[09:43] <mup> Bug #1653330 changed: package maas-rack-controller 2.1.3+bzr5573-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 <amd64> <apport-package> <need-duplicate-check> <zesty> <maas (Ubuntu):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653330>
[12:12] <miono> After commissioning when doing "deploy" maas assigns an IP that's not in the DHCP-range.
[12:12] <miono> That seems very strange to me.
[12:13] <miono> It adds a fixed host-record in dhcpd.leases
[12:13] <pmatulis> miono, what IP assignment mode did you assign to that node? auto-assign, dhcp, ...
[12:14] <miono> pmatulis: Yeah, auto-assign
[12:15] <miono> and my dhcp-pool is "range 10.0.99.191 10.0.99.254;"
[12:15] <miono> But my dhcpd.conf suddenly gets this config:
[12:15] <miono> host 52-54-00-e8-ec-43 {
[12:15] <miono> hardware ethernet 52:54:00:e8:ec:43;
[12:15] <miono> fixed-address 10.0.99.2;
[12:15] <miono> }
[12:16] <pmatulis> miono, what do you have as a 'reserved dynamic range'?
[12:16] <miono> pmatulis: hm, where do I find that?
[12:16] <pmatulis> in the subnet page
[12:16] <pmatulis> click on your subnet
[12:17] <miono> yeah, found it.
[12:17] <miono> there I have that same range that's configured (by maas) in dhcpd.conf
[12:17] <miono> 10.0.99.191
[12:17] <miono> 10.0.99.254
[12:17] <miono> that range
[12:19] <pmatulis> miono, i don't recall the cli commands to collect this info so, in the web ui, if you can get a screenshot of the subnet page and the page describing the node in question, that would help
[12:19] <miono> pmatulis: alright.
[12:21] <miono> pmatulis: http://lagga.se/subnet_page.png and http://lagga.se/interface_page_for_host.png
[12:27] <pmatulis> miono, see https://docs.ubuntu.com/maas/2.1/en/installconfig-commission-nodes#post-commission-configuration
[12:29] <miono> pmatulis: Aaah, I see.
[12:29] <miono> Thanks for your help.
[12:30] <pmatulis> welcome
[13:09] <miono> I want to install Ubuntu Server with maas, but can't select it from maas.io-images. So I guess I must add my own custom source.
[13:09] <miono> But I don't know what type of link to use there. If I link to a normal repository that has .iso's it says " Mirror provides no Ubuntu images. "
[13:15] <pmatulis> miono, the default boot image source gives you *only* ubuntu server
[13:16] <pmatulis> so you don't need to do anything special
[13:17] <miono> pmatulis: ah, coolio
[22:14] <mup> Bug #1653797 opened: [2.1.2] Unable to deploy ureaahead errors <cdo-qa> <MAAS:Incomplete by cgregan> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653797>
[22:23] <mup> Bug #1653797 changed: [2.1.2] Unable to deploy ureaahead errors <cdo-qa> <MAAS:Incomplete by cgregan> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653797>
[22:24] <smgoller> hey all, from a scalability standpoint, at what point would you consider adding a rack controller? only if you have multiple physical locations?
[22:26] <mup> Bug #1653797 opened: [2.1.2] Unable to deploy ureaahead errors <cdo-qa> <MAAS:Incomplete by cgregan> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653797>
[22:30] <zeestrat> smgoller: Not from the MAAS team, but we're using rack controllers to manage separate racks and have set some up with multiple rack controllers for HA.
[22:32] <zeestrat> smgoller: Check out some of the slides from the presentations in https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/09/08/maas-2-0-released/ for some better graphics on HA layouts.
[22:33] <pmatulis> smgoller, HA aside, a rackd shouldn't manage more than ~1000 nodes
[22:33] <smgoller> hah, ok, we're nowhere near that so cool
[22:44] <mup> Bug #1653805 opened: iLO2 fails to change boot order during IPMI power management <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653805>
[22:47] <mup> Bug #1653805 changed: iLO2 fails to change boot order during IPMI power management <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653805>
[22:57] <mup> Bug #1653805 opened: iLO2 fails to change boot order during IPMI power management <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653805>