[13:48] <slashd> for sru, could you please take action on "os-prober" [1.70ubuntu3.2] waiting in the Xenial upload queue (importance : CRITICAL) in order for the pkg to be available in -proposed for testing. This fix a missing dependency in 1.70ubuntu3.1 fix that solve a possible risk of FS corruption to some users  (LP: #1579609)
[13:48] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1579609 in os-prober (Ubuntu Xenial) "os-prober bug resulting in possible FS corruption" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1579609
[14:08] <slashd> cyphermox, ^ do we want os-prober 1.70ubuntu3.1 to land in -updates without the grub-common dependency ?
[14:13] <slashd> cyphermox, and then 3.2 will introduce the missing dependency via another sru process (which may take days/weeks) ? or we jump right away to 3.2 to not have a 3.1 without the grub-common dependency ?
[14:41] <cyphermox> slashd: os-prober ...3.1 is already in proposed, the SRU can just go on top and should definitely not be verification-done for now
[14:41] <cyphermox> also, you're probably on the wrong channel if you expect people to do things about this SRU other than verifying it
[14:42] <slashd> cyphermox, ok so what is the next step ?
[14:43] <cyphermox> accepting the new SRU on top of this
[14:43] <slashd> cyphermox, ok then 3.1 will never make it to -updates ?
[14:44] <cyphermox> it certainly shouldn't since it's broken
[14:44] <slashd> cyphermox, yes, this is why I ask, I want to make sure it won't happen
[14:44] <slashd> cyphermox, which channel is appropriate for that then ? #ubuntu-devel ?
[14:47] <elio_manuel> Hello guys, this is the channel where we can chat about a problem that i'm facing with ubuntu 16.10 related to games and some flickering?
[14:48] <slashd> cyphermox, I re-post in #ubuntu-devel
[14:49] <slashd> tks cyphermox
=== scottt is now known as Guest37114
=== slashd- is now known as slashd
=== bgray is now known as bgray_
=== bgray_ is now known as bgray