[00:34] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ping ping ping :)
[00:34] <tsimonq2> slangasek: We have Alpha 2 images?
[00:38] <tsimonq2> slangasek: If not, could you Please Make It Happen ASAP? I'm getting poked by people, I got on here late because of a headache...
[00:38] <slangasek> tsimonq2: uh, I don't think that should be a question to me, the flavor teams should be triggering builds of their own images from iso.qa.ubuntu.com?  but let me make sure the milestone is on the tracker
[00:39] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Archive block? :))
[00:39] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Don't we do that for milestones? :))))
[00:39] <wxl> maybe extend the release date given the confusion
[00:39] <slangasek> tsimonq2: well. we do, but that's not a prereq for building candidate images.
[00:40] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok, so how can Mr. wxl help with that? He has access...
[00:40] <wxl> afaik he has to get the milestone on there before i can do anything but maybe i'm worng
[00:41] <tsimonq2> wxl: Who does?
[00:42] <wxl> tsimonq2: release team
[00:42] <slangasek> zesty alpha 2 milestone created
[00:42] <slangasek> tsimonq2: what's the list of flavors participating in alpha2?
[00:43] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ubuntu Budgie, Kubuntu, Lubuntu
[00:43] <tsimonq2> I know that for sure
[00:44] <tsimonq2> Looking on the ML to see if anyone else is in...
[00:44] <wxl> def. not Xubuntu
[00:44] <wxl> probably Kylin
[00:44] <wxl> you should check in with them
[00:44] <tsimonq2> ^ that was my thought yeah
[00:44] <wxl> i haven't heard from Gnome folks in a while
[00:44] <tsimonq2> slangasek: And Ubuntu GNOME
[00:45] <tsimonq2> wxl: See the ML
[00:45] <wxl> or, come to think of it, MATE!
[00:45] <wxl> can we push out the release until LATE thursday or early friday?
[00:45] <tsimonq2> Whatever slangasek is comfortable with.
[00:46] <tsimonq2> flexiondotorg: You in for Alpha 2?
[00:46] <tsimonq2> Oh I wish I didn't have this headache so I could have caught him a few hours ago /o\
[00:46] <wxl> well i'm feeling kind of ill for what it's worth
[00:46] <wxl> mom in law's going in for surgery tomorrow too :(
[00:46] <tsimonq2> It's going around
[00:47] <tsimonq2> wxl: Eek, good luck to her
[00:47] <wxl> one of the bafoons at work was coughing all over the place yesterday
[00:47] <tsimonq2> slangasek: So I think our list is: Ubuntu Budgie, Kubuntu, Lubuntu, and Ubuntu GNOME, waiting to hear from Ubuntu MATE
[00:47] <tsimonq2> slangasek: We can add more flavors if necessary tomorrow?
[00:48] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ok, have triggered builds, hopefully those land in the correct milestone
[00:48] <tsimonq2> slangasek: \o/
[00:49] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Thank you. :)
[01:13] <tsimonq2> slangasek: So...why is this empty, just curious?
[01:13] <tsimonq2> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/371/builds
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[02:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[02:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[02:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[02:41] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ^^ because builds take time.  not empty anymore.
[02:42] <slangasek> though the kubuntu builds failed and I'm retrying that now
[02:42] <tsimonq2> slangasek: No need to retry
[02:42] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Known bug
[02:43] <tsimonq2> slangasek: And yes, sorry for my impatience. :)
[02:43] <tsimonq2> (didn't know that builds are what populated it...)
[02:43] <slangasek> is it? the build log complained about hash mismatches on apt sources
[02:43] <tsimonq2> Yep.
[02:43]  * tsimonq2 finds Debian bug
[02:43] <slangasek> ok, well, then it'll fail the same way again
[02:44] <tsimonq2> slangasek: http://bugs.debian.org/838441
[02:44] <slangasek> why is that only affecting kubuntu?
[02:44] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I pinged juliank and he gave me a temporary workaround, so we're good for now.
[02:44] <tsimonq2> Because look at his work around... (finding logs)
[02:45] <tsimonq2> 07:40:05 PM <juliank> I assume the kubuntu meta package enables the hidpi icons for appstream, I'd disable them for now, this should  work around the issue  for unknown reasons
[02:45] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[02:47] <slangasek> ah ok
[02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdrm [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.70-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[02:47] <slangasek> well, once that's sorted I guess you'll still need an initial kubuntu alpha2 build triggered from nusakan
[02:48] <tsimonq2> Ok
[02:49] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Also, while you're around, wine made apt start whining and it won't shut up, confirmed:
[02:49] <tsimonq2> W: Ignoring Provides line with non-equal DepCompareOp for package wine
[02:49] <tsimonq2> (user in #ubuntu+1 confirmed this morning)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[02:56] <tsimonq2> flocculant: Uh what? -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[03:05] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Nevermind I think
[04:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-django-tagging [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:0.4.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.0.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.128ubuntu5.1]
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-django-tagging [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1:0.4.5-1]
[07:29] <flocculant> can someone from the release team get Xubuntu removed from this alpha 2 thing please :)
[07:29] <flocculant> tia
[07:34] <flocculant> not quite sure how one arch got added :)
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[08:53] <ginggs> tsimonq2: c.paelzer reported the wine issue in -devel, j.uliank had a look. it was a bad merge, should already be fixed in 1.8.6-3ubuntu2
[08:58] <cpaelzer> cool I get a highlight even with a . in my name - how did that work :-)
[09:02] <flexiondotorg> tsimonq2 We'd like to be, not sure if we've left it too late?
[09:02] <flexiondotorg> Aha, I see images :-)
[09:03] <cpaelzer> tsimonq2: FYI since I was waiting for it as well I happen to know that the fixed wine binary was pubished 2017-01-24 17:38:49 UTC
[09:03] <cpaelzer> tsimonq2: well you could check that on publication history as well, but I had that still open this morning
[10:16] <fossfreedom_> Hi all - for Ubuntu Budgie we cannot see any tests for Alpha 2 in the ISO tracker (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/371/builds) - please can someone have a look at this please?
[10:48] <tseliot> sil2100: hey, apparently my ubuntu-core-dev membership has expired. Can you add me back, please?
[10:49] <tseliot> my username is albertomilone
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[10:50] <Laney> fossfreedom_: there
[10:55] <tseliot> infinity: or if you can do it too, please? ^^
[10:56]  * tseliot is changes the procmail filters that made him miss the notifications
[10:56] <tseliot> s/is//
[10:56] <sil2100> tseliot: uh oh!
[10:57] <sil2100> tseliot: let me look into that :)
[10:57] <tseliot> sil2100: thanks!
[10:58] <fossfreedom_> Laney: many thanks!
[11:01] <sil2100> tseliot: ok, you should be renewed now
[11:03] <tseliot> sil2100: thanks a lot! :)
[11:04] <sil2100> tseliot: yw!
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 (zesty-proposed/primary) [375.26-0ubuntu1]
[11:10] <marcusto_> marcustomlinson
[11:10] <marcustomlinson_> oops
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: humanity-icon-theme (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.10 => 0.6.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-dsv [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-5] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected uvtool [sync] (trusty-proposed) [0~bzr92-0ubuntu2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected landscape-client [source] (trusty-proposed) [14.12-0ubuntu1.14.04]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-dsv [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-5]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: humanity-icon-theme (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.6.11 => 0.6.11.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:35] <Laney> sil2100: if you've got a minute, would appreciate review of those humanity-icon-theme SRUs
[11:35] <Laney> they want to try to get them into .2 - don't know how likely that is, but -proposed is the first step anyway
[11:36] <Laney> debdiff doesn't work very well on them I'm afraid (bzr diff is more reasonable)
[11:38] <sil2100> Laney: hey! Let me take a look then
[11:38] <Laney> thanks!
[11:40] <sil2100> heh, yeah, seeing a 15MiB diff on the queue doesn't seem like review-friendly ;D
[11:41] <rbasak> I have a working branch of the git importer that lets us review from the unapproved queue in git, with reference to the same source package in the rest of the archive (so you can diff against arbitrary versions, etc)
[11:54] <apw> rbasak, interesting
[12:00] <rbasak> apw: for example, I'm reviewing pyqt5 right now. Here's my view of it: https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/pyqt5
[12:01] <rbasak> and https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/pyqt5/log/?id=queue/trusty/unapproved/5b7b0a3
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted humanity-icon-theme [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.10.1]
[12:07] <Dmitrii-Sh> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1656480 is now in the upload queue. If anybody from the SRU team has time, please take a look. The verification steps are provided in the bug but I can give an even more detailed description if needed.
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted humanity-icon-theme [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.11.1]
[12:10] <sil2100> Laney: both approved
[12:10] <Laney> sil2100: you're my hero
[12:10] <Laney> or System 76's hero maybe
[12:13] <sil2100> ;p
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (yakkety-proposed/partner) [128.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.10] (no packageset)
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [111.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:23] <flocculant> thanks whoever moved xubuntu out of a2 - did updating iso get switched back on for it?
[12:26] <Laney> Doesn't look like any entries are disabled yet
[12:26] <Laney> I guess I could do that
[12:27] <flocculant> Laney: not sure what the state of those are - not even sure how half of xubuntu could get on the a2 bit :)
[12:27] <flocculant> ty anyway :)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.8]
[12:28] <apw> Dmitrii-Sh, ^ ... if you want to test that when it finshes building that'd be good
[12:29] <Laney> flocculant: presumably because there's no i386 in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/pending/
[12:33] <flocculant> Laney: 32bit built when it was supposed to last night - and exists on the daily tracker - 64bit didn't build last night and ended up on a2 *shrug*
[12:33] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Please build Ubuntu Kylin images and Ubuntu MATE images, they're in.
[12:33] <flocculant> anyway - just wanted to make sure our dailies where still set to build overnight
[12:34] <Laney> flocculant: sure looks like i386 is behind to me
[12:34] <tsimonq2> Laney: He's sleeping, any chance you could just add those quick? ^
[12:34] <Laney> tsimonq2: they are there already
[12:34] <tsimonq2> Oh really? Cool.
[12:35] <flocculant> Laney: yea - sorry - lunch time not concentrating
[12:35] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/xubuntu/zesty/daily-live-20170125.log
[12:35] <Laney> don't ask me why though
[12:36] <tsimonq2> slangasek: nvm
[12:36] <flocculant> Laney: ok thanks - don't ask me why either :p
[12:42] <Dmitrii-Sh> apw: I can check. Did that for yakkety as the fix came there from the qemu upstream
[12:43] <tsimonq2> flexiondotorg: Not too late, you're in. :)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [source] (trusty-proposed) [5.2.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icingaweb2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.0-1ubuntu1.2]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdns-recursor [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.0.0~alpha2-2ubuntu0.1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxwidgets3.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.0.2+dfsg-1.3ubuntu0.1]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gss-ntlmssp [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gss-ntlmssp [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.0-3~ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[14:43] <barry> sil2100: did you get a chance to review u-i sru?  anything i can do to help?
[14:47] <cpaelzer> robru: on bileto I wonder how I can force a "re-test" of autopkgtest
[14:48] <cpaelzer> robru: hitting the usual restart icon (the one that looks like a recycling circle of arrows) gives me only "login via sso" and clicking that does nothing
[14:48] <cpaelzer> robru: I tried setting the Lander Sign-off to "" and then back to "approved" which gets it to the state queued
[14:49] <cpaelzer> robru: but I realized that it finds it is done already and goes to the old results
[14:49] <cpaelzer> what is the way to re-kick all Tests for a ticket in bileto?
[14:50] <cpaelzer> uploading a new version being the obvious choice, but if there is something simpler I'd like to know
[15:33] <slangasek> tjaalton: gss-ntlmssp> you know about debhelper's support for .maintscript?  saves you repeating dpkg-maintscript snippets in multiple places
[15:43] <tjaalton> slangasek: i've probably heard about it in the past but haven't used it..
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ironic [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:6.2.2-0ubuntu1]
[15:48] <sil2100> barry: hey! I checked it briefly, but I think we still need to wait the 7-day grace period for SRUs, no?
[15:49] <barry> sil2100: oh, maybe so
[15:52] <sil2100> Asking since maybe u-i has some exception or something, since I'm new to the SRU team
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: galileo (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1 => 0.5.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected galileo [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0-1ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted galileo [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0-1ubuntu1]
[16:07] <mapreri> rbasak: re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/galileo/+bug/1650046/comments/15 - yes, I work on Debian, and indeed I noticed it doesn't add Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed in the .changes, but didn't care till now since lauchpad seems to close bugs nonetheless.
[16:09] <mapreri> Do you mean that some other tool that you use to process SRUs rely on that field?  If so I guess I can just use -D"Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed=12345 6790" while building the source for SRUs
[16:14] <slangasek> mapreri: yes, the sru processing tools all look at the set of bugs in .changes to track what bugs need sru verification
[16:15] <mapreri> I wonder if I do something else to have dpkg behaves ubuntuish while doing ubuntu stuff.  maybe exporting DEB_VENDOR=ubuntu is enough for this.
[16:15] <mapreri> …if I *can* do something…
[16:16] <slangasek> mapreri: dpkg's behavior is sensitive to DEBEMAIL=.*ubuntu
[16:16] <Laney> that works, but you might have to make /etc/dpkg/origins/ubuntu exist first
[16:17] <mapreri> slangasek: o.O  that sounds so much like a layer violation
[16:17] <slangasek> none of the layers in between are interesting
[16:17] <mapreri> That said, I already export DEBEMAIL=*@debian.org so it'd still be something to change when I do ubuntu-only work.
[16:17] <mapreri> Laney: point, thanks
[16:18] <slangasek> Laney's trick might also work, I've never tried
[16:18] <Laney> I think it's the vendor rather than the email
[16:18] <rbasak> mapreri: yeah, what slangasek said. When I ran "sru-review" (the first step), the first thing it said was "NO BUGS!!1!". But if I ignored that and went ahead, I think the pending-sru report may be wrong as well (though haven't checked)
[16:18] <slangasek> rbasak: yes, it would be
[16:18] <Laney> The email thing is IIRC for screaming at you if you don't fix the maintainer
[16:19] <slangasek> rbasak: it's fair game (but not required) to reject, download, reupload w/ correct dpkg options, and accept, in such cases
[16:19] <mapreri> rbasak: I've did several SRU, and all of them the same way, it's the first time somebody bring this topic up.
[16:19] <rbasak> slangasek: indeed, and I did :-)
[16:19] <slangasek> ok :)
[16:19] <mapreri> Thanks for it, I'll improve/fixup my setup/workflow :)
[16:20] <rbasak> mapreri: no problem. Thank you for caring :-)
[16:22] <acheronuk> can a source be removed from zesty if it's still in debian unstable? and if so, if there any protection from someone trying to be helpful and re-syncing it?
[16:22] <mapreri> AFAIK yes on both, but nothing can stop somebody from manually uploading it.
[16:24] <acheronuk> mapreri: well, very unlikely anyone would want to do that with the old defunct KDE4 stuff I'm thinking of. so that seems to be ok
[16:26] <mapreri> acheronuk: well, if it's dead stuff, why not just get it RMed from debian?  (ubuntu will follow after some time, when a random Archive Admin gets more free time than usual to sync up on the removals)
[16:31] <acheronuk> mapreri: we are for once ahead of debian slightly on KDE applications, so they may still have some deps on some of it that we don't (or won't). may be able to do that with some though
[16:31] <mapreri> TBH, in the past I noticed a lot of K* packages that were several upstream version ahead in Ubuntu than in Debian, and I couldn't get it at all…
[16:32]  * mapreri is very biased, being both ubuntu and debian developer, and having "push ubuntu deltas into Debian" as one point of his MOTU application :)
[16:39] <robru> cpaelzer: only core dev can restart autopkgtests within the same package version
[16:41] <acheronuk> mapreri: yeah, 'for once' may have been a bad choice of words. 'once again' may be more accurate. but I've not been doing this that long, so my comparative memory is short
[16:43] <mapreri> acheronuk: doesn't actually really surprise this time, given that debian is freezing, though.
[16:45] <acheronuk> that is certainly part of it
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ngraph-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [6.07.02-2]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ntirpc [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170125) has been added
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-nebulouslabs-merkletree [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160203.0.f01b2e9-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ntirpc [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtrkcad [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:4.2.4a-1] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ngraph-gtk [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.07.02-2] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-huin-goupnp [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20161025.0.97f671e-1] (no packageset)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170125.3)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170125.3)
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glanceclient (trusty-proposed/main) [1:0.12.0-0ubuntu1.1 => 1:0.12.0-0ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)
[19:07] <cpaelzer> thanks robru
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appmenu-qt5 (xenial-proposed/main) [0.3.0+16.04.20151130-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.0+16.04.20151130-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[21:19] <lamont> oh hai.  I'm hoping to upload a package to zesty to address bug 1645912 sometime today/tomorrow morning.  Can I get feedback on that SRU info ahead of time, so that we can get the screaming, cursing, and crying done beforehand?
[21:43] <clivejo> anyone on the release team who could please review and accept the new KDE packages in the queue?
[21:46] <flocculant> fossfreedom: just for your information - I've been checking various flavours/greeters - you are affected by bug 1656399
[22:03] <camako> Does anyone know why I"m getting this error?
[22:03] <camako> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/303893883/buildlog_ubuntu-zesty-amd64.qtmir_0.5.1+17.04.20170125.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[22:03] <camako> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads
[22:04] <camako> this is ticket #2369
[22:04] <camako> trying to build qtmir
[22:15] <cjwatson> camako: it's normally -lpthread not -lpthreads ...
[22:15] <cjwatson> camako: probably a typo in your package
[22:16] <camako> cjwatson, thanks... I realized this wasn't the problem.
[22:16] <cjwatson> (don't see it in the qtmir diff, but maybe in a dependency)
[23:05] <fossfreedom> flocculant: yes - similarly affected (although you confirmed before I started looking!).  Thanks.  subscribing.
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.18.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.19.0-1ubuntu0.1]