tsimonq2slangasek: Ping ping ping :)00:34
tsimonq2slangasek: We have Alpha 2 images?00:34
tsimonq2slangasek: If not, could you Please Make It Happen ASAP? I'm getting poked by people, I got on here late because of a headache...00:38
slangasektsimonq2: uh, I don't think that should be a question to me, the flavor teams should be triggering builds of their own images from iso.qa.ubuntu.com?  but let me make sure the milestone is on the tracker00:38
tsimonq2slangasek: Archive block? :))00:39
tsimonq2slangasek: Don't we do that for milestones? :))))00:39
wxlmaybe extend the release date given the confusion00:39
slangasektsimonq2: well. we do, but that's not a prereq for building candidate images.00:39
tsimonq2slangasek: Ok, so how can Mr. wxl help with that? He has access...00:40
wxlafaik he has to get the milestone on there before i can do anything but maybe i'm worng00:40
tsimonq2wxl: Who does?00:41
wxltsimonq2: release team00:42
slangasekzesty alpha 2 milestone created00:42
slangasektsimonq2: what's the list of flavors participating in alpha2?00:42
tsimonq2slangasek: Ubuntu Budgie, Kubuntu, Lubuntu00:43
tsimonq2I know that for sure00:43
tsimonq2Looking on the ML to see if anyone else is in...00:44
wxldef. not Xubuntu00:44
wxlprobably Kylin00:44
wxlyou should check in with them00:44
tsimonq2^ that was my thought yeah00:44
wxli haven't heard from Gnome folks in a while00:44
tsimonq2slangasek: And Ubuntu GNOME00:44
tsimonq2wxl: See the ML00:45
wxlor, come to think of it, MATE!00:45
wxlcan we push out the release until LATE thursday or early friday?00:45
tsimonq2Whatever slangasek is comfortable with.00:45
tsimonq2flexiondotorg: You in for Alpha 2?00:46
tsimonq2Oh I wish I didn't have this headache so I could have caught him a few hours ago /o\00:46
wxlwell i'm feeling kind of ill for what it's worth00:46
wxlmom in law's going in for surgery tomorrow too :(00:46
tsimonq2It's going around00:46
tsimonq2wxl: Eek, good luck to her00:47
wxlone of the bafoons at work was coughing all over the place yesterday00:47
tsimonq2slangasek: So I think our list is: Ubuntu Budgie, Kubuntu, Lubuntu, and Ubuntu GNOME, waiting to hear from Ubuntu MATE00:47
tsimonq2slangasek: We can add more flavors if necessary tomorrow?00:47
slangasektsimonq2: ok, have triggered builds, hopefully those land in the correct milestone00:48
tsimonq2slangasek: \o/00:48
tsimonq2slangasek: Thank you. :)00:49
tsimonq2slangasek: So...why is this empty, just curious?01:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added01:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added02:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added02:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added02:25
slangasektsimonq2: ^^ because builds take time.  not empty anymore.02:41
slangasekthough the kubuntu builds failed and I'm retrying that now02:42
tsimonq2slangasek: No need to retry02:42
tsimonq2slangasek: Known bug02:42
tsimonq2slangasek: And yes, sorry for my impatience. :)02:43
tsimonq2(didn't know that builds are what populated it...)02:43
slangasekis it? the build log complained about hash mismatches on apt sources02:43
* tsimonq2 finds Debian bug02:43
slangasekok, well, then it'll fail the same way again02:43
tsimonq2slangasek: http://bugs.debian.org/83844102:44
ubot5Debian bug 838441 in apt "apt-get update fails with "Hash Sum mismatch", mixes hashes between tar.gz and tar file" [Normal,Open]02:44
slangasekwhy is that only affecting kubuntu?02:44
tsimonq2slangasek: I pinged juliank and he gave me a temporary workaround, so we're good for now.02:44
tsimonq2Because look at his work around... (finding logs)02:44
tsimonq207:40:05 PM <juliank> I assume the kubuntu meta package enables the hidpi icons for appstream, I'd disable them for now, this should  work around the issue  for unknown reasons02:45
slangasekah ok02:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdrm [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.70-1~ubuntu16.04.1]02:47
slangasekwell, once that's sorted I guess you'll still need an initial kubuntu alpha2 build triggered from nusakan02:47
tsimonq2slangasek: Also, while you're around, wine made apt start whining and it won't shut up, confirmed:02:49
tsimonq2W: Ignoring Provides line with non-equal DepCompareOp for package wine02:49
tsimonq2(user in #ubuntu+1 confirmed this morning)02:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added02:53
tsimonq2flocculant: Uh what? -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added02:56
tsimonq2slangasek: Nevermind I think03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-tagging [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.5-1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added05:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added05:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]06:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.0.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]06:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.128ubuntu5.1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added07:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-tagging [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1:0.4.5-1]07:15
flocculantcan someone from the release team get Xubuntu removed from this alpha 2 thing please :)07:29
flocculantnot quite sure how one arch got added :)07:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added08:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added08:35
ginggstsimonq2: c.paelzer reported the wine issue in -devel, j.uliank had a look. it was a bad merge, should already be fixed in 1.8.6-3ubuntu208:53
cpaelzercool I get a highlight even with a . in my name - how did that work :-)08:58
flexiondotorgtsimonq2 We'd like to be, not sure if we've left it too late?09:02
flexiondotorgAha, I see images :-)09:02
cpaelzertsimonq2: FYI since I was waiting for it as well I happen to know that the fixed wine binary was pubished 2017-01-24 17:38:49 UTC09:03
cpaelzertsimonq2: well you could check that on publication history as well, but I had that still open this morning09:03
=== rvba` is now known as rvba
fossfreedom_Hi all - for Ubuntu Budgie we cannot see any tests for Alpha 2 in the ISO tracker (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/371/builds) - please can someone have a look at this please?10:16
tseliotsil2100: hey, apparently my ubuntu-core-dev membership has expired. Can you add me back, please?10:48
tseliotmy username is albertomilone10:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added10:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added10:49
Laneyfossfreedom_: there10:50
tseliotinfinity: or if you can do it too, please? ^^10:55
* tseliot is changes the procmail filters that made him miss the notifications10:56
sil2100tseliot: uh oh!10:56
sil2100tseliot: let me look into that :)10:57
tseliotsil2100: thanks!10:57
fossfreedom_Laney: many thanks!10:58
sil2100tseliot: ok, you should be renewed now11:01
tseliotsil2100: thanks a lot! :)11:03
sil2100tseliot: yw!11:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 (zesty-proposed/primary) [375.26-0ubuntu1]11:07
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson_
=== marcustomlinson_ is now known as marcustomlinson
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: humanity-icon-theme (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.10 =>] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)11:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-dsv [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-5] (no packageset)11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected uvtool [sync] (trusty-proposed) [0~bzr92-0ubuntu2]11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected landscape-client [source] (trusty-proposed) [14.12-0ubuntu1.14.04]11:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-dsv [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-5]11:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: humanity-icon-theme (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.6.11 =>] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)11:34
Laneysil2100: if you've got a minute, would appreciate review of those humanity-icon-theme SRUs11:35
Laneythey want to try to get them into .2 - don't know how likely that is, but -proposed is the first step anyway11:35
Laneydebdiff doesn't work very well on them I'm afraid (bzr diff is more reasonable)11:36
sil2100Laney: hey! Let me take a look then11:38
sil2100heh, yeah, seeing a 15MiB diff on the queue doesn't seem like review-friendly ;D11:40
rbasakI have a working branch of the git importer that lets us review from the unapproved queue in git, with reference to the same source package in the rest of the archive (so you can diff against arbitrary versions, etc)11:41
apwrbasak, interesting11:54
rbasakapw: for example, I'm reviewing pyqt5 right now. Here's my view of it: https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/pyqt512:00
rbasakand https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/pyqt5/log/?id=queue/trusty/unapproved/5b7b0a312:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted humanity-icon-theme [source] (xenial-proposed) []12:05
Dmitrii-Shhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1656480 is now in the upload queue. If anybody from the SRU team has time, please take a look. The verification steps are provided in the bug but I can give an even more detailed description if needed.12:07
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1656480 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "QEMU Does not Send L2 Broadcasts After Live Migration" [High,In progress]12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted humanity-icon-theme [source] (yakkety-proposed) []12:10
sil2100Laney: both approved12:10
Laneysil2100: you're my hero12:10
Laneyor System 76's hero maybe12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (yakkety-proposed/partner) [128.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.10] (no packageset)12:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [111.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset)12:20
flocculantthanks whoever moved xubuntu out of a2 - did updating iso get switched back on for it?12:23
LaneyDoesn't look like any entries are disabled yet12:26
LaneyI guess I could do that12:26
flocculantLaney: not sure what the state of those are - not even sure how half of xubuntu could get on the a2 bit :)12:27
flocculantty anyway :)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.8]12:28
apwDmitrii-Sh, ^ ... if you want to test that when it finshes building that'd be good12:28
Laneyflocculant: presumably because there's no i386 in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/pending/12:29
flocculantLaney: 32bit built when it was supposed to last night - and exists on the daily tracker - 64bit didn't build last night and ended up on a2 *shrug*12:33
tsimonq2slangasek: Please build Ubuntu Kylin images and Ubuntu MATE images, they're in.12:33
flocculantanyway - just wanted to make sure our dailies where still set to build overnight12:33
Laneyflocculant: sure looks like i386 is behind to me12:34
tsimonq2Laney: He's sleeping, any chance you could just add those quick? ^12:34
Laneytsimonq2: they are there already12:34
tsimonq2Oh really? Cool.12:34
flocculantLaney: yea - sorry - lunch time not concentrating12:35
Laneydon't ask me why though12:35
tsimonq2slangasek: nvm12:36
flocculantLaney: ok thanks - don't ask me why either :p12:36
Dmitrii-Shapw: I can check. Did that for yakkety as the fix came there from the qemu upstream12:42
tsimonq2flexiondotorg: Not too late, you're in. :)12:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [source] (trusty-proposed) [5.2.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2]13:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icingaweb2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.0-1ubuntu1.2]13:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdns-recursor [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.0.0~alpha2-2ubuntu0.1]13:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxwidgets3.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.0.2+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.1]13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gss-ntlmssp [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.04.1]14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gss-ntlmssp [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.10.1]14:27
barrysil2100: did you get a chance to review u-i sru?  anything i can do to help?14:43
cpaelzerrobru: on bileto I wonder how I can force a "re-test" of autopkgtest14:47
cpaelzerrobru: hitting the usual restart icon (the one that looks like a recycling circle of arrows) gives me only "login via sso" and clicking that does nothing14:48
cpaelzerrobru: I tried setting the Lander Sign-off to "" and then back to "approved" which gets it to the state queued14:48
cpaelzerrobru: but I realized that it finds it is done already and goes to the old results14:49
cpaelzerwhat is the way to re-kick all Tests for a ticket in bileto?14:49
cpaelzeruploading a new version being the obvious choice, but if there is something simpler I'd like to know14:50
=== ant_ is now known as ant__
slangasektjaalton: gss-ntlmssp> you know about debhelper's support for .maintscript?  saves you repeating dpkg-maintscript snippets in multiple places15:33
tjaaltonslangasek: i've probably heard about it in the past but haven't used it..15:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ironic [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu1]15:44
sil2100barry: hey! I checked it briefly, but I think we still need to wait the 7-day grace period for SRUs, no?15:48
barrysil2100: oh, maybe so15:49
sil2100Asking since maybe u-i has some exception or something, since I'm new to the SRU team15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: galileo (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1 => 0.5.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected galileo [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0-1ubuntu1]16:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted galileo [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0-1ubuntu1]16:04
maprerirbasak: re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/galileo/+bug/1650046/comments/15 - yes, I work on Debian, and indeed I noticed it doesn't add Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed in the .changes, but didn't care till now since lauchpad seems to close bugs nonetheless.16:07
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1650046 in galileo (Ubuntu Yakkety) "application doesn't sync, it needs to be updated." [Medium,Fix committed]16:07
mapreriDo you mean that some other tool that you use to process SRUs rely on that field?  If so I guess I can just use -D"Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed=12345 6790" while building the source for SRUs16:09
slangasekmapreri: yes, the sru processing tools all look at the set of bugs in .changes to track what bugs need sru verification16:14
mapreriI wonder if I do something else to have dpkg behaves ubuntuish while doing ubuntu stuff.  maybe exporting DEB_VENDOR=ubuntu is enough for this.16:15
mapreri…if I *can* do something…16:15
slangasekmapreri: dpkg's behavior is sensitive to DEBEMAIL=.*ubuntu16:16
Laneythat works, but you might have to make /etc/dpkg/origins/ubuntu exist first16:16
maprerislangasek: o.O  that sounds so much like a layer violation16:17
slangaseknone of the layers in between are interesting16:17
mapreriThat said, I already export DEBEMAIL=*@debian.org so it'd still be something to change when I do ubuntu-only work.16:17
mapreriLaney: point, thanks16:17
slangasekLaney's trick might also work, I've never tried16:18
LaneyI think it's the vendor rather than the email16:18
rbasakmapreri: yeah, what slangasek said. When I ran "sru-review" (the first step), the first thing it said was "NO BUGS!!1!". But if I ignored that and went ahead, I think the pending-sru report may be wrong as well (though haven't checked)16:18
slangasekrbasak: yes, it would be16:18
LaneyThe email thing is IIRC for screaming at you if you don't fix the maintainer16:18
slangasekrbasak: it's fair game (but not required) to reject, download, reupload w/ correct dpkg options, and accept, in such cases16:19
maprerirbasak: I've did several SRU, and all of them the same way, it's the first time somebody bring this topic up.16:19
rbasakslangasek: indeed, and I did :-)16:19
slangasekok :)16:19
mapreriThanks for it, I'll improve/fixup my setup/workflow :)16:19
rbasakmapreri: no problem. Thank you for caring :-)16:20
acheronukcan a source be removed from zesty if it's still in debian unstable? and if so, if there any protection from someone trying to be helpful and re-syncing it?16:22
mapreriAFAIK yes on both, but nothing can stop somebody from manually uploading it.16:22
acheronukmapreri: well, very unlikely anyone would want to do that with the old defunct KDE4 stuff I'm thinking of. so that seems to be ok16:24
mapreriacheronuk: well, if it's dead stuff, why not just get it RMed from debian?  (ubuntu will follow after some time, when a random Archive Admin gets more free time than usual to sync up on the removals)16:26
acheronukmapreri: we are for once ahead of debian slightly on KDE applications, so they may still have some deps on some of it that we don't (or won't). may be able to do that with some though16:31
mapreriTBH, in the past I noticed a lot of K* packages that were several upstream version ahead in Ubuntu than in Debian, and I couldn't get it at all…16:31
* mapreri is very biased, being both ubuntu and debian developer, and having "push ubuntu deltas into Debian" as one point of his MOTU application :)16:32
robrucpaelzer: only core dev can restart autopkgtests within the same package version16:39
acheronukmapreri: yeah, 'for once' may have been a bad choice of words. 'once again' may be more accurate. but I've not been doing this that long, so my comparative memory is short16:41
mapreriacheronuk: doesn't actually really surprise this time, given that debian is freezing, though.16:43
acheronukthat is certainly part of it16:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ngraph-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [6.07.02-2]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)17:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-nebulouslabs-merkletree [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160203.0.f01b2e9-1] (no packageset)17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtrkcad [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:4.2.4a-1] (no packageset)17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-huin-goupnp [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20161025.0.97f671e-1] (no packageset)17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170125.3)18:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170125.3)18:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glanceclient (trusty-proposed/main) [1:0.12.0-0ubuntu1.1 => 1:0.12.0-0ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)19:06
cpaelzerthanks robru19:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appmenu-qt5 (xenial-proposed/main) [0.3.0+16.04.20151130-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.0+16.04.20151130-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages)20:20
lamontoh hai.  I'm hoping to upload a package to zesty to address bug 1645912 sometime today/tomorrow morning.  Can I get feedback on that SRU info ahead of time, so that we can get the screaming, cursing, and crying done beforehand?21:19
ubot5bug 1645912 in freeipmi (Ubuntu) "freeipmi ipmi-config --checkout lacks support for ipv6 lan parameters" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164591221:19
clivejoanyone on the release team who could please review and accept the new KDE packages in the queue?21:43
flocculantfossfreedom: just for your information - I've been checking various flavours/greeters - you are affected by bug 165639921:46
ubot5bug 1656399 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "Unable to unlock Xubuntu XFCE session after suspend." [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165639921:46
camakoDoes anyone know why I"m getting this error?22:03
camako/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads22:03
camakothis is ticket #236922:04
camakotrying to build qtmir22:04
cjwatsoncamako: it's normally -lpthread not -lpthreads ...22:15
cjwatsoncamako: probably a typo in your package22:15
camakocjwatson, thanks... I realized this wasn't the problem.22:16
cjwatson(don't see it in the qtmir diff, but maybe in a dependency)22:16
fossfreedomflocculant: yes - similarly affected (although you confirmed before I started looking!).  Thanks.  subscribing.23:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.18.0-1ubuntu0.1]23:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.19.0-1ubuntu0.1]23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!