[07:23] <bazhang> forkbomb and the rm etc command from deadbit
[07:33] <deadbit> hell!
[07:33] <deadbit> o
[07:33] <deadbit> hello!
[07:33] <deadbit> So I was offering a new guy some help in avoiding random people telling him to run random commands.
[07:34] <deadbit> I don't think it's correct - even if it is bazhang and he's an op to tell a member of a community for the official ubuntu support channel to run a random command.
[07:34] <deadbit> Also - as a user of Ubuntu - I don't see why you have banned me from the official support channel.
[07:35] <bazhang> you were the one to post the forkbomb deadbit
[07:35] <bazhang> and the rm etc command deadbit
[07:35] <deadbit> is this something i can talk to canonical about? seeing as i do have support through them?
[07:35] <bazhang> no
[07:35] <deadbit> yes I said DO NOT RUN commands.
[07:36] <deadbit> Do you say no as an official representative of them?
[07:36] <bazhang> never post them
[07:36] <bazhang> canonical has no say over irc #ubuntu deadbit
[07:36] <deadbit> Again are you telling me, that No i cannot ask canonical/ubuntu about the issue i am having from the official support channel?
[07:37] <deadbit> from what i understand - channel with # are official channel linked to the projects themselves
[07:37] <bazhang> deadbit, let's be very clear, you posted it, you created the issue
[07:37] <deadbit> and the channel even states that this is the official support channel for ubuntu
[07:37] <deadbit> lets be very clear..... are you denying me access to the official support i'm entitle too?
[07:38] <bazhang> deadbit, thats a privilege not a right
[07:38] <deadbit> no it's a right but the terms of agreement in the ubuntu TOS
[07:39] <bazhang> deadbit, this is not the place to argue about such things; you posted some very bad things in the #ubuntu channel and were banned as a result
[07:39] <deadbit> This is exactly the place to talk about it.
[07:39] <bazhang> deadbit, did you wish to resolve that issue or not
[07:39] <deadbit> Are you acting as a representative of Ubuntu in this matter?
[07:40] <deadbit> Sure I do. I stated I was helping a fellow community member to avoid detrimental commands that could disrupt his OS.
[07:40] <bazhang> deadbit, this entire channel is the ops channel for the various ubuntu channels
[07:41] <deadbit> I gave examples to avoid. I did not state to run them, in fact I stated to not run them.
[07:41] <deadbit> But I can see you're trying to obfuscate the issue.
[07:43] <deadbit> I will consider you an official representative of Ubuntu; You are also violating my rights as a member and user of Ubuntu products since you have effectively rendered a support channel null to me.
[07:45] <deadbit> I have asked you clearly if you are acting as a representative of Ubuntu and you do not state yes or no. Yes you have to power to deny my access to an official support channel. I take this to be a violation of my rights to service under the TOS of Ubuntu as the channel has clearly made the distinction of it being a proper and recognized support channel for Ubuntu.
[07:46] <bazhang> deadbit, did you wish to discuss resolution of the ban, or continue as you are presently
[07:47] <deadbit> bazhang: Again, are you acting as a representative for Ubuntu? Will you deny me service for Ubuntu Official Channels? I have clearly stated that my comments were meant and intended under good faith to assist a fellow community member under an officially recognized support channel.
[07:48] <bazhang> forkbombs are not an assist, ever deadbit
[07:49] <deadbit> The information presented was for assistance - it was clear to the user; from the remark I made to avoid random commands given to members of the community from random individuals.
[07:50] <deadbit> It was so he could recognize a malicious command; and avoid it. This will prevent him from running a command in the future that could and would be harmful to his system.
[07:51] <bazhang> deadbit, if you did not wish to discuss the resolution of your ban, there is no reason to continue this discussion
[07:51] <deadbit> I'm sure you have the log - so I will ask a final time. Are you acting as an official representative of Ubuntu - and do you have the authority to deny me access to services which are rights to a user under the Ubuntu TOS on an officially recognized support channel?
[07:52] <deadbit> I have discussed it with you.
[07:52] <bazhang> deadbit, irc channels have operators, that moderate
[07:52] <deadbit> I will make sure to find the appropriate party and inform them of your actions in violation of the TOS.
[07:52] <bazhang> !appeals | deadbit
[07:53] <bazhang> feel free to appeal your ban deadbit
[07:54] <deadbit> I will seek assistance for this official support channel from Ubuntu and contact my VAR representative... thank you.
[07:55] <deadbit> I am currently documenting our discussion - If you remove me from the channel I will consider this an additional violation of the TOS.
[07:55] <deadbit> It is my intention to leave once I have documented my grievance and contacted the appropriate parties.
[07:55] <bazhang> deadbit, there are channel logs
[07:55] <bazhang> !1984 | deadbit
[07:56] <deadbit> Thank you for your time. Have a wonderful night!
[09:34] <bazhang> is kegsay threatening something on #ubuntu ?
[09:34] <ikonia> no, I don't think so
[09:35] <ikonia> I'm wondering if this is the matrix clean up
[09:35] <ikonia> or if another service is having a similar problem
[09:35] <ikonia> there goes a matrix user
[09:35] <ikonia> it must be matrix
[09:36] <ikonia> won't that be the same problem as the gateway timing out idle users
[09:36] <ikonia> is this the matrix solution it kicks idle users ?
[09:36] <ikonia> mass leave ?
[09:36] <ikonia> or is this just a one off thing ?
[15:41] <elky> ikonia: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/issues/304#issuecomment-271939428 suggests periodic. it's the first time ever this time, they're still figuring out what exactly they'll be doing.
[17:34] <dax> ^ says Dinner is a PM bot, looks like an android IRC clint to me, and am unable to reproduce the issue
[17:34] <dax> client*