| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === manjo` is now known as manjo | ||
| elopio | buffer 10 | 04:58 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | good morning | 06:45 |
| === hikiko_ is now known as hikiko | ||
| === synapse is now known as Guest89004 | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| pitti | mdeslaur, xnox: FTR: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020601 only affects systemd 228, thus no debian or ubuntu release/pocket/backports/etc. | 11:37 |
| ubottu | bugzilla.suse.com bug 1020601 in Incidents "VUL-0: CVE-2016-10156: systemd: world writable suid files local root vulnerability" [Major,Confirmed] | 11:37 |
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
| mdeslaur | thanks pitti! | 12:00 |
| === mardy_ is now known as mardy | ||
| mdeslaur | @pilot in | 12:15 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Yakkety Yak (16.10) Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-yakkety | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: mdeslaur | ||
| === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: hey! I see there's a libibverbs package on Bileto from you ready for release - you want me to release it for you? | 13:26 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I have a few rather minimal merges done and in progress | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: do you want to review them still, or do you think we can upload and just merge if it is really down to a trivial delta? | 14:05 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: I'd like to move towards getting peer review for all uploads, but I don't think there's any need for trivial things right now. | 14:06 |
| rbasak | Might as well start with the large stuff. | 14:06 |
| rbasak | There may be a squid3 merge review coming your way soon :-) | 14:06 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: makes sense - I'll go on with the trivials to get out of our way then | 14:07 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I'll trade squid for a multipath review :-P | 14:07 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: in fact my personal timeline says I'll upload multipath on Friday as-is to get some practical testing if there is no review | 14:07 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: thanks for the proactive check, yeah ticket 2395 should be safe (minor upstream release, minimal delta) | 14:08 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: I think that's fine. If no reviewers appear after a while, just land it. | 14:08 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: except I wanted to try hitting publish myself and see what permissions might break | 14:08 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: do you have upload rights for this package? | 14:09 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: anyway, nothing wrong will happen if you press publish, it'll tell you if you have the rights to do it or not | 14:09 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: yeah I should have upload rights, let me check | 14:10 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: ok, it didn't reject me right away - now copying it seems | 14:11 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: "INFO Succeeded in 0m 6s" | 14:11 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: you might keep an extra eye open since this might be the first time a non core-dev hit publish - just in case anything weird comes up | 14:12 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: I guess all looks good! | 14:12 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 14:13 |
| cpaelzer | \o/ | 14:13 |
| juliank | python-apt 1.4 beta is coming, but there never was a 1.2 or 1.3 (not even a final 1.1) :) | 14:45 |
| juliank | So don't get confused, the version number is just matching the apt release series it requires! | 14:45 |
| cpaelzer | is that a known issue of sbuild dep8 tests atm "FAIL stderr: W: Ignoring Provides line with non-equal DepCompareOp for package wine" | 14:48 |
| cpaelzer | hitting that with an update to exim4 but I doubt to have caused that (https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty-ci-train-ppa-service-2394/zesty/amd64/s/sbuild/20170124_111649_92763@/log.gz) | 14:48 |
| juliank | cpaelzer: Sounds like a bug in wine | 14:48 |
| juliank | cpaelzer: It also happens if you run apt update on a recent zesty system | 14:49 |
| juliank | Hmm, not sure why that happens. | 14:50 |
| juliank | oh wait, wrong chroot | 14:51 |
| * juliank is trying to find the broken package | 14:51 | |
| juliank | Package: wine-stable | 14:52 |
| juliank | Version: 1.8.6-3ubuntu1 | 14:52 |
| juliank | Provides: wine (>= 1:1) | 14:52 |
| juliank | Oh, come on | 14:52 |
| juliank | jbicha: ^ you merged that? | 14:52 |
| juliank | jbicha: I assume that should be wine (= ${source:Version}) | 14:53 |
| juliank | Or wine (= 1.8) or something | 14:54 |
| cpaelzer | oh, thanks juliank for looing | 15:00 |
| === dannf` is now known as dannf | ||
| ginggs | juliank, jbicha: looking at the previous versions, it was just 'Provides: wine' | 15:10 |
| juliank | ginggs: Oh, good to know. I'm not sure what the >= 1:1 is trying to achieve - I also just noticed the epoch | 15:11 |
| juliank | maybe it should provide wine with an epoch? | 15:11 |
| juliank | because some other "wine" package had an epoch | 15:11 |
| ginggs | juliank: we are trying to get rid of the epoch | 15:11 |
| juliank | In that case, it could Provide: wine (= 1:${source:Version}) | 15:12 |
| ginggs | juliank: hence the renaming of wine -> wine-stable until the next ubuntu LTS | 15:12 |
| juliank | ginggs: Right, but currently the provides is broken. It either needs to become unversioned or a useful version provide. | 15:13 |
| juliank | wine (= 1:${source:Version}) is a bit ugly, but has the advantage of simply just saying wine-stable X provides wine with the same version an epoch 1 | 15:13 |
| ginggs | juliank: shall i just revert to 'Provides: wine'? i can upload shortly | 15:17 |
| juliank | ginggs: Well, I think it's better than keeping it broken. I'm not sure what the intention was, or if it was intentional at all. | 15:18 |
| ginggs | juliank: ok, reverting now. i'd better check src:wine-development too | 15:19 |
| Laney | juliank: meow, got a second to check on my sanity? | 15:30 |
| Laney | juliank: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/303682921/buildlog_ubuntu_zesty_amd64_kubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:31 |
| Laney | juliank: or schroot -c zesty-amd64 -u root --directory / -- sh -c 'apt -y install appstream; apt -o Acquire::IndexTargets::deb::DEP-11-icons-hidpi::DefaultEnabled=true -o Acquire::IndexTargets::deb::DEP-11-icons::DefaultEnabled=true update' | 15:31 |
| juliank | Laney: Ah | 15:31 |
| Laney | Don't undertand why the hash sum mismatch | 15:31 |
| juliank | Have you seen http://bugs.debian.org/838441 | 15:32 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 838441 in apt "apt-get update fails with "Hash Sum mismatch", mixes hashes between tar.gz and tar file" [Normal,Open] | 15:32 |
| juliank | there's a bug somewhere in APT causing it to take the uncompressed hashes for the compressed file, but no constant reproducer yet | 15:32 |
| Laney | juliank: ah right, nope | 15:33 |
| ginggs | src:wine-development has 'Provides: wine' | 15:33 |
| Laney | that one up there works for me, let me see what you want | 15:33 |
| Laney | sec, got to go give a weekly report | 15:33 |
| juliank | Laney: I added zesty-sec to my Deb system, and can't reproduce it, so it's officially complicated. | 15:45 |
| Laney | juliank: Hmmmm | 15:47 |
| Laney | for me it happens with *only* zesty-security in there | 15:47 |
| Laney | which is good for reducing the size of the output ... | 15:48 |
| juliank | Laney: Hmm, not happening for me | 15:51 |
| juliank | Ah wait | 15:51 |
| juliank | it only downloaded the inrelease file | 15:51 |
| juliank | Laney: The problem happens while copying the file from partial to the main directory | 15:52 |
| Laney | juliank: you reproed it? | 15:53 |
| juliank | APT tells the copy method it should expect uncompressed hashes for the compressed file | 15:53 |
| juliank | Laney: No, but that's what the log say | 15:53 |
| juliank | s | 15:53 |
| juliank | E: Failed to fetch copy:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_zesty-security_main_dep11_icons-64x64.tar.gz Hash Sum mismatch | 15:54 |
| Laney | Also it only happens if I enable both the IndexTargets | 15:54 |
| juliank | Ah | 15:57 |
| Laney | ximion added that in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/303563290/plasma-discover_5.8.5-0ubuntu1_5.8.5-3ubuntu1.diff.gz | 15:59 |
| Laney | bet that's why it's now happening for kubuntu | 15:59 |
| juliank | Laney: Oh well, it might not actually be coppying but just an implementation artefact. | 16:01 |
| juliank | Laney: Maybe talk to donkult in #debian-apt on OFTC, and add some logs with Debug::Acquire::Transaction set | 16:04 |
| juliank | and take a copy of the repo for further debugging :) | 16:05 |
| juliank | Debug::pkgAcquire::Auth | 16:07 |
| juliank | Debug::Acquire::HashSumMismatch" | 16:07 |
| juliank | Laney: ^ some more debugging options | 16:07 |
| juliank | I'll give repro a last try | 16:09 |
| juliank | And now I can repro :) | 16:10 |
| Laney | oh sweet | 16:11 |
| cpaelzer | infinity: I looked at liblockfile merge, but I wonder if dropping that old Delta would be fine - especially since this would make liblockfile a sync then. | 16:16 |
| cpaelzer | infinity: TL;DR is just dh/dh_auto_configure cross build safe enough these days? I'm not a cross build expert so I wanted to ask and the old delta is yours. | 16:16 |
| cpaelzer | infinity: Also it wasn't merged for a long time - if there is a hidden reason please let me know. | 16:16 |
| cpaelzer | this is the old delta and the currend d/rules http://paste.ubuntu.com/23858458/ | 16:17 |
| cpaelzer | hmm just checked the dates on the upstream changelog - there seems to be a flurry of activity just recently | 16:20 |
| renn0xtk9 | What do you do if you have TPM_Error code 7 (i.e. you can not boot anymore ) and you have no recovery mode in boot ( Note that I never choose to deactivate it so it is a choice of the distro maker, which I would like to understand as welll....) | 16:21 |
| cpaelzer | that explains why we had 1.09 for so long | 16:21 |
| mdeslaur | @pilot out | 16:32 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Yakkety Yak (16.10) Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-yakkety | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: | ||
| barry | davmor2: howdy. just wanted to let you know that i haven't forgotten about aptdaemon. been having some trouble with its autopkgtests so i'm trying to suss that out so it won't fail to promote in zesty once i've uploaded it | 16:43 |
| davmor2 | barry: awesome thanks dude, seb128 flexiondotorg ^ | 16:44 |
| seb128 | davmor2, barry: thanks | 16:44 |
| barry | davmor2, flexiondotorg, seb128 you can test the change in lp:aptdaemon but the package isn't yet ready. i added the fix as a quilt patch in the packaging because i don't think there's been an upstream release of aptdaemon in a long time (probably never will be; i think it's been more or less orphaned) | 16:46 |
| seb128 | barry, you could probably take over it/update the vcs if you wanted | 16:47 |
| barry | seb128: it's the "if" that's the problem :) | 16:47 |
| seb128 | :-) | 16:47 |
| seb128 | barry, well in theory foundations is supposed to maintain it... | 16:47 |
| seb128 | barry, or somebody should look at deprecating it for good and replace it by e.g packagekit on the default install | 16:48 |
| barry | seb128: true. i certainly don't mind helping out in cases like this, i just don't want to assume ownership of the upstream and package :/ | 16:48 |
| seb128 | right | 16:48 |
| barry | seb128: yes +1 to that | 16:48 |
| barry | pretty sure it's been dropped in debian, so we're looking at gnome-software, language-selector-gnome, oem-config-gtk, and sessioninstaller as revdeps | 16:49 |
| barry | aaaannyway | 16:50 |
| coreycb | bdmurray, hi can you reject the barbican upload from 2017-01-09 from the xenial review queue? had to add a missing bug # to the changelog. | 18:09 |
| coreycb | bdmurray, thanks | 18:22 |
| jbicha | ginggs: thanks for fixing the wine merge | 19:19 |
| ginggs | jbicha: np! | 19:22 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === alexisb is now known as alexisb-afk | ||
| === alexisb-afk is now known as alexisb | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!