[06:02] <hikiko> hi
[08:33] <flexiondotorg> Morning hikiko
[08:34] <hikiko> hi flexiondotorg
[09:00] <willcooke> morning all
[09:03] <Laney> morning
[09:04] <Laney> jbicha: Kind of annoying when someone monkeys with your work.
[09:04] <Laney> I mean you could have just waited a few hours to talk to me
[09:08] <davmor2> Morning all
[09:08] <Laney> hey davmor2
[09:08] <Laney> happy friday to you
[09:09] <davmor2> Laney: happy snowy friday to you too
[09:10] <seb128> hey flexiondotorg willcooke Laney hikiko davmor2
[09:10] <flexiondotorg> Morning willcooke Laney davmor2 seb128
[09:10] <hikiko> hi seb128 willcooke Laney davmor2
[09:10]  * Laney nods seb128 flexiondotorg hikiko willcooke 
[09:10] <Laney> what's up?
[09:11] <seb128> it's friday!
[09:11] <davmor2> Laney: snow slowly falling down
[09:11] <seb128> it was snowing this morning, didn't stick on the ground though
[09:13] <Laney> same
[09:13] <Laney> stopped now
[09:14] <davmor2> it's sticking here after last night but not a lot due to all the rain yesterday I guess
[09:15]  * Laney wants to go and sledge down the hill :(
[09:15] <Laney> not that I have one
[09:16] <Laney> but there's always kids to rob
[09:17] <davmor2> Laney: you can fit on a kids sledge man you are shorter than I thought :P  You'll be saying you just take your tea tray next ;)
[09:18] <Laney> knees up
[09:18] <Laney> wheeeeeeeeeeeee
[09:22] <davmor2> Laney: you need to where this hat.....what do you mean it makes you look like the mad hatter......It err makes you look dignified as you whiz down the hill on a tea tray
[09:31] <seb128> Trevinho, hey, the unity/yakkety SRU still has a bug that need to be verified but it's on hidpi, do you have any config where you could do that so the SRU can go to updates?
[09:32] <seb128> Laney, the glib/yakkety SRU has its bugs verified but is not copied over, looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html there are some autopkg issues, did you look at those? the SRU might need somebody to tell them if those need to be ignored
[09:34] <Laney> I didn't
[09:35] <Laney> If that is the issue, why does nobody say anything?
[09:35] <seb128> I'm just guessing it might be
[09:35] <seb128> but yeah, agreed with you
[09:37] <Laney> sil2100: ^- can you confirm/deny whether that is the problem maybe?
[09:38] <Laney> glib/xenial also needs verifying if anyone is on that
[09:39] <sil2100> Looking
[09:40] <sil2100> Laney: yeah, the autopkgtest failures would be the cause why it's not handled yet - are those failures expected?
[09:40] <Laney> Don't know
[09:41] <Laney> Can you maybe take it to the team to put something in your process to let developers know about that?
[09:41] <seb128> Laney, I can test glib/xenial, that seems to have autopkg issues as well though
[09:42] <Laney> I saw
[09:44] <Laney> it's much easier to look at the results from http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html than pending-sru
[09:46] <seb128> yeah, that has more than SRUs though
[09:46] <seb128> but at least you have the retry button then
[09:46] <seb128> which the SRU page doesn't include
[09:48] <seb128> bah, gnome-software :-/
[09:48] <seb128> my system is a bit outofdate, I updated a few things by clicking on the "update" button in the tab that list updates
[09:48] <Laney> does it?
[09:48] <seb128> first it's blanking the screen and just having a spinner in the top left corner after every update which is done
[09:48] <Laney> anyway, I just went to a pkg listed in pending-sru
[09:49] <seb128> and takes like 1 min to display content again
[09:49] <Laney> sil2100: please force-badtest nplan in yakkety
[09:49] <seb128> and after a few it just got stucked
[09:49] <seb128> it's spinning for 1.5 hours now
[09:49] <seb128> :-/
[09:50] <Laney> sounds worth debugging
[09:50] <seb128> yeah, trying
[09:53] <Laney> sil2100: and winff/xenial please
[09:53] <Laney> retrying all the others
[09:55] <sil2100> Laney: will try that in a minute
[09:55] <sil2100> Laney: I'll have a talk with the others from the SRU team but please note that I'm 'the new guy' there
[09:55] <Laney> sil2100: I'm guessing you use force hints like normal
[09:55] <Laney> yeah, sorry for picking on you :-)
[09:55] <Laney> happy friday, btw!
[10:11] <sil2100> Laney: ...ok, I think I don't know how to do that (sorry) ;)
[10:14] <Laney> sil2100: Can't find any evidence that you use hints actually
[10:15] <Laney> actually, yes I can, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial/
[10:15]  * sil2100 is a newb
[10:16] <Laney> It's not that active
[10:16] <Laney> hmm
[10:16] <sil2100> So that's where that is
[10:16] <Laney> You'd need to be added to the config to have a hint file
[10:18] <Laney> Probably something to chat about with your mentor(s)
[10:19] <sil2100> I'll poke around about that with Brian, thanks for pointing me to the right branch-set
[10:19] <sil2100> I didn't do that yet, still learning the ropes
[10:19] <flexiondotorg> seb128 Regarding LP: #1576424
[10:20] <flexiondotorg> I tested at the time, but didn't think I should verify my own fix.
[10:23] <seb128> flexiondotorg, well if nobody else is doing it ... but fair enough, I'm going to have a try again, it just didn't segfault for me when with the non patched version when I previously tried but maybe I did some step wrong
[10:23] <Laney> Yeah you can do it if nobody else does
[10:23] <flexiondotorg> Maybe a 64-bit only issue?
[10:23] <flexiondotorg> I only tested on 64-bit.
[10:24] <seb128> let me try again in a bit
[10:24] <flexiondotorg> I'll doing some other verifications today, so I can test on a clean install again.
[10:25] <seb128> extra testing is always welcome :-)
[10:31] <happyaron> seb128: hey just saw the IRC backlog, I've commented on the two bugs
[10:31] <seb128> happyaron, good morning, happy friday! great, I'm having a look but going for lunch in a bit so review is probably for once I'm back
[10:32] <happyaron> have a nice lunch!
[10:33] <seb128> thanks
[10:36] <seb128> happyaron, the extra patch which is re-enabled, I don't understand what it's for and it's likely going to be the same for the SRU team, you know the package so if you think it's needed you need to put some rational at least in the changelog explaining the issue and how it solves it, even better if you have a launchpad report
[10:37] <happyaron> ok
[10:37] <happyaron> I'll put in changelog, there's no launchpad report cuz it's a patch inherited from Debian
[10:38] <seb128> well maybe somebody reported a bug/problem which is resolved by the change
[10:38] <seb128> well, up to you
[10:39] <seb128> on that note lunch! bbl
[10:51] <Trevinho> seb128: hey... Nope, andyrock has
[11:12] <flexiondotorg> seb128 Is there something specific you need testing with NM from proposed on Yakkety?
[11:36] <jbicha> Laney: sorry about that, I didn't realize you updated gnome-software yesterday until I got the rejection email from LP and then I had already done the work so…
[11:41] <Laney> jbicha: If you'd waited I could have at least pushed, and we could have had a discussion
[11:42] <Laney> Oh well, it's too late now
[11:42] <Laney> sil2100: all the tests other than the two I mentioned are now green, hopefully good to release glib2.0 at your leisure
[11:42] <Laney> well, xenial needs verifying still
[11:44] <jbicha> Laney: how would you have done it differently? would you have rebased and force-pushed to git.gnome.org?
[11:46] <jbicha> because my biggest issue was being able to easily figure out what were the Ubuntu patches; maintaining it in git like that was different but otherwise ok
[11:47] <Laney> jbicha: I meant the packaging branch
[11:47] <Laney> Could also have taught you about the release process if you'd wanted to know
[11:49] <jbicha> I had complained a few times about not being able to decipher the xenial and yakkety branches; zesty was easy because robert put all the patches on top
[11:54] <jbicha> thanks for identifying the deadlock fix; I had looked at updating gnome-software last month but stopped because of the regression and I hadn't looked until yesterday to try to figure out what had broken
[11:54] <Laney> 'sok
[11:55] <Laney> I hang out in the upstream IRC channel and work with them
[11:55] <Laney> Richard and I figured it out pretty quickly
[12:39] <hikiko> seb128, Trevinho could you get a look at those:
[12:40] <hikiko>  https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/unity/unity.lowgfx-2017/+merge/314695
[12:40] <Trevinho> k
[12:40] <hikiko> https://code.launchpad.net/~hikiko/unity-control-center/unity-control-center.lowgfx/+merge/314696
[12:42] <hikiko> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-AX1QLIPXw that's what they are supposed to do together
[12:47] <Trevinho> hikiko: looking at the video, if the settings aren't there I'd instead just hide the group instead of graying out elements
[12:48] <hikiko> this way the user will know there's no new lowgfx
[12:48] <hikiko> so he can go to ccsm
[12:49] <hikiko> it's for feedback
[12:59] <Trevinho> hikiko|ln: indeed, but if there's nothing, then it's already an indication of that.
[12:59] <seb128> flexiondotorg, no specific testing no, just making sure it works and has no obvious regression
[13:21] <flexiondotorg> seb128 OK.
[13:21] <flexiondotorg> Just heading out for a bit.
[13:21] <flexiondotorg> I'll test when I get back.
[16:14] <tjaalton> seb128: btw, my pulseaudio woes were due to sbuild mounting a tmpfs on /dev/shm
[16:14] <tjaalton> which was not cleaned on exit
[16:15] <seb128> tjaalton, oh, good to know, I though about it yesterday and forgot to ask, thanks for keeping me updated
[16:15] <tjaalton> modified it to do a bind-mount instead
[16:21] <seb128> k
[17:53] <Trevinho> Mirv: hey, could you please consider to add this debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/qt/+bug/1600136/comments/10 ?
[18:07] <Laney> night dudettes and dudes
[18:08] <Laney> happy weekend!
[18:25] <seb128> night Laney, have a nice w.e desktopers
[18:26] <flexiondotorg> seb128 Having a good weekend.
[18:26] <flexiondotorg> No wifi issues so far :-)
[18:37] <willcooke> night all