[06:41] <errr> Using MAAS Version 2.1.1+bzr5544-0ubuntu1 (16.04.1) is there a limit to the number of machines returned by the API in a single request?
[07:37] <brendand> errr, not that i know of
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban
[07:54] <errr> from what I could find in the source code thats what it was looking like to me but I wasnt 100% sure
=== rvba` is now known as rvba
[09:36] <aaran> Hi, tried to get support regarding an issue yesterday however there was no one around so I will ask again
[09:36] <aaran> when i tell a client to network boot it gives the error Unable to locate configuration file
[10:00] <aaran> After restarting the server the client now boots into a ubuntu instance however the server is showing commissioning until it fails
[19:49] <g3> hey yo!
[19:50] <g3> Anyone around?
[20:01] <g3> =(
[20:08] <errr> is it possible to provision based on tags a machine has been given?
[20:08] <errr> Using MAAS Version 2.1.1+bzr5544-0ubuntu1 (16.04.1)
[20:12] <g3> setting up maas for the first itme, currently stuck at One cluster is not connected to the region.
[20:13] <g3> Currently have a cluster controller setup at a network interface handling dhcp and dns
[20:14] <g3> and /etc/maas/clusterd.conf reflects that information
[20:21] <g3> Hmmm apt installed 1.9
[21:08] <pmatulis> errr, how are you provisioning?
[21:09] <pmatulis> g3, i suggest using maas 2.1 if you're setting up for the first time
[21:10] <g3> Yeah I just realized I can't use Trusty for that
[21:10] <g3> So I'll have to upgrade another server first.
[21:18] <roaksoax> errr: yes
[21:19] <roaksoax> errr: you can 'allocate' a machine based on tags in order to deploy it
[21:19] <roaksoax> errr: so you can allocate + deploy the machine
=== menn0_ is now known as menn0
[21:39] <andrew-ii> What could cause a node to properly boot via PXE but not enlist?
[22:03] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: lack of network access ? or not being able to contact the maas server ?
[22:04] <andrew-ii> It seems to do ok for the most part
[22:04] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: do you have a console log I can see ?
[22:04] <andrew-ii> It boots under maas direction, and only seems to trip up at the end during the enlist stage
[22:05] <andrew-ii> Lemme double check if rsyslog captured any of the end bits
[22:07] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: if you could get me an error output or the whole output for the matter, I would be able to have an idea of what's wrong
[22:08] <andrew-ii> Neat - is there a preferred place to put a log? (It's about 3.9MB at the moment)
[22:08] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: not really, a pastebin would be good
[22:08] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: if you have the snippet of the failure, that's better
[22:09] <andrew-ii> Let me sed out the ureadahead bits and see if that makes it more obvious
[22:13] <andrew-ii> Sorry for the delay - here's the last attempt: http://pastebin.com/FkMnpY8f
[22:14] <andrew-ii> The strange bit is that I've got 4 other machines that commissioned happily. Just this one seems to get confounded.
[22:16] <andrew-ii> Note that all the machines are different - it's a horrific Frankenstein's monster of boxes
[22:20] <roaksoax> andrew-ii:
[22:20] <roaksoax> Jan 25 21:56:24 maas-enlisting-node cloud-init[2325]: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 400 BAD REQUEST
[22:20] <roaksoax> Jan 25 21:56:24 maas-enlisting-node cloud-init[2325]: + maas-enlist --serverurl http://10.222.222.10:5240/MAAS/api/2.0/machines/
[22:21] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: can the machines access 10.222.222.10 ?
[22:21] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: or is that in a different subnet
[22:21] <andrew-ii> They should - the maas region/rack controller is 10.222.222.10 and all the machines are on the same set of switches
[22:22] <andrew-ii> That's the PXE address, at least
[22:22] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: right, so tail -f /var/log/maas/regiond.log while that happens, is there any error ?
[22:23] <roaksoax> andrew-ii: my guess, however, is that the machine itself cannot ping the above IP
[22:23] <andrew-ii> Just did it and literally caught it
[22:24] <andrew-ii> I think this is what you mean? 2017-01-25 16:22:17 -: [info] ::ffff:10.222.222.50 - - [25/Jan/2017:22:22:16 +0000] "POST /MAAS/api/2.0/machines/ HTTP/1.1" 400 119 "-" "curl/7.47.0"
[22:25] <andrew-ii> Running another commission attempt to see if I can see it live
[22:33] <andrew-ii> cat /tmp/enlist.out yields empty string, which is a bit disappointing
[22:43] <andrew-ii> I think it was related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1520645
[22:45] <andrew-ii> Basically, I rebuilt the machine, this time adding *all* four NIC MACs instead of just the first. I guess it was attempting to phone home to MAAS via the second NIC, and that MAC wasn't included yet.
[22:53] <andrew-ii> At any rate, thanks roaksoax! I was wondering how it could possibly boot but not be able to enlist. I guess the node just didn't reply with the first NIC =/
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk
[23:16] <g3> Okay I'm now on 2.0
[23:16] <g3> Should I upgrade to 2.1?
[23:44] <g3> So what does an untagged VLAN mean exactly?
[23:44] <g3> I setup a subnet with dhcp on a specific port
[23:46] <andrew-ii> An untagged VLAN is basically stuff without VLAN tags/numbers
[23:47] <andrew-ii> I'm not sure about dhcp ports (I'm currently trying to get a node to contact the outside world through the region controller)
[23:48] <g3> I see
[23:49] <g3> So now that I have MAAS setup with a subnet serving DHCP on a fabric.
[23:49] <g3> next setup would be to try to provision a node?
[23:51] <andrew-ii> I'd give it a shot! I think PXE is untagged by default, hence why you can't provision on a VLAN.
[23:52] <g3> I don't think a VLAN is currently needed as I am using an entirely seperate network for this?
[23:52] <andrew-ii> Right
[23:52] <g3> Can MAAS handle IPMI stuff?
[23:52] <andrew-ii> At least, I think it's recommended to let maas be on its own hardware; that's what I'm trying
[23:53] <g3> LIke have MAAS provide DHCP and then use those IP's for IPMI management stuff?
[23:53] <andrew-ii> Generally I think the IPMI stuff is pretty good
[23:53] <andrew-ii> I have an HP iLo2 Gen 5 server off Craigslist that apparently has a firmware bug that just refuses to play ball with it, but otherwise every other machine seemed to connect well
[23:54] <g3> Oh and I see that it will handle APC pdu things interesting.
[23:54] <andrew-ii> I set static IPs for the IPMI connections, but I think the node discovery may actually figure it out for you; I haven't tried that yet
[23:55] <g3> Yeah it looks like post-commission you can have it set up all of the network interfaces.
[23:56] <g3> Do you know the difference between commission, acquire and deploy?
[23:57] <andrew-ii> Commission: bootstrap the machine and get it to report back settings; Acquire: plonk your name on it and reserve the node (I think); Deploy: Spin up the node with an image (full install)
[23:58] <andrew-ii> Someone probably has a better answer about what Aquire does