[07:31] <apw> jbicha, i think that is actually nbs in -proposed, will see if that sorts it out
[08:48] <apw> jbicha, looks to have done the trick
[09:52] <apw> infinity, bug #1652147 seems to indicate that if someone was on trusty and got the broke 1.21.4* shim and upgraded to xenial they would _then_ have an unbootable combination; dunno if we need a .is. upload there?
[09:54] <smb> btw, I updated the report now with explanation and work-around
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gyoto [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted yaz [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [5.19.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: olefile [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.43-1~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted olefile [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.43-1~ubuntu1]
[12:56] <roaksoax> a/win 9
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> hi, can you please ignore why autopkgtestsuite?
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> that test was excluded in an Ubuntu specific diff, but now doko sync'd it
[13:09] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: I guess so
[13:25] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, do you prefer an ubuntu patch? I think ignoring it is the best solution
[13:27] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: I don't really mind, probably not that important to have a delta over
[13:28] <Laney> would be good if people would follow through on their test-breaking syncs though :-)
[13:28] <Laney> thank you for pinging!
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I guess so, a crippled autpkgtestsuite is not worth a delta
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for ignoring :)
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> hopefully ocaml will migrate
[13:31] <clivejo> Laney: is there any way to get KDE KF 5.28 force-allowed ?
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> clivejo, can't you retry some of the failed test against -proposed?
[13:39] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. akonadi/amd64
[13:40] <clivejo> LocutusOfBorg: not sure what you mean?
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> clivejo, stuff is failing its autopkgtestsuite, because it is run against -release, not against -proposed
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> look e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/zesty/update_excuses.html#kservice
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for kscreenlocker/5.7.5-0ubuntu1: armhf: Pass, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for kscreenlocker/5.8.5-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass
[13:41] <LocutusOfBorg> retrying kscreenlocker i386 and ppc64el tests, against -proposed suite might make the testsuite pass
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> (append &all-proposed=1 at the end of the retry link)
[13:43] <clivejo> at this point we are expecting the landing of Qt5.7.1 as per Mirv comments above
[13:44] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm retrying some of them, just to see if proposed pocket is self consistent
[13:47] <LocutusOfBorg> I retried probably all of them, lets see
[13:47] <clivejo> LocutusOfBorg: in the past, we have requested a force-allow, do you know who can do that?
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> clivejo, you already pinged who can do that I guess :)
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> but some more green in the zesty updates excuses page is nice to have
[13:56] <LocutusOfBorg> it requires little effort to rerun against -proposed pocket, and avoids bad surprises
[13:57] <Laney> clivejo: Does the Kubuntu team work on the test failures that you get from autopkgtest?
[13:57] <Laney> Or just request to skip all failures?
[13:58] <clivejo> we are trying to, however we are seriously underpowered and lacking the people with the necessary knowledge/skills
[13:59] <clivejo> At this point, with Qt5.7.1 landing soon, we think its best to skip them
[13:59] <Laney> Fair enough --- I'm just wondering how much value they bring you/us
[14:00] <clivejo> 5.28 will be superseded by release time
[14:01] <clivejo> well we understand they are important and do intend to fix them before release, but at the moment they are causing a log jam in the entire KDE stack
[14:02] <Laney> For example every Qt upload triggers several hundred KDE tests, all of which rebuild the package (taking a long time), so if they aren't actually used by anyone ...
[14:03] <LocutusOfBorg> lol true story :)
[14:03] <Laney> clivejo: Anyway. Can you provide me with a list of packages that you want to skip? One per line: "force-badtest package/version"
[14:03] <Laney> Might want to wait a little bit for LocutusOfBorg's reruns to come in
[14:04] <clivejo> if anyone can see the problems in why the tests are failing please let us know
[14:04] <clivejo> we do need to learn :)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:2.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)
[14:05] <Laney> Probably requires specific knowledge of the packages being tested
[14:05] <clivejo> yes, that is a problem, the KDE stack is huge
[14:22] <acheronuk> Laney: taking as an example http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#knotifications
[14:22] <acheronuk> would that be 'force-badtest package/version knotifications' ?
[14:23] <acheronuk> force-badtest knotifications/5.28.0-0ubuntu1 I mean
[14:25] <Laney> acheronuk: force-badtest is for the actual packages being tested - gwenview, kleopatra, konsole, kparts in this case
[14:25] <Laney> Still, like I say, probably wait a bit for the re-runs
[14:26] <acheronuk> Laney: aha! thank you
[14:28] <Laney> acheronuk: You can use force-skiptest on the triggering package (knotifications) to skip all the tests under that one
[14:28] <Laney> Which one you want to use depends on why you're trying to skip a test
[14:31] <acheronuk> Laney: so which in these cases, where we are looking to get these through?
[14:32] <mapreri> Can I ask for the diffoscope regression in armhf (against itself) to be ignored??
[14:42] <apw> mapreri, is there a reason behind that ?
[14:47] <mapreri> apw: That we (diffoscope dev, which includes me, damn) lacks enough tuits to fix it properly, but the error is really harmless; diffoscope works just fine on armhf, only the testsuite is very brittle and and picky on other tools output.
[14:50] <mapreri> also, the old version is deemed to block other packages soon, new version fixed compatibility with newer version of tools (for the comparison I said ↑)
[14:58] <apw> mapreri, done (hopefully)
[16:24] <mapreri> apw: Thank you!
[16:24] <mapreri> (+ it worked, guess you can now drop the hint too)
[16:28] <ginggs> mapreri: the hint is only for that version, see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2166
[16:29] <mapreri> ginggs: ack (+ thanks for linking that, I didn't know where they are
[16:29] <mapreri> )
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.1 => 1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2] (no packageset)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2]
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyparallel [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libatteanx-endpoint-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.001-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-invariant [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsub-quote-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.003001-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-invariant [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyparallel [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.2-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libatteanx-endpoint-perl [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.001-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsub-quote-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.003001-1]
[17:31] <apw> bdmurray, the docker.io SRU exception is not very clear to me, specifically i am assuming from the uploads that it is intended to imply an upstream minor release exception; is that correct ?
[17:33] <bdmurray> apw: "The aim is to backport the .1 release of a major version to the current LTS" - so yes
[17:33] <apw> bdmurray, right, i can take that to imply that we can take .2 et al, good
[20:31] <acheronuk> can someone force-badtest baloo-widgets5/4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 ?
[20:32] <acheronuk> as soon as we are able after new QT lands, this will be replaced by KDE applications 16.12 upload anyway
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.12+16.10ubuntu1 => 0.13+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.12+16.04ubuntu1 => 0.13+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:00] <apw> acheronuk, done
[21:54] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, why didn't you ignore why autopkgtestsuite? (affecting why, frama-c migration) /me pun intended
[21:57] <clivejo> LocutusOfBorg: may I PM you?
[21:59] <LocutusOfBorg> clivejo, sure
[21:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm going to bed BTW
[22:00] <clivejo> oh right, I won't bother you then!
[22:00] <LocutusOfBorg> no, feel free to PM
[22:03] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2164
[22:03] <ginggs> I don't know why that didn't work
[22:05] <LocutusOfBorg> interesting
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:12] <ginggs> i think all/all is not valid syntax, i only see one other occurence of it: force-badtest pbsuite/all/all (p.itti) - and that doesn't work because i recently had to request pbsuite/15.8.24+dfsg-2/i386 (s.tefanor)
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:19] <clivejo> can someone force-badtest kio/5.28.0-0ubuntu1 please?
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.8~beta2-1ubuntu1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-stopit [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgrouting [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgrouting [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.3.2+ds-1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-stopit [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.1-1]