| nacc | jgrimm: check now? | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| nacc | jgrimm: on nspr | 00:14 |
| === tsimonq2alt is now known as tsimonq2 | ||
| nacc | infinity: fwiw, i think i figured out the horde-crypt failure. It's actually testing things correctly (using the gpg binary and setting up its own test-internal gpg keys). But it's using deprecated/ignored options to gpg :) | 01:02 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: oh i didn't realize powerpc was going away quite that much | 01:19 |
| nacc | wtf gpg | 01:20 |
| nacc | infinity: have to set GPG_TTY=$(tty) and pass '--pinentry-mode loopback' and the tests seem to work | 01:20 |
| jgrimm | nacc, worked, thanks! | 01:22 |
| nacc | jgrimm: great, sorry about that | 01:25 |
| jgrimm | no worries at all! | 01:29 |
| === Unit193 is now known as JackFrost | ||
| nacc | infinity: figured out most of them! gpg changed the output and the tests were parsing it, as well.. | 01:52 |
| tsimonq2 | Ok, deciding to pick up bug 1516454 again. | 02:05 |
| ubottu | bug 1516454 in gnumeric (Ubuntu) "Gnumeric menu -> Help -> About Gnumeric -> "License" or "Credits" buttons don't work" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1516454 | 02:05 |
| tsimonq2 | So I'm curious if anything stands out to anybody, I trid the obvious solution of editing the GTK property as I believe it was missing something? | 02:05 |
| Umeaboy | Hi! | 03:00 |
| Umeaboy | Who's the maintainer of the mkvtoolnix package in Ubuntu 16.10? | 03:00 |
| Umeaboy | Hmmmmmmmmmm. I think I better take this in #ubuntu-app-devel. | 03:01 |
| sarnold | isn't that channel for the phones? | 03:02 |
| sarnold | given the long list of debian version numbers here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mkvtoolnix/+publishinghistory I suspect there's no one at ubuntu that 'tends' to this package -- it mostly appears to be pulled in from debian unchanged, until toolchain issues cause rebuilds | 03:03 |
| Umeaboy | It has only been pushed to the development release of Ubuntu. | 03:04 |
| Umeaboy | Seems odd since 9.6.0 is a stable release and not a development release. | 03:05 |
| Umeaboy | That's my idea of stable anyhow. | 03:05 |
| mwhudson | stgraber, slangasek: i finally filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/snappy/+bug/1651936 | 03:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1651936 in Snappy "autopkgtests fail on ppc64el" [Undecided,New] | 03:42 |
| sarnold | are all the failures coming from expect, and are they all password-related? | 03:47 |
| sarnold | oh I guess not, there's also this: | 03:48 |
| sarnold | mesg: ttyname failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device | 03:48 |
| sarnold | but I suspect that's the usual glibc-vs-kernel disagreement about tty devices in filesystem namespaces | 03:48 |
| sarnold | also tests/main/chattr -- that's an odd one | 03:49 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: yup | 05:13 |
| mwhudson | sarnold: ah hah, go would be particularly susceptible to that | 06:57 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: thanks - got an autoemail from launchpad to say you have "fix released" our merge request for lp:ubuntu-cdimage | 08:47 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: np, did you get my yesterday's message about the image builds failing? | 08:52 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: hmm - have looked. nothing :( | 08:53 |
| sil2100 | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-budgie/zesty/ | 08:54 |
| sil2100 | We might be missing some enabling of this project on livefs builders | 08:54 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: hello! Are you still around today by any chance? | 08:55 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: might be a bit hard to get things done, a lot of people are on holidays already | 08:57 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: ah - yes. with xmas on the weekend ... good excuse to have a very long break! | 08:58 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: what do you need? | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: hello! We have enabled a new ubuntu flavor in cdimage, ubuntu-budgie - it seems the builds are failing since there's still something missing in the builders to enable that? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-budgie/zesty/daily-live-20161221.log | 10:57 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: do you know about the production config branch on nusakan? | 10:57 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: I see it but never 'used' it before I think | 10:58 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: that's what you need to edit :) | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | Ah :) | 10:58 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: did anyone create the livefs objects in LP? | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: I don't think so... | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: is this also something I can do, or does require some special powers? | 10:59 |
| cjwatson | You should be able to; let me just look it up | 10:59 |
| cjwatson | lp-shell production devel -> lp.livefses.new(owner='/~ubuntu-cdimage', distro_series='/ubuntu/zesty', name='ubuntu-budgie') | 11:00 |
| cjwatson | doesn't need any special powers since you're just trying to build it for amd64 and i386, so no devirtualisation needed | 11:00 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: ok, let me try running this then, thanks :) | 11:01 |
| cjwatson | then add it to livefs-launchpad in the production config branch | 11:01 |
| sil2100 | And I'll edit the production config then | 11:01 |
| sil2100 | Thanks for the pointers! | 11:01 |
| cjwatson | and make sure to pull that onto nusakan of course | 11:01 |
| === scottt is now known as Guest18861 | ||
| ginggs | matplotlib, python-stdlib-extensions and pandas show test regressions in lmfit-py on armhf - where lmfit-py is not installable since python-pandas removal. What needs to be done to let them migrate? | 14:44 |
| jabowery | A July Debian bugfix has not made it into xenial updates. The advice at the launchpad unassigned bug tracking comments is: A thing the maintainer perhaps could do would be to create a launchpad mirror of the sourceforge repo maxima's code is kept in - and then to initiate a nightly build ppa for maxima. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maxima/+bug/1602941/comments/8 | 15:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1602941 in maxima (Ubuntu Xenial) "Draw cannot be loaded in 16.04 (Repackage needed since gcl has changed?)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 15:45 |
| jabowery | How does one go about identifying or becoming that "maintainer"? | 15:45 |
| tumbleweed | ubuntu packages usually don't have maintainers, as such | 15:47 |
| tumbleweed | I'd SRU that patch into xenial | 15:47 |
| jabowery | What does SRU stand for? | 15:48 |
| tumbleweed | !sru | 15:48 |
| ubottu | Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 15:48 |
| tumbleweed | can you find the patch that fixes the bug? | 15:48 |
| dobey | it looks like 5.37.2-9 could be synced from debian to xenial-updates (and maybe yakkety-updates), as -8 is what's in ubuntu | 15:51 |
| dobey | * Bug fix: "maxima do not load the draw package.", thanks to Renato | 15:52 |
| dobey | Alvarez Nodarse (Closes: #803251). rework sys:*load-pathname* patch | 15:52 |
| tumbleweed | it's a different -8 | 15:52 |
| dobey | ? | 15:52 |
| tumbleweed | I mean, yakkety is already fixed | 15:53 |
| cjwatson | maxima/xenial == maxima/yakkety | 15:53 |
| tumbleweed | I've never heard of syncing into a stable -updates | 15:53 |
| cjwatson | *zesty* has a different -8 | 15:53 |
| dobey | right | 15:53 |
| tumbleweed | oh, yes, that's what I was thinking | 15:53 |
| dobey | yakkety and xenial have the same package | 15:53 |
| cjwatson | it's certainly *possible* to copy into a stable -proposed and have it verified, but it wouldn't suit the tools very well because it wouldn't refer to a Launchpad bug | 15:54 |
| cjwatson | so verification wouldn't work right | 15:54 |
| cjwatson | better to just cherry-pick into 5.37.2-8ubuntu1, even if that ends up essentially identical to 5.37.2-9 | 15:54 |
| * tumbleweed has a poke at it | 15:55 | |
| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| jabowery | So I take it I should pursue a different procedure than submitting an SRU on the debian fix to maxima? | 16:57 |
| nacc | jabowery: SRU is not a debian thing | 16:58 |
| nacc | jabowery: SRU is an ubuntu thing :) | 16:58 |
| nacc | jabowery: oh i see what you were saying -- the right approach is to SRU the debian change to ubuntu's packages where relevant, but I think tumbleweed may be doing it | 16:58 |
| jabowery | Great! | 16:58 |
| tumbleweed | I did it. jabowery will you test it once it's published? | 17:00 |
| tumbleweed | subscribe to the bug now, if you haven't | 17:00 |
| jabowery | Sure I'll test it. I'm subscribed to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maxima/+bug/1602941 | 17:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1602941 in maxima (Ubuntu Xenial) "Draw cannot be loaded in 16.04 (Repackage needed since gcl has changed?)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 17:01 |
| jabowery | I presume that means I'll receive an email notifying me it has been published. I've just received an email saying "** Changed in: maxima (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Also affects: maxima (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New", but that's not a notice that it's been published, right? | 17:03 |
| tumbleweed | jabowery: you will | 17:04 |
| nacc | infinity: mdeslaur: after some wrangling, debian maintainer has bumped the abi for imagemagick :) | 17:10 |
| smoser | hey, i'm using apt.Cache() from python apt package. | 17:26 |
| smoser | im' using it on zesty, and want to be able to apt.Cache(rootdir=foo) | 17:27 |
| smoser | cache.update() is failing | 17:27 |
| smoser | due to i think no keyrings | 17:27 |
| smoser | to read xenial data | 17:27 |
| smoser | http://paste.ubuntu.com/23669428/ | 17:28 |
| smoser | what is the right way to tell it that i want it to use the old keyrings ? | 17:28 |
| nacc | smoser: add_key_from_keyserver? (just paging through the files/APIs) | 17:33 |
| smoser | whered you see that ? | 17:34 |
| nacc | smoser: it's in apt/auth.py | 17:34 |
| smoser | i dont think iw ant to add from a keyserver, but i do wan tot add a key | 17:34 |
| nacc | you can also add from a file, i think | 17:34 |
| nacc | add_key_from_file | 17:34 |
| nacc | or even just add_key :) | 17:35 |
| smoser | nacc, hm... no dice. | 17:46 |
| smoser | all that does is run apt-key | 17:46 |
| nacc | smoser: rbasak: i think this might have been a thinko on my part in the remote addition for `usd clone`: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23669494/; right now, the remote branches in `git branch` do not show up as remote, because they are all fetched into refs/heads (which is the local branches). Thoughts? | 17:47 |
| nacc | smoser: oh, hrm | 17:47 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: ok, with all the builder bits enabled, looks like the images are still failing - I suppose it might be something missing in livecd-rootfs? | 18:32 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: from what I see you didn't submit any changes for ubuntu-budgie there? I suppose that should be needed? You mentioned the builds succeeded locally on your build environment though | 18:33 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: to be honest - I didnt know there was yet another project to make changes to :( | 18:39 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: this project? https://launchpad.net/livecd-rootfs | 18:41 |
| fossfreedom | looking at the code ... not sure where to make changes. | 18:42 |
| === dax is now known as daxen | ||
| fossfreedom | maybe this? - looks to have some flavor specifics http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/trunk/view/head:/live-build/auto/config | 18:44 |
| === scottt is now known as Guest98952 | ||
| === daxen is now known as dax | ||
| fossfreedom | sil2100: ok - have created a branch with changes that are very similar to ubuntu-gnome's - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1652144 | 19:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1652144 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "start building Ubuntu Budgie images" [Undecided,New] | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: ok, let me try taking a look at them but it's a bit lateish here | 19:24 |
| === JanC_ is now known as Guest35600 | ||
| === JanC__ is now known as JanC | ||
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: ok, quick thing - could you switch the changelog entry from 'zesty' to UNRELEASED? | 19:36 |
| sil2100 | We only put series names once the package is released | 19:36 |
| fossfreedom | yep - doing it now | 19:37 |
| sil2100 | Thanks | 19:41 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I'll try to release this, but then I'm going off ;) | 19:41 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: push the change to the branch, I'll merge it, prepare for release and run a test build | 19:42 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: ok - thanks - pushed | 19:43 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: ok, new livecd-rootfs building | 19:49 |
| fossfreedom | sil2100: much appreciated! Have a good night! ... and if you are off for xmas - have a great hols. | 19:50 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: thanks for the quick response btw, we might get this building before my EOY ;) | 19:50 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: same to you! | 20:50 |
| sil2100 | fossfreedom: I go off now, the package still didn't migrate from -proposed so I can't run the job | 20:50 |
| sil2100 | But when I see it migrated later today I'll just kick a quick build - if not, tomorrow's daily build should catch any possible issues | 20:50 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 20:50 |
| jgrimm | nacc, http://paste.ubuntu.com/23670285/ | 21:35 |
| jgrimm | nacc, ah.. %% will get me what I want. | 21:51 |
| nacc | jgrimm: ah yes, but even that is incorrect | 22:14 |
| nacc | err, no, you're right | 22:14 |
| nacc | it should be fine, sorry! | 22:14 |
| nacc | jgrimm: can you file a bug on that (or put a comment in the one already filed for logical tag issues) | 22:14 |
| jgrimm | yeah, %% should escape the % that you've used to represent : for | 22:14 |
| jgrimm | nacc, yeah, you could probably push out a warning for that at least | 22:15 |
| jgrimm | will do | 22:15 |
| nacc | jgrimm: yep, we can do a quick sub in the string to escape certain characters (I think % is the only one we'd need to, actually) | 22:16 |
| jgrimm | yeah, i had guessed that from the bug you had against logical tag | 22:16 |
| nacc | infinity: in case you care, and i hope you don't, i think php-horde-crypt's failures are all related to the gpg2 migration: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23670714/. Going to try sending htat upstream as well | 23:19 |
| === jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-holiday | ||
| nacc | infinity: and nm, i found a even smaller patch for upstream, which doesn't rquire the killall ugliness | 23:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!