[01:25] <lazyPower> stokachu - i know its late, i discovered this and submit a patch https://github.com/conjure-up/spells/pull/23   LMK if i broke the spell or anything... I'm not super familiar with what the ExposeResult method does.
[02:06] <stokachu> lazyPower: o/
[02:06] <lazyPower> \o
[02:06] <stokachu> lazyPower: trying to work through deis and helm
[02:06] <stokachu> looking at your pr now
[02:06] <lazyPower> ahhhhhhh :D
[02:07] <lazyPower> that makes me excite
[02:07] <lazyPower> i volunteer to pilot your spells
[02:07] <stokachu> :D
[02:07] <stokachu> lazyPower: i need a good name for it though
[02:08] <stokachu> ive got 2 spells named Canonical Kubernetes and Kubernetes Core
[02:08] <lazyPower> stokachu - why not just use the software name?  conjure-up deis
[02:08] <stokachu> ah i like that too
[02:08] <stokachu> sold
[02:08]  * lazyPower hands stokachu a nicely wrapped deis with a bow
[02:08] <lazyPower> that'll be 59.99
[02:08] <stokachu> lol
[02:15] <stokachu> lazyPower: small comment on the PR
[02:15] <lazyPower> ack, taking a look
[02:15] <stokachu> exposeResult just prints to the summary screen at the end of conjure-up
[02:15] <lazyPower> actually, is there a way i can test a spell locally?
[02:15] <lazyPower> disclaimer, in true lazy fashion, i have not read the docs
[02:15] <stokachu> lazyPower: yea if you want to clone the spells github
[02:16] <stokachu> and just do conjure-up -d path/to/spell
[02:16] <stokachu> or cd into the spell dir and do conjure-up -d .
[02:16] <lazyPower> aahhh ok
[02:16] <lazyPower> thanks for the tip
[02:16] <stokachu> np
[02:16] <lazyPower> i'l give it a run before i resub
[02:16] <stokachu> cool man
[02:18] <stokachu> lazyPower: so with deis we've been trying to avoid installing binaries on the users host system
[02:18] <stokachu> it's not a hard rule, but one other option we thought of was deploy an ubuntu charm
[02:18] <stokachu> and installing deis/helm on that
[02:18] <stokachu> or does it really make more sense for those things to be on the users system locally?
[02:18] <lazyPower> that seems expensive
[02:19] <lazyPower> a unit in cloud $X for just 1 bin
[02:19] <stokachu> are they just binaries?
[02:19] <lazyPower> i'll hvae to take another look
[02:19]  * stokachu hasn't looked to deep in them yet
[02:19] <lazyPower> but i thinkt hats the case
[02:19] <stokachu> if they are just like go compiled binaries i think that should just be fine to put locally
[02:19] <stokachu> like we do with the kubectl script
[02:20] <lazyPower> yeah
[02:20] <lazyPower> that ^
[02:20] <lazyPower> its just like kubectl
[02:20] <stokachu> cool ill do that then
[02:21] <stokachu> i got the paas itch
[02:21] <stokachu> hopefully it'll make a comeback
[02:48] <lazyPower> stokachu - you're in good company, and the deis stack is pretty nice.
[03:13] <lazyPower> stokachu oh hey, have you seen the new debug action on the kubernetes charm?
[03:14] <lazyPower> debugging-info ++
[10:30] <deanman> Good morning, could anyone check the following http://paste.ubuntu.com/23637511/ and let me know if their shell gets also frozen? Not sure whether it's a bug or my setup.
[12:08] <narindergupta> how can i install juju-core of 1.25.5 as 1.25.6 is having issue on trusty?
[12:41] <deanman> narindergupta, Try this, could work -> `apt-get install «pkg»=«version»`
[12:43] <narindergupta> deanman, no unfortunately it does not exist. I tried all combination. So i ended up download using wget and use dpkg -i but now need to upload 1.25.5 tools only. so figuring it out juju bootstrap command to upload old version of tool.
[12:43] <narindergupta> deanman, do you have that handy?
[12:45] <deanman> narindergupta, there is a way to explicitly state the tools you need to upload during bootstrap.
[12:46] <deanman> `juju bootstrap --agent-version` https://jujucharms.com/docs/1.25/commands#sync-tools. Is that what you want ?
[12:47] <deanman> or maybe this `--upload-tools (= false)` is more pertinent?
[12:48] <narindergupta> deanman, thanks i think thats what i was looking for
[12:53] <mgz> narindergupta: you probably don't need --upload-tools, jsut give the --no-auto-upgrade on bootstrap with the 1.25.5 client
[12:54] <narindergupta> mgz, ok will try that thanks
[12:55] <mgz> also, what's your issue with .6? tls version?
[12:59] <narindergupta> mgz, correct thats the issue
[12:59] <narindergupta> mgz, i wrote this issue but status is not won't fix
[13:00] <narindergupta> mgz, also with maas 2.1 and juju 2.x i am finding it uses lxdbr0 which is private network for lxd so somehow all of my deployments with current codes are failing.
[13:01] <narindergupta> i have stable with juju 1.25.6 and maas 1.9.x which fails due to tls issue
[13:01] <narindergupta> and maas 2.1 with juju 2.0 failed because ips used in lxd machines are from lxdbr0
[14:26] <gQuigs> can I manually specify an LXD image to bootstrap Juju with?
[14:26] <gQuigs> *local only LXD image
[14:34] <gQuigs> or do I have to use simplestreams?
[17:21] <vmorris> bootstrapping into a manual provider, what's the ideal way to setup the lxd bridge on the machines so that they'll bridge out to the physical network?
[17:22] <vmorris> ideally there would be (and maybe already exists) a way to specify which interface on the machine I want lxdbr0 to bridge to (no NAT), and a pool of IP addresses from which new units would pick from
[17:23] <vmorris> this was all easy to do with MAAS as the provider, but i cannot use it for this currently
[18:11] <Teranet> Good morning everyone
[21:32] <cory_fu> tvansteenburgh: You still around to take a look at my BT PR?  https://github.com/juju-solutions/bundletester/pull/80
[21:53] <sf> I need a help on this one
[21:53] <sf> Is there a way to get the num-units deployed/added in my charms code?
[21:54] <sf> Either juju deploy --n <num> or juju add-unit -n <num>
[21:54] <sf> I want to dynamically fetch the number of units added in my charm code
[21:54] <sf> How can I get that info?
[21:57] <cory_fu> sf: Your charm will have a peer relation to itself, and you can count the number of units on the peer relation with relation-list
[22:05] <sf> @cory_fu, thanks. How do I go it programmatically in python.  charm/hooksenv.py does not have relation-list function
[22:05] <sf> @cory_fu, thanks. How do I get it programmatically in python.  charm/hooksenv.py does not have relation-list function
[22:07] <cory_fu> sf: hookenv.related_units(rel_id)
[22:09] <sf> @cory_fu. Thanks
[22:09] <cory_fu> sf: np!
[23:28] <sf> @cory_fu. it works but it doesn't include itself. say you have 3 units, the peer relation returns only 2
[23:29] <cory_fu> sf: That's true.  It only counts the number of peers, so if you want the total, you have to add 1 for yourself
[23:34] <tvansteenburgh> cory_fu: still around?
[23:34] <cory_fu> tvansteenburgh: Yep
[23:38] <tvansteenburgh> cory_fu: do you need a release of this bundletester patch?
[23:39] <cory_fu> tvansteenburgh: It would help with my debugging, yes.
[23:40] <tvansteenburgh> cory_fu: done
[23:40] <cory_fu> Thanks!
[23:41] <tvansteenburgh> cory_fu: np, going afk, text me if you need another one
[23:41] <cory_fu> tvansteenburgh: Much obliged!