[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.22+16.10] [07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.22] [10:44] looks like all the flavours who took part in a2 haven't got up to date iso's [10:44] slangasek: ^^ [11:02] jbicha, hmmm, that is possibly true. first i have retried that to see if it is transient. _but_ as the self-tests for -9.6 are failing i suspect we don't want that making it out [16:52] cyphermox: bug 1660159 [16:52] bug 1660159 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "os-prober fails to see installed *buntu systems" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1660159 [16:55] what about 1.73ubuntu2? [16:56] much the same I suppose, but just in case since ..ubuntu1 was indeed broken. [16:56] 1.73ubuntu2 is what I had which was broken [16:57] should be the version installed on the bug report [16:57] yea [16:58] cyphermox: 1.70.ubuntu5 was the newest I'd grabbed which worked [16:58] oh, I see, I fails to read [16:58] :) [16:59] that's ok - it IS Sunday :) [16:59] what is the partitioning like on that system, could you attach fdisk -l ? [16:59] yup [17:01] cyphermox: done [17:02] oh meh - editing lp comments would be useful sometimes - I meant also to say there are 3 other drives - but all are data only [17:03] ok [17:08] flocculant: is any of it LVM or crypto?\ [17:08] cyphermox: no - none are [17:09] I see; I think I know what's wrong [17:09] it's going to be ugly to fix and test [17:09] ... [17:10] thanks for the report, I'll try to fix that tomorrow :) [17:10] well it could be worse I suppose - it could be April 12th :) [17:10] heh [17:10] cyphermox: anyway - any questions or requests just ask [17:10] alright [17:11] I thought it might be useful to mention this bug asap ;) [17:12] yeah [17:12] aren't you wasting a lot of space on that disk? [17:13] (I'm just curious because the numbers don't add up, I just want to make sure I can still do math) [17:15] cyphermox: there are some small 1.5Mb unallocated between and 43Gb unallocated at the end [17:16] ok :) [17:17] it did have one small one at the end to stop the installer messing with the extended partition [17:17] I seem to have lost that one somewhere :p [17:42] apw: thanks [18:05] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/qemu/+bug/1656480 marked 'verification-done'. I've provided all the steps to verify just in case. [18:05] Ubuntu bug 1656480 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "QEMU Does not Send L2 Broadcasts After Live Migration" [High,Fix committed] [21:01] Dmitrii-Sh, thanks [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.04.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset) [23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1~16.04 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (no packageset) [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.04.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.10.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.10.1] (no packageset) [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (no packageset) [23:04] right, i now have some perl to ensure better version numbers...