[08:15] <Mirv> qtmir and qtubuntu both fail to build, bug #1653902 and bug #1653905
[08:15] <ubot5`> bug 1653902 in qtmir (Ubuntu) "qtmir new FTBFS on Qt 5.7.1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653902
[08:15] <ubot5`> bug 1653905 in qtubuntu (Ubuntu) "qtubuntu FTBFS on zesty (on Qt 5.7.1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653905
[08:29] <tsdgeos> Mirv: nothing to do with Qt 5.7
[08:29] <tsdgeos> or maybe yes
[08:29] <tsdgeos> not the second
[08:30] <tsdgeos> https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/qtubuntu/fix-ftbfs-mir0.25/+merge/313525
[08:30] <tsdgeos> for qtubuntu
[08:33] <Mirv> tsdgeos: yeah that's what I thought, qtubuntu general problem qtmir possibly Qt 5.7
[08:38] <Mirv> yes, qtmir builds on xenial still, so probably 5.7 related
[09:00] <tsdgeos> yep
[09:00] <tsdgeos> qtmir and qt fight over the c++ to use
[09:00] <tsdgeos> -std=c++14 -fPIC -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -Wextra -fPIC   -fPIC -std=gnu++11
[09:00] <tsdgeos> so one says 14
[09:00] <tsdgeos> the other says 11
[09:00] <tsdgeos> 11 wins wrongly
[09:00] <tsdgeos> let me try to patch it
[09:16] <tsdgeos> Mirv: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/qtmir/better_c++14_cmake/+merge/314052
[09:16] <tsdgeos> greyback: ↑↑↑
[09:17] <tsdgeos> Saviq: maybe we can sneak ↑↑↑↑ in the silo if it is not in very advanced state?
[09:17] <Mirv> tsdgeos: nice!!
[09:17] <Saviq> tsdgeos, since it failed to build, probably :P
[09:18] <greyback> tsdgeos: looks good to me
[09:19] <Saviq> tsdgeos, since you've been reviewing this, any idea about "cp: cannot create regular file '[...]tests/mocks/Unity/qmldir': File exists"?
[09:19] <Saviq> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/301132910/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-i386.unity8_8.15+16.04.20170104-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[09:19] <Saviq> I've seen it happen on arm64 once and i386 twice
[09:20] <tsdgeos> no
[09:20] <tsdgeos> don't remember to have seen it before
[09:20] <greyback> it looks like it calls that command twice
[09:21] <greyback> a multi-cpu cmake bug?
[09:22] <Saviq> ¿?
[09:29] <greyback> maybe not, cmake not run with -j
[13:37] <Mirv> kgunn: Saviq: is U8 team mostly interested in Qt 5.6 also for 17.04, as the snap comes from there, and mostly smoke testing the archive version? I'm wondering since I'm preparing Qt 5.7.1 for zesty.
[13:38] <Mirv> kgunn: Saviq: FYI there's also Qt 5.6.2 brewing at https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2072/+packages , feel free to start testing as early as you can and also consider how it affects snap efforts as it'd suddnely change the overlay to a new minor version - should be compatible though but just in case.
[13:46] <Saviq> Mirv, hey, only thing I know that we're looking forwards to new Qt for is UI scaling, but that got a rehaul in 5.9 again so 5.7 isn't really interesting in that sense either
[13:47] <Saviq> @unity: is there anything else we're "waiting" for WRT Qt versions in Ubuntu/overlay ↑↑?
[13:47] <Mirv> Saviq: yeah, I mostly mean that Qt 5.6 based U8 is the "product" so to speak, even though also normal archive version is in archives
[13:48] <Mirv> so me landing Qt 5.7.1 is less risky than me landing 5.6.2 and you'd also be interested in testing 5.6.2 more thoroughly
[13:48] <Saviq> Mirv, the snap is actually built from 16.04
[13:49] <Saviq> https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+snap/unity8-session-silo
[13:49] <Saviq> so that one is "product" the most
[13:55] <Mirv> Saviq: yes, that's what I meant, xenial+overlay, and the 5.6.2 PPA targets replacing overlay's 5.6.1 with 5.6.2
[13:55] <Mirv> so 5.6.2 landing is kind of more important than zesty's 5.7.1, as long as 5.7.1 smoketests fine, would be my interpretation.
[13:55] <Mirv> anyway 5.7.1 should be the first to land too
[13:56] <Saviq> Mirv, correct
[18:57] <dmj_s76> andyrock: Hey, would it be possible to get the merge for hidpi scaling merged soon?
[18:57] <andyrock> dmj_s76: hey
[18:57] <andyrock> it's up to Trevinho
[18:57] <andyrock> we had the xmas break
[18:57] <dmj_s76> This would be really nice to have in time for 16.04.2
[18:57] <andyrock> he has to prepare the silo
[18:58] <dmj_s76> andyrock: Yeah, I was out last week too.  Hope you all had good holidays.
[19:09] <andyrock> I'll talk with Trevinho about it
[19:28] <dmj_s76> thanks
[20:01] <attente> does anyone know why the webbrowser app crashes under u8? i've seen this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1573762 but it's pretty old
[20:01] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1573762 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) " Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - webbrowser-app does not launch" [High,Confirmed]