[00:01]  * compdoc passes dasjoe the calamine lotion
[00:02] <dasjoe> :)
[01:58] <ball> Well, I wouldn't have predicted this but I've just installed Ubuntu Server.
[02:04] <ball> If I'm reading this right it took just 1.3 GB on disk.
[02:05] <ball> (plus swap, which doesn't count)
[02:05] <pmatulis> ball, sounds about right
[02:05] <ball> Awesome.
[12:30] <rbasak> powersj: on bug 1540323, I'm not sure I follow. The source package does need removing, and we need to create the binary from the seeds instead.
[12:30] <rbasak> (or get rid of the binary package entirely; that needs further checking)
[12:42] <rbasak> powersj: I replied to bug 1649729
[15:10] <powersj> rbasak: re: ubuntu-virt, so you expect the binary to exist, but to be generated by a different source package?
[15:14] <rizonz> I really doubt if I need to mirror universe and multiverse for my servers
[15:16] <rbasak> powersj: right. Actually I'm not sure if the binary should exist, but if it should, it should be generated via a seed through src:ubuntu-meta I think.
[15:16] <rbasak> (which is semi-auto-updated from the seeds)
[15:17] <powersj> rbasak: ok thanks, I was doing old bug triage and didn't quite understand if there was still an action. I see you added it to the backlog, so I think we are good then :)
[18:26] <hasenov> hello everyone, i am running ubuntu novalxd openstack
[18:26] <hasenov> and i imported an image from a remote host
[18:26] <hasenov> i can see it when i go into the compute container and do "lxc image list"
[18:27] <hasenov> but it is not present in the horizon ui
[18:27] <hasenov> what is the way to make it visible in horizon?
[18:27] <sarnold> are you "allowed" to mix the novalxd with normal lxd like that?
[18:35] <hasenov> sarnold: oh i didnt realize they had different commands
[18:36] <hasenov> can i do remote add with nova lxd?
[18:36] <sarnold> hasenov: the usual lxd image store doesn't have any concept of tenants or 'owners' -- it's nice and simple :) -- but the novalxd thing is going to use glance for images, which do have owners, and so on..
[18:37] <sarnold> so I suspect when you step out of the openstack tooling, you're probably going to have trouble integrating with novalxd; and when you step out of the lxd tooling, you're going to have trouble integrating with openstack
[18:40] <hasenov> my situation is that someone just shared an lxc image with me from their repo and i downloaded it, i believe my only solution is to create a tar out of it and create new image through horizon ui?
[18:40] <sarnold> that sounds plausible; there might be better choices but I can't think of anything off-hand
[19:16] <hasenov> so i exported the image and create new one in horizon, and looks like through openstack the instance wouldn't start
[19:16] <hasenov> but when starting with lxc it starts up fine
[19:17] <hasenov> WARNING nova.compute.manager [-] [instance: 9cb756c9-a39c-42fe-8ce3-c069f8c86b1c] Instance shutdown by itself. Calling the stop API. Current vm_state: active, current task_state: None, original DB power_state: 4, current VM power_state: 4
[19:18] <hasenov> is what is printed out in the nova var log
[20:36] <hasenov> how would i be able to get a novalxd image from a remote Image Location?
[20:36] <hasenov> can i use images.linuxcontainers.org?
[20:51] <GrandPa-G> I have just been given responsiblity to manage a rack mount server with Ubuntu. I am looking for suggestion of how to manage
[20:52] <GrandPa-G> it, especially for being up/down. I will have access to ssh. It will have mysql, apache and another socket based app.
[20:52] <GrandPa-G> How to know status without looking? What tools. Any references are great.
[20:54] <andol> 1) You will gradually want to get some configuration management in place, such as Puppet or Ansible
[20:54] <andol> 2) Icinga 2 is not a bad choice for monitoring, to be able to see what is up or not, etc.
[20:55] <andol> GrandPa-G: ^^
[20:56] <andol> Or wait, are we just talking about one server now? In that case I guess it might be more effencience to use a hosted solution for monitoring, such as Pingdom or Monitis.
[21:03] <GrandPa-G> One caveat is I am told no $ to spend. Just one server, not high usage, just don't want to have to monitor until something is going bad.
[21:06] <andol> GrandPa-G: If we take Pingdom as an example you would probably me able to get away with their Starter tier for $15 a month.  Surely spending that small amount of money must be preferable to you spending a non-trivial amount of work time?
[21:08] <GrandPa-G> If I were in charge, I would agree. It just that any funding is a big deal.
[21:11] <andol> ...and your time is free?
[21:14] <GrandPa-G> actually it is on this project
[22:25] <DK2> my server brings a duplicate address up on eth2 after every reboot, are there any logs as to why this happens?
[22:25] <DK2> i have 192.168.1.2/25 and after the reboot theres also a 192.168.1.2/32 , why?
[22:26] <bekks> DK2: What does your configuration looks like?
[22:27] <DK2> auto eth2
[22:27] <DK2> iface eth2 inet static
[22:27] <DK2>   address 192.168.1.2
[22:27] <DK2>   netmask 255.255.255.128
[22:27] <DK2> thats all.. lol
[22:29] <dasjoe> That's all, no gateway, no DNS, no other interfaces configured?
[22:29] <DK2> yes its not needed in this case
[22:30] <bekks> Not even the loopback adapter configured?
[22:31] <DK2> there is
[22:31] <DK2> but not for eth2...
[22:31] <DK2> eth2 ist just for interal access to some servers
[22:31] <bekks> Guess why the loopback is named loopback and not eth2. :P
[22:31] <DK2> ya well the loopback adapter is there :P
[22:32] <DK2> i just dont know where that mysterious duplicate /32 comes from
[22:37] <k2gremlin> Trying to add a second disk to my ubuntu server.. ran fdisk -l and the one I am adding is /dev/sdb  I want to mount it to /storage. In fstab I put in /dev/sdb /storage ext4 defaults 1 3 However, I get this error "Can't find ext4 filesystem... does it need to be formatted or something??
[22:38] <tarpman> k2gremlin: yes, you should partition it first, and then make a filesystem in the partition
[22:38] <k2gremlin> Do I need to use the mkfs.ext4 command?
[22:38] <bekks> k2gremlin: you need to create a partition on it, like sdb1, and create a filesystem on sdb1 afterwards.
[22:38] <bekks> Then, you can mount it.
[22:40] <k2gremlin> bekks, should it be primary or extended?
[22:40] <bekks> k2gremlin: Doesnt matter actually.
[22:41] <dasjoe> Will mkfs.ext4 actually refuse to work on a raw block device? Let's see
[22:42] <bekks> Not, it will work fine on whatever block device.
[22:43] <dasjoe> Yeah, just tested: /dev/zd96: Linux rev 1.0 ext4 filesystem data, UUID=8a0923ec-5575-4234-8ddc-78d0ecb67a30 (extents) (large files) (huge files)
[23:02] <k2gremlin> bekks, thanks.. got it working great :)
[23:25] <tarpman> nacc: just saw your comment on bug 1436558. I haven't proposed a merge yet because I want to see what's happening with heimdal in debian (heimdal 7 RC just got uploaded to unstable)... if I'm going to be adding back heimdal support anyway, I'd kind of rather not merge in the current state with heimdal disabled
[23:25] <nacc> tarpman: ah ok! thanks!
[23:26] <tarpman> nacc: I understand it's a nasty bug, but it's also been around for a decade or so :)
[23:26] <nacc> tarpman: 100% ack on that, mostly a note to myself as i triage
[23:26] <tarpman> sure
[23:40] <rizonz> meh my apache stopped serving my vhosts on a 14.04 to 16.04 upgrade