=== czchen is now known as czchen_ === czchen_ is now known as czchen === giraffe is now known as Guest52692 === JanC is now known as Guest69133 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [02:07] Any chance I can get some help kicking imagemagick through zesty-proposed? [02:08] I'll do some more local testing, but it would help to get it through for Alpha 2. [02:08] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt - it shows it breaks things [02:08] Like I said, I'll play with it locally, but if someone has a solution, please ping. [02:09] bug 1550210 is in our release notes [02:09] bug 1550210 in imagemagick (Ubuntu) "Desktop file does not open ImageMagick from the menu" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1550210 [03:08] tsimonq2: You should better focus your efforts on this one then though: https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-1 [03:10] krytarik: I'll file a bug tomorrow [03:10] krytarik: Thanks, nice catch. [03:11] So, fairly close to a workaround for the APT issue. [03:11] juliank: \o/ \o/ \o/ [03:11] It turns out that the whole thing is caused by (a) by-hash producing the same URI for empty icons-128x128 and icons-64x64 and (b) apt merging targets with the same URI [03:12] The targets then ended up in some kind of different state, and the whole thing went a bit strange. [03:12] Fun. [03:12] So what I just tried out is only merging files for the same destination. [03:13] That fixes the issue, but breaks a minor part in the test suite testing the merging targets works. [03:14] I'll go to sleep now and hope DonKult has a better idea in the next hours... (it's 4 am now!) [03:14] Thanks juliank :) === giraffe is now known as Guest5935 [08:48] hi, anybody ever hit "../sysdeps/nptl/fork.c:156: __libc_fork: Assertion `THREAD_GETMEM (self, tid) != ppid' failed." on our platforms that do container based testing? [08:49] I ran into that driving a nova test for a proposed qemu update, but from my search I'm almost convinced it is unrelated to the actual thing that you test [08:49] This is how it looks for me https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty-ci-train-ppa-service-2379/zesty/s390x/n/nova/20170124_144900_ec0dd@/log.gz [08:50] all efforts on it so far seem to have stalled to a halt https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9225661/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/6/470 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15392 [08:50] sourceware.org bug 15392 in nptl "Linux, setns, PID namespaces, fork: assert() about pid inequality hit sporadically" [Minor,New] [08:51] Since it seems to be something that might just "randomly happen" I wanted to ask if anybody else has seen that? [08:52] for now I'm rerunning it to check if it is really random for me as well [10:54] Whoa, snapcraft tests take a long time. [11:03] Laney, tsimonq2: OK. I got a complete workaround (the right fix?) for the icon tarball hashsum mismatch issue. I can upload that now. I wonder if that affects anyone else than kubuntu, though, and I don't know if the other workaround (do not fetch 128x128 icons) is already enabled. [11:04] juliank: plasma-discover is the package that enables both - I don't see an upload changing that === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson_ === marcustomlinson_ is now known as marcustomlinson [11:12] Laney: OK, I cherry-picked that from its branch and the fix for partial requests on sourceforge from master and uploaded it :) [11:12] the partial request thing was #1657567 [11:12] bug 1657567 [11:12] bug 1657567 in apt (Ubuntu) ""Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657567 [11:13] juliank: many thanks ;-) [11:13] we can kick a new kubuntu build once apt goes in === _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem === _salem is now known as salem_ === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko === salem_ is now known as _salem [13:40] cjwatson: re this ISO boot issue (screenshot in the bug report) - is this some sort of isolinux theming issue - if so, any ideas how we can resolve this for Ubuntu Budgie? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1659278 [13:40] Launchpad bug 1659278 in syslinux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Budgie does not boot directly to ubiquity try/install screen" [Undecided,New] [13:41] IIRC there's some horrible thing buried in debian-cd or something [13:43] fossfreedom_: yeah, see lp:~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu tools/boot/zesty/boot-*, look for HIDDEN_TIMEOUT in particular [13:44] the semantics are a bit of a mess but are explained in the gfxboot-theme-ubuntu changelog, items for 0.9.3 and 0.9.9 [13:44] (sorry ...) [13:50] cjwatson: oh... that is making my head spin trying to understand that. [13:51] cyphermox: are you aware of the network-manager and network-manager-applet SRUs in Xenial? [13:51] Just wondered if you were still involved and/or had an opinion. [13:53] fossfreedom_: it is unpleasant, sorry - but I think the above is probably enough information to fix the bug [14:12] cjwatson: k - thanks. think I understand this. How can I test a proposed merge request? [14:12] fossfreedom_: la la la [14:12] fossfreedom_: best is probably to remaster an image with hidden-timeout=2 or whatever hacked into the relevant config file, but you'll need to figure out where ... [14:13] jamespage: coreycb: I've hit THREAD_GETMEM in the nova dep8 Test triggered by the install of ca-certificates [14:13] jamespage: coreycb: I've asked about that about 5.5h before now in the chan, but nobody else responded to have seen it [14:14] jamespage: coreycb: since it shows up "again" on s390 on my retest I wonder how common that might be - have you seen those issues? [14:14] cpaelzer, I'll defer to coreycb and zul for that answer [14:14] cpaelzer, i've never seen it unfortunately [14:16] coreycb: this was my former question with a bit more details https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/01/25/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t08:48 [14:16] coreycb: really never - weird [14:16] cpaelzer:i dont remember seeing that either [14:17] thanks zul and coreycb [14:18] I'm just puzzled on how random it might be as I hit it on ppc&s390 at first and s390 only on the retry [14:18] xnox, have you come across this at all on s390? ^ [14:18] cpaelzer, it sounds like it's container related then [14:18] seems to be able to happen on any of the autppkgtest environments that use containers [14:18] yes that is what I found from my debugging this morning [14:19] or even "pid namespace" related to be even more specific [14:19] Mirv, hi! Do you have any plans to update qtcreator? It currently blocks qbs migration because it was built against old version, and with new qbs it FTBFS (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2401/+packages). [14:19] cpaelzer, yeah i'm surprised i haven't seen it before [14:21] for now I'll rerun it again to see how transient it is, but the 3/4 I've seen so far do not appear as "almost never" to me === _salem is now known as salem_ [14:32] cpaelzer, possibly related: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/linux.kernel/G7aBRlEGHqw/tXT9cJV_AwAJ [14:33] cpaelzer, https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15392 [14:33] sourceware.org bug 15392 in nptl "Linux, setns, PID namespaces, fork: assert() about pid inequality hit sporadically" [Minor,New] [14:33] cpaelzer, https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/6/470 [14:37] rbasak: sorry, I can look but I don't know off the top of my head [14:42] coreycb: yeah that is the bug I linked this morning [14:49] cpaelzer, oh, sorry :) [14:50] coreycb: no reason to excuse [14:50] coreycb: I just hope you didn't spend too much time to re-find that [15:23] mitya57: hi. not special plans, feel free to update though as the delta is smallish these days and easy to keep. [15:31] Mirv, OK, will try to update it. [15:34] xnox: please can you explain _why_ you make changes in your changelog entries? Take bug 1657909 for example, which is in limbo because we don't know why you made a change. [15:34] bug 1657909 in gnome-keyring (Ubuntu Yakkety) "SSH service should be hidden from Startup Applications too" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657909 [15:34] xnox: also if you could explain in the bug, that would be useful. [15:46] andyrock: Hi - seb128 signed you up on this bug report affecting Ubuntu Budgie!! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1631745 ... any chance you can have a quick glance over my proposed patch to gnome-menus please? [15:46] Launchpad bug 1631745 in gnome-menus (Ubuntu) "hostname-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()" [High,In progress] [15:48] mmm the fix is not a real fix [15:49] we need a proper bt or valagrind log to solve it [15:54] k - my intention is not to affect any other desktop like Unity - just needed to get budgie-desktop to run through the original code because the problem does not occur with that codebase [15:54] valagrind doesnt help here - it doesnt crash - I guess its a race condition of somesort and the slow running through valgrind doesnt exercise the issue. [16:17] gnome-panel does not crash [16:19] it can be that the problem is in budgie-desktop main menu code [16:19] fossfreedom_ i'm ok with that patch [16:20] but I'm wondering why you can't just distro patch directly in budgie-desktop [16:20] andyrock: yeah - discussed with upstream - they couldn't reproduce this so would not deal with the issue (understandably) [16:22] budgie-desktop is vala based. I don't have any vala knowledge myself so can't patch it. I only know C and python :/ [16:23] oki [16:23] seb128 is not online [16:23] we need to talk with him [16:30] Laney: I just received the email that apt was accepted :) [16:31] Exciting times! [16:31] juliank: nice to know we have solid tests :P [16:32] when rmadison agrees, we can fire the rebuild [17:13] cpaelzer: around? [17:23] fossfreedom: I think if you know C and Python then modifying existing Vala code should be pretty straightforward (maybe harder if you have to write significant new code) [17:24] to simplify, it's basically C with Javaish syntax layered over the top and approximately Python-like library bindings [19:06] doko, a fix for python-glanceclient is in the trusty review queue. bug 1404227 [19:07] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1404227 [19:07] cjwatson: Myself and upstream have looked at the budgie-code, there doesnt seem to be anything wrong in the way it is coded - proper locking to stop reentrant type issues etc. The menu code really does assume gnome-menus does all the heavy lifting - it only uses the output. So given where this issue is I dont see a way to intercept/integrate any code without rewriting masses of gnome-menu code :/ [19:07] bug 1404227 in python-glanceclient (Ubuntu) "Unit test failures due to changes in python 2.7.9" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1404227 === salem_ is now known as _salem === _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem [22:01] Anyone know why I'm getting this? [22:02] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads [22:02] This is on a silo [22:02] .. trying to build qtmir [22:02] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/303893883/buildlog_ubuntu-zesty-amd64.qtmir_0.5.1+17.04.20170125.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz [22:05] camako: that should be -lpthread surely [22:05] camako: without the s [22:06] mwhudson, oh I wonder why it's with 's' [22:06] mwhudson, I am blind... thanks for spotting it [22:07] camako: np :) [22:39] juliank: These apt autopkgtest failures for the SRU are false positives right? [22:40] bdmurray: ack [23:59] Hi folks, greetings! I found a weird "bug" on libgtk/gtk2-engines-pixbuf, I manage to fix in my system, but worth the report I guess