| rmcadams | With "Add Chassis" - with the type virsh - should it add all libvirt machines it finds on a host? | 04:20 |
|---|---|---|
| rmcadams | I can't find anything that covers it via my google searches... or in the docs. | 04:21 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| mup | Bug #1657375 opened: RFE: DNS and DHCP <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657375> | 09:31 |
| mup | Bug #1657378 opened: RFE: SSH Port and Listen <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657378> | 09:31 |
| === jamespag` is now known as jamespage | ||
| n8behavior | Anyone getting "failed to detect a valid IP address from -1"? This is a fresh install of MaaS 2.1.1+bzr5544 on a fresh/update-to-date Ubuntu server 16.04.1. | 13:38 |
| n8behavior | Also have more deets here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/873106/failed-to-detect-a-valid-ip-address-from-1 | 13:39 |
| n8behavior | Thought I'd run the table before filing a bug report | 13:39 |
| mup | Bug #1657471 opened: [2.1] 400 BAD REQUEST: Unrecognised signature: method=GET op=is_registered <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657471> | 14:25 |
| mup | Bug #1657471 changed: [2.1] 400 BAD REQUEST: Unrecognised signature: method=GET op=is_registered <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657471> | 14:34 |
| mup | Bug #1657471 opened: [2.1] 400 BAD REQUEST: Unrecognised signature: method=GET op=is_registered <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657471> | 14:37 |
| mup | Bug #1657491 opened: Several IPs assigned to the same iface in the DB due to 'free' leases <sts> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657491> | 15:20 |
| === BlackDex_ is now known as BlackDex | ||
| mup | Bug #1657520 opened: Cannot add device with static IP via the API <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657520> | 16:50 |
| mup | Bug #1657520 changed: Cannot add device with static IP via the API <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657520> | 17:02 |
| mup | Bug #1657520 opened: Cannot add device with static IP via the API <MAAS:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657520> | 17:14 |
| capncrunch4me | I have 400 servers to provision using MAAS, can I do this over a single L2 VLAN on a /22 network using MAAS? | 18:17 |
| capncrunch4me | what am I going to need to scale out to accomodate this? | 18:54 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| pmatulis | capncrunch4me, i don't see any problem using maas for what you want to do | 19:01 |
| capncrunch4me | normal 2-node HA install should do the trick? | 19:01 |
| capncrunch4me | i mean, it strikes me that maas really is only hit hard is during provisioning a node | 19:01 |
| capncrunch4me | im not suggesting mass’ing up 400 nodes at once, we would stagger provisioning | 19:01 |
| pmatulis | capncrunch4me, there are docs for implementing HA in maas but, apart from that, i don't think you'll need anything special | 19:03 |
| capncrunch4me | k cool, thanks | 19:05 |
| capncrunch4me | just wanted to make sure it scaled out of the box | 19:05 |
| capncrunch4me | 400 nodes is quite a bit different than 50 | 19:05 |
| pmatulis | capncrunch4me, i think you you should consider a 2nd rack controller after 1000 nodes | 19:06 |
| capncrunch4me | ok | 19:07 |
| n8behavior | Fresh install of MaaS on 14.04 does not work out-of-the-box. Anyone able to successfully package install? | 20:41 |
| mup | Bug #1657577 opened: 2.1.3: Dashboard page crashes <oil> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657577> | 20:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!