[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170126)
[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170126)
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.10.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.04.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu2~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (xenial-backports/main) [2.7-0ubuntu2~ubuntu16.04.1 => 2.8-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1~16.04 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (xenial-backports) [2.8-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu2~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[00:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.04.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:48] <mwhudson> oh hell
[00:48] <mwhudson> all those uploads have bogus version numbers
[00:48] <mwhudson> any SRU teamers around? (slangasek?)
[01:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (precise-backports/universe) [1.0.8-0ubuntu0.3~ubuntu12.04.1 => 1.0.9-0ubuntu2~ubuntu12.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[01:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (precise-backports) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2~ubuntu12.04.1]
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[04:39] <tsimonq2> slangasek: When you have the chance, please update the topic in here then.
[04:46] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Sorry, that's a question, not a statement.
[05:13] <slangasek> mwhudson: needing some uploads rejected? which ones?
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: baitfisher [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] <slangasek> tsimonq2: what part of the topic to update?
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: baitfisher [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-httpcode [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: voro++ [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.4.6+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: baitfisher [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: baitfisher [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dirgra [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-triebeard [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] <valorie> slangasek: I think he was referring to the "Archive: open" bit
[05:21] <slangasek> ah; by and large it is open, I don't think we've been changing that for opt-in milestones?
[05:44] <valorie> slangasek: evidently the guidelines about that were a bit unclear
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-letsencrypt (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1 => 0.4.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[06:40] <apw> mwhudson, what were you saying had bad versions?
[06:52] <apw> mwhudson, ok it looks to me that the versions of runc, containerd and docker.io are suspect (variously in the future compared to zesty, in the past for -updates)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected containerd [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.5-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected runc [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.12.6-0ubuntu2~16.10.1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.12.6-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected runc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.10.1]
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected containerd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.2.5-0ubuntu2~16.10.1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baitfisher [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0+dfsg-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baitfisher [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.0+dfsg-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dirgra [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-httpcode [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baitfisher [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0+dfsg-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted voro++ [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.6+dfsg1-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baitfisher [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.0+dfsg-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgltf [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-triebeard [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jitescript [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ykush-control [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+ds-1]
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.8.0-1ubuntu1]
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [4.8.0-1ubuntu1]
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [4.8.0-1ubuntu1]
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xen [i386] (zesty-proposed) [4.8.0-1ubuntu1]
[07:58] <jibel> slangasek, thank you. We'll verify it today.
[08:38] <acheronuk> morning. I know there is a general archive migration block for alpha 2, but would it be possible to have a temporary block put on a couple of packages for when that is lifted?
[08:40] <acheronuk> namely libkcompactdisc (4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 to 4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1) and audiocd-kio (4:16.04.3-0ubuntu4 to 4:16.12.1-0ubuntu2)
[08:41] <acheronuk> seems from upstream that libkcompactdisc may be broken an needs dropping in the new version, so I would prefer that not to migrate until I have clarified the position with that
[08:42] <acheronuk> it is likely blocked by other things as well, so would not migrate, but an actual block would be nice just in case
[08:42] <acheronuk> thank you :)
[09:00] <apw> acheronuk, you can block that yourself using a launchpad bug ...i'll pm you the details
[10:01] <mapreri> umh, did the alpha2 planned for yesterday happened?  (asking because of freezed packages blocking migration of my pets)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scandir [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:13] <apw> mapreri, i belive it was moved out to friday for reasons
[10:13] <apw> tsimonq2 | slangasek: Ok, so please consider it postponed then. :)
[10:14] <mapreri> apw: which would be today, ok.
[10:19] <apw> mapreri, right
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (trusty-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20160408.1 => 20170127.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deft [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dustmite [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0~20170126.e95dff8-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gwcs [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dustmite [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0~20170126.e95dff8-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-open-symbols [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:31] <rbasak> Do I need a AA hat (that I don't have) to accept packages into stable releases from NEW? They're straight backports from newer releases due to package restructuring in a major version bump.
[12:31] <rbasak> Or can ~ubuntu-sru do that?
[12:49] <apw> rbasak, nominally there are never New (source) packages in an SRU, so you are in fuzzy land ...
[12:50] <jbicha> apw: it happens a fair amount, snapd was SRU'd to trusty
[12:51] <jbicha> I've got chrome-gnome-shell in the queue since Firefox 52 is breaking things :|
[12:52] <jbicha> and I'm working on the flatpak SRU since like snapd, it's useful for an LTS
[12:53] <apw> jbicha, oh i know it does :)  i just mean the rules are unclear
[12:54] <apw> for me i would say if the package is substantially the same as devel and therefore the normal New review has been done on it in devel already then it is reasonable for the sru-team to review and accept it
[13:06] <mapreri> I wonder why such backports can't go to xenial-backports instead?
[13:07] <mapreri> "because this newer package is useful for a LTS" really sound like a job for -backports to me.
[13:07] <rbasak> That's a fair question.
[13:07] <rbasak> I think it's when "it should be default". Which of course is a subjective judgement.
[13:07] <rbasak> In this case it's letsencrypt/certbot I'm looking at.
[13:07] <mapreri> (I also know that backports are lacking manpower to process things, right?)
[13:08] <rbasak> I don't feel that "lack of manpower" is a reasonable justification for using one process over another. We should decide the correct destination on its own merits, and then just require the manpower or else it doesn't get done.
[13:08] <rbasak> (or fix the need for the manpower, etc)
[13:09] <mapreri> rbasak: people that go to manually install a new packages are already doing something non-default and co very well add a line to sources.list, imho.
[13:09] <apw> rbasak, is this not a case of a package where the version of the package is tied to the service it supplies and not to our version of the OS
[13:10] <apw> rbasak, and you do not want to know you need backports on some releases and not others to have a working thing to talk to letsencrypt
[13:10] <rbasak> I disagree for two reasons. 1) Pragmatically, it's not helpful to Ubuntu if many users are using something old and out-of-date and our answer is "well, you should have known to type that extra bit to get backports"; and 2) there is also the upgrade-to-latest-in-this-release case; that's automatic, and users may expect for that to be bumped automatically for certain packages.
[13:10] <mapreri> apw: did letsencrypt change public API already?
[13:10] <rbasak> (diagree with mapreri, that is)
[13:11] <jbicha> mapreri: I will probably have either gnome-shell or ubuntu-gnome-desktop recommend or depend on chrome-gnome-shell and I think it's more appropriate for chrome-gnome-shell to be in -updates then
[13:11] <apw> mapreri, i am not sure if they have.  cirtainly with my sysadmin hat on i am already finding it confusing that my xenail box has the wrong command line that doesn't match that advertised by the letencrypt people and their docs
[13:11] <mapreri> apw: (I'm interested since I maintain letsencrypt.sh/dehydrated, but using always using the newest version through debian's jessie-backports doesn't make me notice breakages…)
[13:12] <apw> mapreri, yeah i presume it is not incompatible as it worked once i had worked out the old names
[13:12] <apw> though as this new naming is a trade-mark issue iiuc we may need to take that into account also
[13:13] <rbasak> I don't think it's necessary to consider trademarks here unless the trademark holder actually wants us to and asks.
[13:13] <rbasak> (and that's a thing that should go direct to the TB anyway)
[13:13] <mapreri> Last a Let's Encrypt person came to talk in letsencrypt-devel@lists.alioth.d.o, it seemed to me they were quite ok with old name being in already released things.
[13:13] <apw> (i would not count myself as authorative in these matters, and likely defer to infinity or slangasek)
[13:14] <rbasak> IMHO, it seems quite obvious to me that it's appropriate for this to land in an SRU.
[13:14] <mapreri> (I explicitly mentioned that xenial has '*letsnecryp*' packages)
[13:14] <rbasak> mapreri: if you object, then can you bring it up in ubuntu-devel@ please?
[13:14] <mapreri> Ack.
[13:15] <mapreri> I'll probably due it when I'm annoyed enough, not I'm not yet (+ too busy to write a whole nicely written email)
[13:15] <rbasak> mapreri: and if you intend to, then please tell me now and then do it soon, because otherwise I might end up accepting these in the next few hours.
[13:16]  * apw would tend to letting that in too with my SRU hat on ... assuming the old commandline is still present and compatible
[13:16] <mapreri> bah, go ahead and accept; I don't want to block things on my, well..  personal opionions.
[13:16] <apw> rbasak, is the old present and compatible ?
[13:16] <rbasak> mapreri: OK, thanks. But please do still bring it up if you feel appropriate. Our rules are that we operate by consensus, and you're part of that.
[13:17] <apw> right if you have concerns don't be steamrolled by the likes of me, for sure
[13:17] <rbasak> apw: I tried to get to the bottom of that question in the bug. I'm told yes, but there are some behavioural changes that I think I've been convinced are acceptable. Auto-renewal I think.
[13:18] <apw> a positive, that would have saved me writing some crappy scripts to do the same thing for sure
[13:18] <rbasak> Comment #5
[13:18] <mapreri> apw: I don't see python-certbot in the queue?
[13:19] <rbasak> mapreri: it's in new
[13:19] <rbasak> mapreri: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/python-letsencrypt/+bug/1640978/comments/34 for queue status
[13:19] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1640978 in python-certbot-nginx (Ubuntu Yakkety) "letsencrypt 0.4.1 contains numerous bugs fixed upstream" [Undecided,In progress]
[13:19] <mapreri> rbasak: ok, but shouldn't also be in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text= ?
[13:20] <rbasak> mapreri: it is, on the last page. The xorg stuff has swamped it.
[13:20] <mapreri> oh, paging -.-'  sorry, didn't even notice it didn't fit in a single page; it's so uncommon ^^
[13:21] <rbasak> It also happens on KDE day :-)
[13:22] <rbasak> I just pushed my git views to https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/+git/ if you want to be able to see the state of everything easily
[13:22] <jbicha> yeah, certbot's automatic cron job is a nice improvement
[13:23] <rbasak> jbicha, mapreri, apw: I appreciate the cron job is a nice improvement; do you think it's acceptable to do that to existing users in an SRU though?
[13:23] <rbasak> I think it's probably OK, but I'm also interested in your opinions.
[13:24] <mapreri> Personal option: does it adds a NEWS item (that would cause me to get an email on automatic upgrades)?  If so, I'd find it borderline; otherwise I wouldn't want an automatic cronjob to appear out of nothing in a production system.
[13:24] <jbicha> rbasak: my opinion is that yes, it's a good thing because of how important is is that https certificates don't accidentally expire and how short the letsencrypt validity is
[13:24] <jbicha> but mention it clearly in the d/changelog
[13:25]  * mapreri might be an old-style grumpy guy, despite his age…
[13:25] <jbicha> mapreri: I think it's rare for Ubuntu users to ever see debian/NEWS updates
[13:26] <rbasak> mapreri: there was discussion of a note-upon-installation, which I assumed to be debconf so didn't think users would see it on automatic update (which is the default). But NEWS is a great idea, thanks. And changelog, thanks jbicha. I see no reason we shouldn't have it in there.
[13:26] <mapreri> yeah, I install apt-listchanges everywhere for a reason… otherwise what's the whole point of NEWS…
[13:28] <mapreri> yeah, debconf is not shown with the noninteractive frontend, which is what automatic things do.
[13:28] <jbicha> rbasak: only security updates are automatically installed unless a user opted in to get other updates automatically too
[13:28] <rbasak> I've made a note to check for NEWS/changelog, and will ask for that if not present before accepting.
[13:28] <rbasak> jbicha: oh yeah. Good point.
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: skysentials (zesty-proposed/primary) [1.0.1-5]
[14:37] <clivejo> Can someone please force the s390x failing autopkgtest for kdeconnect/1.0.3-0ubuntu1?
[14:54] <chrisccoulson> will 12.04 reach EOL before or after April 18th?
[15:36] <apw> clivejo, is there some background on why that is ok to ignore ?
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qm-dsp [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:03] <smb> I was checking status for Xen I uploaded. It seems the only thing holding it in proposed is a dpdk test on ppc64el, though the log of that looks odd to me
[16:04] <smb> not really telling why it seems to fail
[16:06] <apw> smb, looks to fail for all and any trigger, ie regardless of whether your xen is installed, and all failures are with the new version of dpdk in -proposed
[16:07] <smb> apw, yeah and though in theory it might pull in libxl from xen with some effect it is not really obvious why that would only be a problem on one arch
[16:08] <apw> smb, right but it fails with the -release and -propsoed version of xen available
[16:08] <smb> apw, ah ok. did not get that
[16:12] <smb> apw, So in that case, maybe it is ok to let xen go into the out...
[16:16] <apw> smb, yeah i think so ... will look at doing that
[16:17] <smb> apw, ok, thanks a lot
[16:23] <slangasek> Laney: do you know of a way to see after the fact who triggered dpdk tests for the dpdk in -proposed on grep, pax-utils, gawk, and python-defaults, which never before needed triggered? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dpdk/zesty/ppc64el
[16:26] <apw> slangasek, all of the ones which are odd are also armhf
[16:26]  * slangasek nods
[16:27] <apw> slangasek, well actually armhf, ppc64el and s390x and only those three
[16:28] <slangasek> and the other archs were also tested against zesty, but /only/ against zesty
[16:28] <slangasek> and then ppc64el etc. were tested /only/ against zesty-proposed
[16:29] <apw> nnng
[16:30] <apw> slangasek, and dpdk doesn't build at all for any of the architecures it was rerun on!
[16:31] <apw> slangasek, oh the very latest upload of dpdk disables its dep8 tests ...
[16:32] <apw> slangasek, oh no _now_ i am getting versions backwards
[16:32] <zul> can an archvie admin please review python-os-xenapi please? It will be starting to block nova
[16:33] <apw> slangasek, oh again, they are meant to be reporting results to logs and succeding ...
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: firefox [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [51.0.1+build2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:35] <stokachu> so if i want to turn a package into a transitional one in favor of a snap distribution do i put a message in a postinst script directing the user to snap install instead?
[16:55] <slangasek> stokachu: that is a minimum and least-controversial transition strategy; let's start there
[17:01] <stokachu> slangasek, ok ill get something together for review
[17:04] <stokachu> slangasek, would you be willing to look at my debian/ on github with what I have so far?
[17:13] <stokachu> https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/tree/rm-deb-for-snap/debian just whenever you get a moment slangasek
[17:14] <stokachu> basically removed the package deps and updated the postinst script
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.1.0-1ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdist-zilla-plugin-test-compile-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2.056-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-unixsock-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmoosex-types-email-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.007-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.2-1build4~16.04.1]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wc-mode [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.1.0-1ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-freedreno-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-1build1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ostree (xenial-proposed/primary) [2016.15-2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-certbot-apache (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.9.3-1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-certbot (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.9.3-1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: php-gearman (xenial-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-96-ge77f981+1.1.2+-2~ubuntu16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: subiquity (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.0.24.1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-certbot-nginx (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.9.3-1~16.04.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: chrome-gnome-shell (xenial-proposed/primary) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.04.0]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.1.0-2ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.33.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.1.0-2ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.6-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.7-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.8-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.8-1ubuntu6~16.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.6-2build5~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-geode-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [2.11.18-2~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ostree (xenial-proposed/primary) [2016.15-2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-certbot-nginx (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.9.3-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: php-gearman (xenial-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-96-ge77f981+1.1.2+-2~ubuntu16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xorg-hwe-16.04 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7.1-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: chrome-gnome-shell (xenial-proposed/primary) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.04.0]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20160706-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-certbot (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.9.3-1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20160706-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: subiquity (xenial-proposed/primary) [0.0.24.1~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mga-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.4-1build2~16.04.1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.3+git20160310-1~16.04.1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.3+git20160310-1~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-freedreno-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.4.0-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build5~16.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-freedreno-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.4.0-1build1~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-cirrus-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.3-1ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:35] <flexiondotorg> flocculant You about?
[18:43] <flocculant>  flexiondotorg ish
[18:43] <flexiondotorg> Do you know if the alpha2 release is happening?
[18:44] <flexiondotorg> I've been busy with other stuff today.
[18:44] <flexiondotorg> All set, but unsure what's going on.
[18:44] <flocculant> flexiondotorg: oh - not a clue - haven't been following that as we're not taking part
[18:44] <flexiondotorg> OK
[18:44] <flocculant> I did see mail pushing back to release today
[18:44] <flexiondotorg> Yeah, because Kubuntu.
[18:45] <flocculant> no idea about that either :)
[18:45] <flexiondotorg> But Lubuntu are still not marked ready either.
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] <flocculant> no - I saw that
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.12-2~16.04.1]
[18:45] <flocculant> or rather yes I know - I saw that :p
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.7-1build5~16.04.1]
[18:49] <flocculant> tbh given it's alpha2 I'd not have held it if flavours have problems
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-3ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.1-1~16.04.1]
[18:51] <flocculant> that said if I was testing and having grub problems I'd not release either :D
[19:03] <tsimonq2> flocculant, flexiondotorg: Yep, Alpha 2 today
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1]
[19:06] <tsimonq2> Waiting on wxl to give his thumbs up to release.
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-hwe-16.04 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.7+13ubuntu4~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdist-zilla-plugin-test-compile-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.056-1]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wc-mode [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.3-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deft [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.7-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dustmite [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0~20170126.e95dff8-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtest-unixsock-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dustmite [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0~20170126.e95dff8-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gwcs [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.7-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmoosex-types-email-perl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.007-1]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inkscape-open-symbols [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-1]
[19:27] <lamont> cyphermox: you around?
[19:35] <tsimonq2> slangasek: You can mark Lubuntu and Kubuntu as ready, just got off the phone with Walter Lapchynski. Also, ready to release this thing? :)
[19:36] <flocculant> tsimonq2: I can mark them
[19:36] <flocculant> I believe
[19:36] <tsimonq2> flocculant: Please do :)
[19:36] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yeah, should be the product manager marking them
[19:37] <flocculant> well I won't then
[19:37] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Walter is sick, he gave me explicit permission to mark them.
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (yakkety-proposed/main) [7.11.90.20161005-0ubuntu1 => 7.11.90.20161005-0ubuntu2] (core)
[19:44] <bdmurray> slangasek: could you review gdb for yakkety?
[19:44] <cyphermox> lamont: what's up
[19:44] <lamont> cyphermox: open-iscsi/zesty...
[19:46] <lamont> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi <-- cyphermox you'll note that zesty is still lacking ipv6 happiness... I am very seriously inclined to just remove that *()(&*)(U  test
[19:47] <cyphermox> Yuck.
[19:47] <lamont> cyphermox: you wanna take a stab at it again, or shall we just nuke the test from orbit.
[19:47] <lamont> ?
[19:47] <cyphermox> Please don't just yet, i will look at it again
[19:48] <lamont> thanks.  ISTR that the only place it actually fails is inside autopkgtst
[19:48] <lamont> cyphermox: do you care if I have these fine people override the failure for the moment?
[19:49]  * lamont is trying to get to where he can actually test some freeipmi changes so that he can do _that_ SRU
[19:49] <cyphermox> No, it would be the "right" thing to do
[19:49] <cyphermox> The test is broke, not the package
[19:50] <lamont> slangasek: can you pretty please get out a large bat and make open-iscsi land in zesty?
[20:07] <clivejo> apw: I've spoken with the upstream devel at KDE and made them aware of the failure on s390x.  They are looking into it and will fix it in version 1.1.0.  Can it be ignored we we can get this version into the archive and tested?
[20:10] <tsimonq2> slangasek: We're good to release then though?
[20:17] <slangasek> tsimonq2: it looks like the tooling may need some updating still for budgie: ERROR: Cannot handle product Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64
[20:17] <slangasek> working on it
[20:18] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok, thank you.
[20:20] <slangasek> lamont: open-iscsi landing - so you're not uploading it to neuter the broken test?
[20:20] <tsimonq2>  /or
[20:20] <tsimonq2> Whoops
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been marked as ready
[20:27] <wxl> i'm going to unmark lubuntu ppc
[20:28] <slangasek> wxl: ok
[20:28] <slangasek> wxl: mp welcome to drop it from the default image build list
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] has been disabled
[20:29] <wxl> yeah probably something we should get around to
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] has been disabled
[20:45] <tsimonq2> slangasek: How's that tooling problem coming along?
[20:45] <slangasek> tsimonq2: oh, that's already sorted; I'm on the last step before publishing
[20:45] <slangasek> tsimonq2: syncing mirrors now
[20:46] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok, let me know when I can send emails.
[20:46] <slangasek> tsimonq2: when you see all the flavors have the milestone published on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ :)
[20:46] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok cool :)
[20:51] <mhall119> apw: is there a formal process for ignoring test failures for desktop packages (like kde-connect) on s390x, which isn't really a target platform for them?
[20:53] <mhall119> or even just leaving it out for that arch ( if this is okay by clivejo )
[20:54] <clivejo> I dont know of any way to pick and choose the arch tests run on
[20:54] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok, preparing and sending emails
[20:54] <mhall119> clivejo: I meant leaving the package out of s390x builds altogether
[20:55] <acheronuk> mhall119: I usually just ask here with a reasoned logic for ignoring the test
[20:58] <acheronuk> in this case kubuntu doesn't support that architecture, and as you say it's pretty much an irrelevance for a desktop package.
[20:59] <mhall119> so, does that mean it can get a pass on that, and make it into zesty?
[20:59] <clivejo> we need an ignore for now
[21:00] <acheronuk> mhall119: I would imagine so. this test failure is a of close to zero impact as you might get
[21:02] <slangasek> mhall119, clivejo: if the test has never passed on s390x, test failures will be ignored. If the test doesn't matter on that architecture, you can also make it a no-op pass in debian/tests.
[21:03] <slangasek> when it's a package you're responsible for, asking here for tests to be ignored should only be a temporary workaround to unblock transitions; it's a bad workaround if you're always asking here for them to be ignored, instead of fixing the tests (FSVO "fixing")
[21:04] <clivejo> slangasek: can you suggest documentation on making it a no-op pass?
[21:05] <acheronuk> slangasek: I don't recall that in the test specification docs I have seen?
[21:05] <cyphermox> slangasek: open-iscsi> I'll do a new upload with the test fixed; but I want to actually fix it first ;)
[21:10] <slangasek> clivejo: check the current architecture with dpkg, and exit 0
[21:10] <slangasek> acheronuk: it's not part of a test specification doc, it's me on behalf of the release team saying "don't make all the test failures the release team's problem" :)
[21:12] <acheronuk> slangasek: "If the test doesn't matter on that architecture, you can also make it a no-op pass in debian/tests"
[21:12] <acheronuk> there is no option for that though
[21:12] <slangasek> cyphermox: so I should honor lamont's request to let the current package in in the meantime, and then you're owning fixing the test for the next upload?
[21:12] <slangasek> acheronuk: it's as I said to clivejo - you check the value of the architecture w/ dpkg and short-circuit the test
[21:13] <acheronuk> slangasek: ooooh. sorry. I missed that comment!
[21:16] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Released
[21:19] <cyphermox> slangasek: yes
[21:19] <tsimonq2> Gah, I made a mistake in the announcement /o\
[21:20] <tsimonq2> Oh well
[21:25] <slangasek> cyphermox, lamont: open-iscsi also shows regressing tests for nova; has anyone looked at those?
[21:39] <cyphermox> slangasek: lamont said he re-ran them earlier
[21:39] <cyphermox> looks green to me?
[21:39]  * slangasek crosses his eyes and hits reload
[21:40] <slangasek> sho'nuff
[21:40] <slangasek> tsimonq2: unfreezing now; thanks!
[21:57] <tjaalton> could someone ack freeipa from zesty-proposed, it can migrate without dogtag-pki and sssd which are holding it back..
[21:57] <tjaalton> oh hmm
[21:57] <tsimonq2> slangasek: \o/
[22:04] <tjaalton> nevermind, spotted there was a phony dep
[22:07] <tjaalton> but can tomcat 8.5 be removed from zesty-proposed and keep it blocked for now?
[22:07] <tjaalton> it's messing up things, because it breaks dogtag and that keeps things from moving to updates
[22:07] <tjaalton> err, main
[22:10] <nacc> tjaalton: yeah, that was the problem i was running into when i looked last at the same
[22:13] <tjaalton> nacc: right, upstream is working on it but it's going to be a huge change and will take time
[22:13] <nacc> tjaalton: ack
[22:15] <tjaalton> nacc: hey, you're an admin on ubuntu-server team?
[22:18] <nacc> tjaalton: i think so
[22:20] <tjaalton> nacc: could you add a bug subscription on libhttp-parser? it's needed for MIR
[22:20] <tjaalton> so sssd can migrate
[22:20] <tjaalton> http-parser
[22:21] <nacc> looking
[22:23] <nacc> jgrimm: --^ ?
[22:23] <jgrimm> looking
[22:23] <tjaalton> bug #1638957
[22:23] <ubot5> bug 1638957 in http-parser (Ubuntu) "[MIR] http-parser, dependency of sssd" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638957
[22:24] <jgrimm> tsimonq2, subscription added
[22:25] <tjaalton> thanks ;)
[22:25] <tjaalton> mterry: ^
[22:25] <nacc> tjaalton: sorry, wanted to confirm with jgrimm before subscribing us :)
[22:25] <jgrimm> np. added comment as such too
[22:25] <nacc> jgrimm: thanks!
[22:25] <tjaalton> nacc: np, thanks
[22:26] <mterry> tjaalton: cool -- and per your other comment, you're right that the test suite is already being run -- I had missed that, whoops.  Just waiting on security then
[22:30] <lamont> slangasek: woot!  thanks man
[22:32] <lamont> slangasek: though open-iscsi still seems wedged in zesty-proposed. :/
[22:32] <lamont> or am I just too impatient?
[22:38] <infinity> lamont: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu14/+publishinghistory
[22:38] <infinity> lamont: You're impatient.
[22:46] <lamont> infinity: there was a reason I used the word "too."  all my loved, l
[22:46] <lamont> s/d,/,/
[22:47] <lamont> I _do_ find a certain amusement in launchpad claiming that both 8 and 14 are in release now, 14  as of "3 minutes ago"
[22:50] <infinity> lamont: New one is added before domination runs and decides the old one is redundant.  That's just the publisher's design.  *shrug*
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.21 => 2.22] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.21+16.10 => 2.22+16.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:57] <bdmurray> infinity: Would this 404'ing be an issue? http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty/InRelease
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.21~14.04.2 => 2.22~14.04] (no packageset)
[23:12] <lamont> infinity: hadn't actually seen it before, but it makes sense
[23:41] <infinity> bdmurray: No.
[23:42] <infinity> bdmurray: We explicitly didn't turn on InRelease (well, actually, we turned it on, killed the network, and turned it back off) because of an apt misfeature where swapping from Release+Release.gpg to InRelease causes everyone to redownload ALL the referenced files.
[23:43] <infinity> That was not a fun day.
[23:44] <bdmurray> Okay, its there for other releases and I saw the 404 when looking at my debmirror issue.