[00:56] <bluesabre> flocculant, thanks for your investigation
[00:56] <bluesabre> if we were to abandon light-locker, xs and gs could probably be patched to listen for lightdm's unlock
[06:56] <flocculant> bluesabre: from a purely 'if it breaks again' my vote would go with gs simply because someone else uses it ...
[08:01] <Unit193> bluesabre: Oh right!  Reminder about the xfce icon theme?
[08:39] <ochosi> flocculant, bluesabre: someone else uses it, but it's just as unmaintained... (light-locker is also used by others btw)
[08:41] <Unit193> Yeah, but Ubuntu vs Lubuntu.
[08:44] <Unit193> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=gnome-screensaver Hmm.
[09:19] <ochosi> ubuntu only uses it as fallback
[10:54] <bluesabre> ochosi, right, but it does not require vt-switching or depend on another application or api, which are the three problems we keep having
[10:56] <bluesabre> being dm-independent, it's also more xfce-like
[14:54] <ochosi> bluesabre: right, but there are not so many other DMs you can nicely use with xfce anyway (apart from slim or whatnot)... GDM iirc was tightly integrated with gnome3/shell, not sure about kdm but i guess it also carries a butt-load of qt depends
[14:54] <ochosi> bluesabre: anyway, i don't mind gnome-screensaver, just saying (what i noticed before, as i've been actively using it for a while): it has similar issues with wake-on-suspend and lid-switch
[16:58] <flocculant> ochosi: not really sure we should go on this - currently have head in sand :0
[17:06] <flocculant> ochosi: gdm and kdm > http://paste.ubuntu.com/23870031/
[17:07] <flocculant> or rather sddm as kdm has gone in zesty
[20:29] <ochosi> flocculant: yeah, i'm not surprised
[20:40] <flocculant> ochosi: neither me :p
[20:41] <flocculant> slim doesn't look too bad - though it crashes without trace trying to lock that one :D
[20:42] <flocculant> so it only looked ok for a short while ...
[20:42] <flocculant> anyway not about too much tonight