=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== tacocat` is now known as tacocat
[16:26] <hotellina> Hi everybody, I reported a bug for Ubuntu and I got asked more information. After having provided more info do I have to manage the status myself setting the status from Incomplete >> to Confirmed?
[16:30] <cjwatson> it won't happen automatically, if that's what you mean; either you change that or wait for whoever asked you for the information to (maybe) do it
[16:33] <hotellina> tnx cjwatson, I am going to change the status now myself.
[16:34] <sigmavirus> hotellina: you might not want to change to Confirmed though. That status doesn't mean what you think it means
[16:35] <hotellina> Ok, I'll leaving rotting in Incomplete then....
[16:37] <hotellina> tnx
[16:37] <cjwatson> Confirmed isn't likely to be worse than Incomplete
=== JanC is now known as Guest75542
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[16:42] <rbasak> I suggested new in #ubuntu-bugs. If someone thinks the question asked that caused it to be set to Incomplete is answered, New is always an improvement I think.
[16:47] <hotellina> rbasak is your suggestion for someone acting as submitter or for the reviewer of the bug itself?
[16:52] <sigmavirus> hotellina: so you're the reporter, I'd move it to New
[16:52] <sigmavirus> If you were reviewing the bug, moving it to Confirmed would be fine
[16:52] <sigmavirus> But based on what you said at first, you're the reporter, not the reviewer
[16:53] <hotellina> Ok, thanks, it make sense now. It was my first bug reported.
[16:53] <sigmavirus> No worries =)
=== salem_ is now known as _salem