mupBug #1654432 opened: Unable to deploy ga kernel on node-details page <MAAS:Triaged by ltrager> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1654432>00:15
mupBug #1654450 opened: MAAS shouldn't show newer kernels when edge kernels are added <MAAS:Triaged by ltrager> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1654450>00:45
=== mup_ is now known as mup
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban
=== ahasenack is now known as Guest99073
=== Kiall is now known as Guest87200
mupBug #1654515 opened: Feature Request: Custom post-deploy (cloud-init or preseed) scripts per node linked to tags <feature> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1654515>09:21
=== jamespag` is now known as jamespage
=== mup_ is now known as mup
=== Guest99073 is now known as ahasenack
=== ahasenack is now known as Guest76687
=== Guest76687 is now known as ahasenack
sponikAnyone here that can answer few questions ?15:04
pmatulissponik, dunno, just ask15:05
sponikWhen configuring MaaS subnet for PXE under fabric that has its own interface with specific IP that specific IP have to be set as gateway for PXE to boot and access repose for ubuntu correctly ? Can Subnet gateway be set to gateway on firewall and still work correctly ?15:10
pmatulissponik, the gateway is simply the gateway that will be assigned to the nodes when they boot15:15
pmatulissponik, just try and see15:15
sponikI did try config with gateway beeing on MAAS rack controller and all work fine for provisioning. When I try to set gateway of the firewall do be default gateway for subnet with internet access it breaks as it cant access ubuntu cloud init data.15:19
pmatulissponik, ok i get it15:20
sponikIn production environment you have to have gateway set to MaaS server is not a best solution for internet traffic controll access ? is there same good aproach to this ? Each server have 8 nics and first is set to be PXE and IPMI and then rest are for other actual networks.15:20
sponikApplication interface should carry default gateway rather then PXE server that is in my case 2nd NIC15:22
pmatulissponik, the node traffic will need to be routed through the maas machine or configure a possible 2nd network card on the node15:23
sponikI can apply ansible script that carry 2nd network card configuration but also change gateway and that will break then MaaS access and PXE handling. I can configure 2nd interface and leave gateway to be MaaS IP on that subnet but then I have to add all static routes if I want my traffic get back to source networks that initial communication toward 2nd Network card interface. That is a lot of network management. Is there better way to sol15:27
mupBug #1653797 changed: [2.1.2] Unable to deploy ureaahead errors <cdo-qa> <MAAS:Incomplete by cgregan> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653797>16:10
mupBug #1645644 opened: ntp not using expected servers <cloud-init:New> <cloud-init (Ubuntu):Incomplete> <maas (Ubuntu):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645644>16:11
=== holocron is now known as vmorris
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk
mupBug #1645644 changed: ntp not using expected servers <cloud-init:New> <cloud-init (Ubuntu):Confirmed> <maas (Ubuntu):Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1645644>21:38
=== spaok_ is now known as spaok

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!