:51] yes, tried a few things [03:52] https://code.launchpad.net/winetricks looks right -- it shows the imported repository. What it's missing is the bit linking to GitHub, which you can't see unless you drill down the repository itself. Does that match your understanding? [03:53] what do you mean by drill down the repository? [03:54] that does look right to me, looks like last try I got it right :) [03:54] I'll have to ask user to confirm still [03:54] Er, drill down to it, rather. https://code.launchpad.net/winetricks displays much of the same information that https://code.launchpad.net/~winetricks-team/winetricks/+git/winetricks does, but not all of it -- notably the link to the source on GitHub is missing. [03:54] thanks for response / trying anyway [03:54] should there be a link generated by lp? [03:54] i.e., did I miss something to configure? [03:56] https://launchpad.net/winetricks/master shows no linked branch, however [03:56] if I click link it, it asks me to either link to one on launchpad, but if I search for 'winetricks' I get nothing, or I can import a git repo again [03:57] Oh, when I say it's missing, I mean it's missing from our templates :) [03:57] It's not a bug in your configuration -- you've done all you can. [03:57] We just haven't totally integrated the git import details (a new feature) into the project code homepage. [03:57] ah, kk [03:58] I don't know of an existing bug, but if you can file one at https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug it'll be on the list for the next round of git UI tweaks. [03:58] austin987: The https://launchpad.net/winetricks/master bug is already filed, but I forget the number. We will probably hide that section of the page for Git. [03:58] wgrant, okay, thanks [03:59] if you find it later and I'm still around, please send me the link [04:00] wgrant, any tags on the link bug? [04:01] austin987: Not at this stage -- we'll add them. [04:01] wgrant, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1650109 [04:01] Ubuntu bug 1650109 in Launchpad itself "Provide a link to imported git projects original source" [Undecided,New] === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [04:02] austin987: Thanks. [04:03] np [04:03] thank you === JanC is now known as Guest52303 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [13:08] hi, I searched the net a bit but was not sure if it is possible (and how) to request to enable s390x and PowerPC processor arch pkg building? (it says: "Some architectures are restricted and may only be enabled or disabled by administrators.") [13:09] pevma: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion [13:10] thank you [13:10] pevma: but it's only permitted for Canonical employees [13:10] aha [13:10] ok [13:10] that answered my question :) [13:10] pevma: so if you're not one then I'm afraid we have to say no, because we don't have good enough sandboxing on those architectures yet [13:10] understood... i am not [13:10] when we do then it will be allowed [13:11] ok thanks - any ETA [13:11] ? [13:11] needs deployment of a new cloud first [13:11] don't have a specific ETA as yet but s390x at least will hopefully be fairly soon [13:12] powerpc will be best-effort I guess, given https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2016-December/002274.html [13:12] though it may still be worth it for supporting stable releases [13:12] pevma, note that ppc64el should be available as self service (at least i was under impression that it has become a generally available arch) [13:13] understood [13:13] thanks cjwatson [13:13] ppc64el is self-service, yes [13:13] xnox: yes ppc64el i have enabled ya [13:19] i have one more question :) - [13:19] i have a package that i need to have enabled in /etc/pbuilderrc - > "USENETWORK=yes" during build because of pip version dependencies ... [13:19] What is the best way to do that (if possible) in PPA. I am guessing using the rules file? [13:19] There's no way to do that [13:19] understood [13:19] thanks [13:19] You need to package the pip dependencies in question as packages you can build-depend on, or (if absolutely necessary) bundle them [13:20] i can try looking into that yes [13:20] good idea === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [16:24] wgrant: this is still happening consistently: OOPS-bf417f9b83b1c83c27395d1e77e44b40 [16:24] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-bf417f9b83b1c83c27395d1e77e44b40 [16:25] wgrant: should i file a bug somewhere? [20:52] tvansteenburgh: Yep, please file a bug at https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug, including the OOPS ID. [21:11] hello? === cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: LP intermittently unavailable 23:00-0:00 UTC tonight for essential firewall maintenance | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [21:58] Some cronned services will be stopped half an hour or so beforehand, so e.g. PPA publishing, builds, etc. will be delayed somewhat. [21:59] eesh that means I only have an hour to upload nginx o.O [22:00] teward: Uploads will generally be queued, unless they hit one of the short intervals when a firewall is actually being replaced. [22:00] teward: But they'll either just obviously fail or be queued, at any rate. [22:00] indeed. [22:00] gee, application not available due to firewall maintenance ... the 90s are calling, cjwatson :) [22:01] cjwatson: though i've just got the upload in now, so hopefully it gets built :) [22:02] DLange: Only so much you can do when the route to your database goes away ;-) [22:03] yeah, everybody can have redundant paths ... where's the fun in doing that? :) [22:05] Not something I have any control over, I'm afraid [22:08] yeah, good luck with seeing your DB again in ~two hours and getting to sleep at a reasonable time! [22:10] "intermittently" [22:10] the actual outages should only be a minute or so, that's just the total slot sysadmins have allocated for the whole lot [22:12] cjwatson: i guess I'm lucky - my upload got in, and built already it seems xD [22:12] (also, I'm just doing initial communication, I've no intention of staying up for it) [22:13] I'll be here, though. [22:16] well, nn cjwatson and good luck wgrant then :) [22:16] * DLange is off for the night, too [22:29] uh, wily builds no more, but vivid yes? [22:29] sergio-br2: wily is EOL; vivid is still weird special child because of phone, but is EOL otherwise [22:29] sergio-br2: you should not be building stuff on vivid generally [22:30] ah, ubuntu phone [22:30] humm [22:30] should I disable vivid in my PPAs then? [22:30] yes, i would say so [22:30] Yes. [22:31] the thing is, you always find users using old ubuntu [22:31] doesn't mean they are supported [22:46] there should be an option to disable a release in the ppa or recipes massively [22:46] the libretro ppa has something like 70 or more recipes T.T [22:48] sergio-br2: You can use an API script to do that easily. [23:01] really? [23:01] launchpadlib ?