[00:01] * compdoc passes dasjoe the calamine lotion [00:02] :) === jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-out [01:58] Well, I wouldn't have predicted this but I've just installed Ubuntu Server. [02:04] If I'm reading this right it took just 1.3 GB on disk. [02:05] (plus swap, which doesn't count) [02:05] ball, sounds about right [02:05] Awesome. === JanC_ is now known as JanC === nchambers is now known as chambs === amoralej|off is now known as amoralej === med_ is now known as Guest67717 === ForgottenOne is now known as Mis-anthrope === BioKee is now known as Guest97620 === tinwood is now known as tinwood_holiday [12:30] powersj: on bug 1540323, I'm not sure I follow. The source package does need removing, and we need to create the binary from the seeds instead. [12:30] bug 1540323 in ubuntu-virt (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-virt is not generated from seeds" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1540323 [12:30] (or get rid of the binary package entirely; that needs further checking) [12:42] powersj: I replied to bug 1649729 [12:42] bug 1649729 in ntp (Ubuntu) "ntpd startup failures under xenial" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1649729 === BioKee is now known as Guest96652 === amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch === amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej === spammy is now known as Guest81153 === Guest81153 is now known as spammy [15:10] rbasak: re: ubuntu-virt, so you expect the binary to exist, but to be generated by a different source package? [15:14] I really doubt if I need to mirror universe and multiverse for my servers [15:16] powersj: right. Actually I'm not sure if the binary should exist, but if it should, it should be generated via a seed through src:ubuntu-meta I think. [15:16] (which is semi-auto-updated from the seeds) [15:17] rbasak: ok thanks, I was doing old bug triage and didn't quite understand if there was still an action. I see you added it to the backlog, so I think we are good then :) === noxs_ is now known as noxs === giraffe is now known as Guest17281 === chambs is now known as nchambers [18:26] hello everyone, i am running ubuntu novalxd openstack [18:26] and i imported an image from a remote host [18:26] i can see it when i go into the compute container and do "lxc image list" [18:27] but it is not present in the horizon ui [18:27] what is the way to make it visible in horizon? [18:27] are you "allowed" to mix the novalxd with normal lxd like that? [18:35] sarnold: oh i didnt realize they had different commands [18:36] can i do remote add with nova lxd? [18:36] hasenov: the usual lxd image store doesn't have any concept of tenants or 'owners' -- it's nice and simple :) -- but the novalxd thing is going to use glance for images, which do have owners, and so on.. [18:37] so I suspect when you step out of the openstack tooling, you're probably going to have trouble integrating with novalxd; and when you step out of the lxd tooling, you're going to have trouble integrating with openstack [18:40] my situation is that someone just shared an lxc image with me from their repo and i downloaded it, i believe my only solution is to create a tar out of it and create new image through horizon ui? [18:40] that sounds plausible; there might be better choices but I can't think of anything off-hand [19:16] so i exported the image and create new one in horizon, and looks like through openstack the instance wouldn't start [19:16] but when starting with lxc it starts up fine [19:17] WARNING nova.compute.manager [-] [instance: 9cb756c9-a39c-42fe-8ce3-c069f8c86b1c] Instance shutdown by itself. Calling the stop API. Current vm_state: active, current task_state: None, original DB power_state: 4, current VM power_state: 4 [19:18] is what is printed out in the nova var log === amoralej is now known as amoralej|off [20:36] how would i be able to get a novalxd image from a remote Image Location? [20:36] can i use images.linuxcontainers.org? [20:51] I have just been given responsiblity to manage a rack mount server with Ubuntu. I am looking for suggestion of how to manage [20:52] it, especially for being up/down. I will have access to ssh. It will have mysql, apache and another socket based app. [20:52] How to know status without looking? What tools. Any references are great. [20:54] 1) You will gradually want to get some configuration management in place, such as Puppet or Ansible [20:54] 2) Icinga 2 is not a bad choice for monitoring, to be able to see what is up or not, etc. [20:55] GrandPa-G: ^^ [20:56] Or wait, are we just talking about one server now? In that case I guess it might be more effencience to use a hosted solution for monitoring, such as Pingdom or Monitis. [21:03] One caveat is I am told no $ to spend. Just one server, not high usage, just don't want to have to monitor until something is going bad. [21:06] GrandPa-G: If we take Pingdom as an example you would probably me able to get away with their Starter tier for $15 a month. Surely spending that small amount of money must be preferable to you spending a non-trivial amount of work time? [21:08] If I were in charge, I would agree. It just that any funding is a big deal. [21:11] ...and your time is free? [21:14] actually it is on this project [22:25] my server brings a duplicate address up on eth2 after every reboot, are there any logs as to why this happens? [22:25] i have 192.168.1.2/25 and after the reboot theres also a 192.168.1.2/32 , why? [22:26] DK2: What does your configuration looks like? [22:27] auto eth2 [22:27] iface eth2 inet static [22:27] address 192.168.1.2 [22:27] netmask 255.255.255.128 [22:27] thats all.. lol [22:29] That's all, no gateway, no DNS, no other interfaces configured? [22:29] yes its not needed in this case [22:30] Not even the loopback adapter configured? [22:31] there is [22:31] but not for eth2... [22:31] eth2 ist just for interal access to some servers [22:31] Guess why the loopback is named loopback and not eth2. :P [22:31] ya well the loopback adapter is there :P [22:32] i just dont know where that mysterious duplicate /32 comes from [22:37] Trying to add a second disk to my ubuntu server.. ran fdisk -l and the one I am adding is /dev/sdb I want to mount it to /storage. In fstab I put in /dev/sdb /storage ext4 defaults 1 3 However, I get this error "Can't find ext4 filesystem... does it need to be formatted or something?? [22:38] k2gremlin: yes, you should partition it first, and then make a filesystem in the partition [22:38] Do I need to use the mkfs.ext4 command? [22:38] k2gremlin: you need to create a partition on it, like sdb1, and create a filesystem on sdb1 afterwards. [22:38] Then, you can mount it. [22:40] bekks, should it be primary or extended? [22:40] k2gremlin: Doesnt matter actually. [22:41] Will mkfs.ext4 actually refuse to work on a raw block device? Let's see [22:42] Not, it will work fine on whatever block device. [22:43] Yeah, just tested: /dev/zd96: Linux rev 1.0 ext4 filesystem data, UUID=8a0923ec-5575-4234-8ddc-78d0ecb67a30 (extents) (large files) (huge files) [23:02] bekks, thanks.. got it working great :) [23:25] nacc: just saw your comment on bug 1436558. I haven't proposed a merge yet because I want to see what's happening with heimdal in debian (heimdal 7 RC just got uploaded to unstable)... if I'm going to be adding back heimdal support anyway, I'd kind of rather not merge in the current state with heimdal disabled [23:25] bug 1436558 in openldap (Ubuntu) "package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/ldap/ldap.conf', which is different from other instances of package libldap-2.4-2:amd64" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1436558 [23:25] tarpman: ah ok! thanks! [23:26] nacc: I understand it's a nasty bug, but it's also been around for a decade or so :) [23:26] tarpman: 100% ack on that, mostly a note to myself as i triage [23:26] sure [23:40] meh my apache stopped serving my vhosts on a 14.04 to 16.04 upgrade