/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/01/09/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== med_ is now known as Guest34220
=== psivaa_ is now known as psivaa
apwjbicha, i think that is actually nbs in -proposed, will see if that sorts it out07:31
apwjbicha, looks to have done the trick08:48
apwinfinity, bug #1652147 seems to indicate that if someone was on trusty and got the broke 1.21.4* shim and upgraded to xenial they would _then_ have an unbootable combination; dunno if we need a .is. upload there?09:52
ubot5bug 1652147 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "UEFI secure boot fails after 14.04 to 16.04 upgrade" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165214709:52
smbbtw, I updated the report now with explanation and work-around09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: olefile [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.43-1~ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted olefile [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.43-1~ubuntu1]11:45
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
roaksoaxa/win 912:56
LocutusOfBorghi, can you please ignore why autopkgtestsuite?13:04
LocutusOfBorgLaney, ^^13:04
LocutusOfBorgthat test was excluded in an Ubuntu specific diff, but now doko sync'd it13:04
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: I guess so13:09
LocutusOfBorgLaney, do you prefer an ubuntu patch? I think ignoring it is the best solution13:25
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: I don't really mind, probably not that important to have a delta over13:27
Laneywould be good if people would follow through on their test-breaking syncs though :-)13:28
Laneythank you for pinging!13:28
LocutusOfBorgI guess so, a crippled autpkgtestsuite is not worth a delta13:28
LocutusOfBorgthanks for ignoring :)13:28
LocutusOfBorghopefully ocaml will migrate13:28
clivejoLaney: is there any way to get KDE KF 5.28 force-allowed ?13:31
LocutusOfBorgclivejo, can't you retry some of the failed test against -proposed?13:38
LocutusOfBorge.g. akonadi/amd6413:39
clivejoLocutusOfBorg: not sure what you mean?13:40
LocutusOfBorgclivejo, stuff is failing its autopkgtestsuite, because it is run against -release, not against -proposed13:41
LocutusOfBorglook e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/zesty/update_excuses.html#kservice13:41
LocutusOfBorgautopkgtest for kscreenlocker/5.7.5-0ubuntu1: armhf: Pass, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass13:41
LocutusOfBorgautopkgtest for kscreenlocker/5.8.5-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass13:41
LocutusOfBorgretrying kscreenlocker i386 and ppc64el tests, against -proposed suite might make the testsuite pass13:41
LocutusOfBorg(append &all-proposed=1 at the end of the retry link)13:42
clivejoat this point we are expecting the landing of Qt5.7.1 as per Mirv comments above13:43
LocutusOfBorgI'm retrying some of them, just to see if proposed pocket is self consistent13:44
LocutusOfBorgI retried probably all of them, lets see13:47
clivejoLocutusOfBorg: in the past, we have requested a force-allow, do you know who can do that?13:47
LocutusOfBorgclivejo, you already pinged who can do that I guess :)13:55
LocutusOfBorgbut some more green in the zesty updates excuses page is nice to have13:55
LocutusOfBorgit requires little effort to rerun against -proposed pocket, and avoids bad surprises13:56
Laneyclivejo: Does the Kubuntu team work on the test failures that you get from autopkgtest?13:57
LaneyOr just request to skip all failures?13:57
clivejowe are trying to, however we are seriously underpowered and lacking the people with the necessary knowledge/skills13:58
clivejoAt this point, with Qt5.7.1 landing soon, we think its best to skip them13:59
LaneyFair enough --- I'm just wondering how much value they bring you/us13:59
clivejo5.28 will be superseded by release time14:00
clivejowell we understand they are important and do intend to fix them before release, but at the moment they are causing a log jam in the entire KDE stack14:01
LaneyFor example every Qt upload triggers several hundred KDE tests, all of which rebuild the package (taking a long time), so if they aren't actually used by anyone ...14:02
LocutusOfBorglol true story :)14:03
Laneyclivejo: Anyway. Can you provide me with a list of packages that you want to skip? One per line: "force-badtest package/version"14:03
LaneyMight want to wait a little bit for LocutusOfBorg's reruns to come in14:03
clivejoif anyone can see the problems in why the tests are failing please let us know14:04
clivejowe do need to learn :)14:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)14:05
LaneyProbably requires specific knowledge of the packages being tested14:05
clivejoyes, that is a problem, the KDE stack is huge14:05
acheronukLaney: taking as an example http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#knotifications14:22
acheronukwould that be 'force-badtest package/version knotifications' ?14:22
acheronukforce-badtest knotifications/5.28.0-0ubuntu1 I mean14:23
Laneyacheronuk: force-badtest is for the actual packages being tested - gwenview, kleopatra, konsole, kparts in this case14:25
LaneyStill, like I say, probably wait a bit for the re-runs14:25
acheronukLaney: aha! thank you14:26
Laneyacheronuk: You can use force-skiptest on the triggering package (knotifications) to skip all the tests under that one14:28
LaneyWhich one you want to use depends on why you're trying to skip a test14:28
acheronukLaney: so which in these cases, where we are looking to get these through?14:31
mapreriCan I ask for the diffoscope regression in armhf (against itself) to be ignored??14:32
apwmapreri, is there a reason behind that ?14:42
mapreriapw: That we (diffoscope dev, which includes me, damn) lacks enough tuits to fix it properly, but the error is really harmless; diffoscope works just fine on armhf, only the testsuite is very brittle and and picky on other tools output.14:47
maprerialso, the old version is deemed to block other packages soon, new version fixed compatibility with newer version of tools (for the comparison I said ↑)14:50
apwmapreri, done (hopefully)14:58
mapreriapw: Thank you!16:24
mapreri(+ it worked, guess you can now drop the hint too)16:24
ginggsmapreri: the hint is only for that version, see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/216616:28
mapreriginggs: ack (+ thanks for linking that, I didn't know where they are16:29
mapreri)16:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.1 => 1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2] (no packageset)16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2]16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2]16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyparallel [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-2] (no packageset)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-invariant [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.2.2-1] (no packageset)17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsub-quote-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.003001-1] (no packageset)17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-invariant [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.2-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyparallel [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.2-2]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsub-quote-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.003001-1]17:28
apwbdmurray, the docker.io SRU exception is not very clear to me, specifically i am assuming from the uploads that it is intended to imply an upstream minor release exception; is that correct ?17:31
bdmurrayapw: "The aim is to backport the .1 release of a major version to the current LTS" - so yes17:33
apwbdmurray, right, i can take that to imply that we can take .2 et al, good17:33
acheronukcan someone force-badtest baloo-widgets5/4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 ?20:31
acheronukas soon as we are able after new QT lands, this will be replaced by KDE applications 16.12 upload anyway20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.12+16.10ubuntu1 => 0.13+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.12+16.04ubuntu1 => 0.13+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:43
apwacheronuk, done21:00
LocutusOfBorgLaney, why didn't you ignore why autopkgtestsuite? (affecting why, frama-c migration) /me pun intended21:54
clivejoLocutusOfBorg: may I PM you?21:57
LocutusOfBorgclivejo, sure21:59
LocutusOfBorgI'm going to bed BTW21:59
clivejooh right, I won't bother you then!22:00
LocutusOfBorgno, feel free to PM22:00
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/216422:03
ginggsI don't know why that didn't work22:03
LocutusOfBorginteresting22:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:12
ginggsi think all/all is not valid syntax, i only see one other occurence of it: force-badtest pbsuite/all/all (p.itti) - and that doesn't work because i recently had to request pbsuite/15.8.24+dfsg-2/i386 (s.tefanor)22:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:17
clivejocan someone force-badtest kio/5.28.0-0ubuntu1 please?22:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-stopit [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgrouting [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3.2+ds-1] (no packageset)23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.3.2+ds-1]23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-stopit [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.1-1]23:26

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!