[04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-62.83] (core, kernel)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-36.38] (core, kernel)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-1ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1.0.4-1ubuntu0.16.10.2] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> "Unable to identify file foobar.buildinfo (devel) in changes.
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error."
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, ^^ is it worth a bug against launchpad? I know dpkg is not merged yet :)
[10:26] <xnox> .... build source package on ubuntu....
[10:38] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: sure; I agree that we should accept and store buildinfo files
[10:38] <infinity> cjwatson: And, to xnox's point, when I merge dpkg, should I neuter that feature until LP doesn't barf on it? :P
[10:38] <infinity> (I'm going to do so very soon)
[10:39] <xnox> cjwatson, i think at the moment dak silently discards buildinfo files.
[10:39] <cjwatson> infinity: might be a good plan
[10:39] <cjwatson> xnox: sure, but LP should store them
[10:39] <cjwatson> we have a librarian
[10:40] <cjwatson> (store doesn't mean publish, that's quite a different matter)
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, but the point is: do I need to file a bug or nothing?
[10:41] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: bug please
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, thanks for that, I see many package starting to build-depend on new dpkg
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[10:41] <infinity> Versioned build-deps on dpkg make me a sad panda.
[10:41] <cjwatson> I'll get it fixed soon, but (a) I'm on leave and (b) we're in the middle of upgrading our buildbot to cope with xenial guests and it's currently in a broken state in the middle, so it may take a few days
[10:42] <infinity> I guess it's people who think that's the "right" way to get the newer buildflags defaults. :/
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, sbuild uses features of new dpkg
[10:43] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Oh, sbuild is a special snowflake here.  I thought you meant random packages that have nothing to do with build toolchains.
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> "S:fieldname" is available on new dpkg and used in bcron
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I want a new dpkg feature for cmake-extras foo
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I already have 3 use cases for new dpkg, and moreover switch PIE default to on everywhere? :P
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> this will make me happy and drop the libpng1.6 hacky rules
[10:45] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: (BTW, please attach an example changes file to your bug)
[10:45] <cjwatson> (and ideally an example buildinfo file too)
[10:47] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, an example can be a link to my sbuild merge on my ppa?
[10:47] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/11887168
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-62.83]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-36.38]
[10:50] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: that will do I guess
[10:50] <cjwatson> (but in the bug, I'll forget it on IRC)
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> already opened and added to the bug
[10:51] <LocutusOfBorg> also infinity I like this fix http://bugs.debian.org/844348
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpdk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [16.11-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: crash (xenial-proposed/main) [7.1.4-1ubuntu4 => 7.1.4-1ubuntu5] (core)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpdk [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [16.11-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpdk [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [16.11-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> still no AA around? :)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpdk [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [16.11-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:55] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, thanks for the php-imagick fix
[11:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I was looking at the code, but I didn't find the error, and then I saw your upload :)
[11:55] <LocutusOfBorg> testsuite retried
[11:55] <LocutusOfBorg> still emacs24/emacs25 are blocking it, not sure if an AA can do anything
[11:56] <LocutusOfBorg> oh now it fails for other reasons :(
[11:57] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: the php-imagick test still fails
[11:59] <LocutusOfBorg> http://pecl.php.net/package/imagick/3.4.3RC2
[12:02] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we can ask debian to upload that RC2
[12:04] <jbicha> I didn't see anything in the changelog that seemed to help with the test
[12:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I sent a mail to the maintainer and cc'd you
[12:04] <LocutusOfBorg> github commit lits is mentioning a lot of tests
[12:08] <mapreri> xnox: FYI, Debian now stores the .buildinfo files too, and TTBOMK we already have several thousands of them for > 200 MB (I'd need to grep IRC logs for more precise numbers).  Just they aren't exported in a public directory.
[12:29] <fossfreedom_> Hi all - please can someone add Ubuntu Budgie to the ISO Tracker QA system please?  We would like to participate in Alpha 2.  TIA
[12:32] <Laney> jbicha: LocutusOfBorg: The -extra thing isn't installed. It's only a recommends of the thing that is now Test-Depends, so either switch that to something which will install it (the -dev) or add Restrictions: needs-recommends.
[12:40] <jbicha> Laney: thank you, I'll do needs-recommends
[12:58] <bittin_> Hello do you know when 16.4.2 is released?
[12:58] <fossfreedom_> cyphermox: sorry for the direct ping - since your name was the last entry in the changelog... any chance you (or forward to someone) can have a look at Ubuntu Budgie's ubiquity-slideshow merge proposal please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/+bug/1644976
[13:05] <fossfreedom_> bittin_: release has been postponed to the 2nd of Feb - polishing off some HWE issues apparently
[13:09] <bittin_> fossfreedom_: ah alright thanks for info
[13:18] <LocutusOfBorg> nice, so I have chances to see virtualbox go in xenial-updates :)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biboumi [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.0-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biboumi [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [4.0-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biboumi [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [4.0-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biboumi [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [4.0-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [i386] (zesty-proposed) [16.11-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biboumi [i386] (zesty-proposed) [4.0-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [16.11-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [16.11-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [16.11-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [i386] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [i386] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [i386] (zesty-proposed) [7.2.7-2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcec [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg1-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1:4.0~svn291432-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1:4.0~svn291432-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mydumper [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.1-5]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oclgrind [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [16.10-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1:4.0~svn291432-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oclgrind [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [16.10-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse-el [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [3.20+dfsg-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oclgrind [i386] (zesty-proposed) [16.10-1]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oclgrind [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [16.10-1]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tendermint-go-crypto [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0~git20160724.0.4b11d62-1]
[14:11] <rbasak> Could someone force-badtest dovecot/1:2.2.25-1ubuntu2/armhf please? This is a known unstable test. It takes an unreasonable number of retry attempts to get it to pass. This is blocking mysql-5.7 migration.
[14:11] <rbasak> I did look into it but I couldn't find the race :-/
[14:35] <cpaelzer> rbasak: we should think on disableing the test for arm on the next merge
[14:35] <cpaelzer> it is causing so much more trouble than it helps
[14:53] <tjaalton> could someone remove tomcat 8.5 from zesty-proposed, it breaks dogtag-pki and blocks updates to it
[14:54] <tjaalton> and mark it blocked for now
[14:54] <tjaalton> so that it won't get autosynced at least
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.13+16.10ubuntu2]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.13+16.04ubuntu2]
[16:14] <flocculant> fossfreedom_: you about?
[16:14] <fossfreedom_> flocculant: hi - yes
[16:15] <flocculant> fossfreedom_: rather than spam here - take it to query?
[16:23] <teward> SRU team, can I bounce a question off of you?  A request came in to backport updated NGINX to Xenial and Trusty, would that be better suited to go through SRU or standard backports process?
[16:23] <teward> for Trusty it'd be a substantial version bump
[16:24] <teward> and a lot of different feature revisions...
[16:24] <teward> (Xenial, not so much, that could qualify under micro-release since we already track nginx stable there)
[16:24] <teward> (same for Yakkety)
[16:24] <teward> and by 'backport' i mean to update nginx in those releases to a newer stable branchl
[16:24] <teward> s/branchl/version/
[16:28] <rbasak> teward: depends on the feature changes I think. I think feature changes would be frowned upon.
[16:29] <teward> rbasak: then Trusty would have to get a standard backport; Xenial and Yakkety could get 1.10.2 probably under the MRE rules.  Though, I will have to stab the debian/rules at some point to work over some pretty awful build failures I witnessed
[16:29] <teward> (and no I am not doing the dynamic module stuff for Xenial or Yakkety yet(
[16:29] <teward> rbasak: given that Trusty has 1.4.6, and we're at 1.10.x, I'm pretty certain we're going to have a lot of changes
[16:29] <teward> and I think a package drop somewhere in there
[16:30] <teward> (not sure on the last one there)
[16:35] <bdmurray> sil2100: If you have a moment look at ironic in the yakkety queue
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-vivid [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.19.0-80.88~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-62.83~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:47] <sil2100> bdmurray: looking
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gss-ntlmssp (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1 => 0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gss-ntlmssp (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1 => 0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:55] <sil2100> bdmurray: hmm, ok, so the package looks okayish (strange that they modify the changes list in the source for 6.2.1, but well), but we can't approve it since 6.2.2 is still not in zesty
[16:55] <bdmurray> sil2100: right, not in zesty so in limbo
[16:57] <sil2100> I wonder, will there be a zesty release in the end? SInce I see it's marked Invalid for the dev series
[16:57] <sil2100> ...and should we care about that or is that more of the maintainers thing?
[17:00] <sil2100> bdmurray: you have any other package that I could still review, or should I just pick some now from the queue as it goes?
[17:04] <bdmurray> sil2100: I don't have anything specific at the moment.
[17:11] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, since I know the codebase, let me take a look at ubuntu-image now
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] <sil2100> barry: uh oh! A small nitpick for the ubuntu-image SRUs!
[17:17] <barry> sil2100: okay! what's up?
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] <sil2100> barry: two of the bugs that you usually hide from appearing on the SRU dashboard are now in proper LP format so they appear in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed
[17:17] <sil2100> barry: e.g. the two bugs for the role: handling ;)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] <barry> sil2100: oh damn, i think that was a retro-merge
[17:18] <barry> i suppose i can regen 0.14 for x and y
[17:19] <sil2100> barry: sorry for that, that would make things easier as otherwise we'll have unnecessary bugs appearing in pending-sru's
[17:19] <barry> sil2100: yeah, no worries
[17:19] <barry> let's do it right!
[17:19] <sil2100> I guess we could release as is, but we'd either have to change the bugs for SRU compatibility or have someone remembering to ignore those - so yeah, this would make it more clean ;)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:20] <sil2100> Thanks!
[17:20] <sil2100> (sorry, first ubuntu-image release I'm reviewing and it seems I'm bringing bad luck)
[17:20] <sil2100> ;)
[17:20] <barry> sil2100: or maybe i snuck that in to test you :)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dropwizard-metrics [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] <sil2100> Oooh
[17:21] <sil2100> Tricky!
[17:21] <sil2100> ;)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: seafile [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+git20161227.5f030ac-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simgrid [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.14.159-1] (no packageset)
[18:13] <bdmurray> slangasek: did you look at all the releasable things in pending-sru?
[18:16] <slangasek> bdmurray: for my perceived value of releasable, yes
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.7]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-1 => 0.18.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[18:43] <flocculant> re fossfreedom's request for things to be added to iso tracker earlier - I've done the majority of it for budgie - they have downloads/testsuites etc now - not sure about the budgie release team/product owner bit - balloons was looking at that but wasn't sure of who it needed to be
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-qrencode [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.01-5ubuntu1]
[18:52] <bdmurray> jbicha: Should there be something about testing ostree in bug 1656712?
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.3+git50-g3c0349b-2~ubuntu15.10.1]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-1 => 0.19.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[19:08] <balloons> whomever will own the release responsibilities can recieve the permission for budgie in the tracker
[19:11] <wxl> permission seems to be given manually, or at least not by an existing team on lp, at least if i look at ~lubuntu-product-managers/
[19:11] <wxl> me thinks maybe making a team would be wise
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-applet [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.2.6-0ubuntu1]
[19:12] <wxl> it also might be a good improvement to make whatever permission we get only affect particular suites
[19:12] <wxl> not like anyone has exploited that (and sometimes it has been used to the benefit of particular flavors) but still
[19:16] <clivejo> KDE Apps 16.12.1 (minus PIM) are incoming
[19:16]  * acheronuk hides
[19:18] <tsimonq2> *appears from the void*
[19:19] <tsimonq2> infinity, slangasek: Since it appears that I'm helping with Alpha 2, who's going to be on the Nusakan side of things?
[19:23] <tsimonq2> (technically I'm not back yet, taking a break from finals studying, but I wanted to ping about it to make sure someone other than me is thinking about it)
[19:23] <wxl> tsimonq2: when you do get it figured out, we need to get budgie access to the tracker (see above)
[19:24] <tsimonq2> wxl: Ok, chatting with David now on their Gitter channel.
[19:24] <wxl> tsimonq2: great. the issue is currently not willingness on their end, so much as it is on release team's end as far as getting them access XD
[19:25] <wxl> tsimonq2: i DID suggest we make those with access to the tracker into a team to make everything a bit more clear and perhaps make it clear who to actually talk to to get added, but that's an aside
[19:26] <tsimonq2> wxl: OR we could make it sort of a "while-your'e-at-it-pretty-please-with-a-cherry-on-top-I'll-buy-beer" XD
[19:26] <tsimonq2> *you're
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (yakkety-proposed) [10.2.5-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[19:26] <wxl> heheh yep
[19:27] <tsimonq2> wxl: Anyways, yeah, good idea.
[19:27] <wxl> probably not putting the cherry in the beer, though.
[19:27] <wxl> anyways, kubuntu and lubuntu are both in
[19:27] <tsimonq2> Why not? Give it a little plastic stick with an umbrella... :P
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:27] <tsimonq2> wxl: Yep, I volunteered us both on the ML last night.
[19:28] <wxl> thx
[19:28] <tsimonq2> np
[19:31] <flocculant> wxl: access to tracker is sorted - just budgie release team to do
[19:31]  * wxl sighs
[19:31] <wxl> apparently my beers weern't sufficient :)
[19:31] <tsimonq2> Anyways, back to work, I have a teacher that I Really Really Don't Like Right Now that assigned us a page of homework after our 6 page final, due on the first day of the semester...
[19:31] <tsimonq2> I'll keep IRC up though, if you need me, ping.
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.4-1ubuntu0.16.10.2]
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdegraphics-mobipocket [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freshplayerplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.3.5-1ubuntu3.1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spyder [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.0.2+dfsg1-0ubuntu0.1]
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.10-0ubuntu1]
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spyder [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+dfsg1-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcddb [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkcompactdisc [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:37] <jbicha> bdmurray: my plan to test ostree was just to see if flatpak worked, if that's fine with you, I'll mention that on the bug
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:40] <jbicha> bdmurray: for the flatpak sru, I need to work with -security about bug 1657357 for yakkety
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: marble [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (yakkety-proposed) [12.0.5-0ubuntu0.16.10.2]
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (xenial-proposed) [12.0.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (xenial-proposed/main) [11.2.0-1ubuntu2.2 => 12.0.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (yakkety-proposed/main) [12.0.3-1ubuntu2 => 12.0.5-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (core, xorg)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cantor [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cantor [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-1.8-race-detector-runtime (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu1]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cantor [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cantor [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cantor [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kipi [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)