[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.22+16.10]
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.22]
[10:44] <flocculant> looks like all the flavours who took part in a2 haven't got up to date iso's
[10:44] <flocculant> slangasek: ^^
[11:02] <apw> jbicha, hmmm, that is possibly true.  first i have retried that to see if it is transient.  _but_ as the self-tests for -9.6 are failing i suspect we don't want that making it out
[16:52] <flocculant> cyphermox: bug 1660159
[16:55] <cyphermox> what about 1.73ubuntu2?
[16:56] <cyphermox> much the same I suppose, but just in case since ..ubuntu1 was indeed broken.
[16:56] <flocculant> 1.73ubuntu2 is what I had which was broken
[16:57] <flocculant> should be the version installed on the bug report
[16:57] <flocculant> yea
[16:58] <flocculant> cyphermox: 1.70.ubuntu5 was the newest I'd grabbed which worked
[16:58] <cyphermox> oh, I see, I fails to read
[16:58] <flocculant> :)
[16:59] <flocculant> that's ok - it IS Sunday :)
[16:59] <cyphermox> what is the partitioning like on that system, could you attach fdisk -l ?
[16:59] <flocculant> yup
[17:01] <flocculant> cyphermox: done
[17:02] <flocculant> oh meh - editing lp comments would be useful sometimes - I meant also to say there are 3 other drives - but all are data only
[17:03] <cyphermox> ok
[17:08] <cyphermox> flocculant: is any of it LVM or crypto?\
[17:08] <flocculant> cyphermox: no - none are
[17:09] <cyphermox> I see; I think I know what's wrong
[17:09] <cyphermox> it's going to be ugly to fix and test
[17:09] <flocculant> ...
[17:10] <cyphermox> thanks for the report, I'll try to fix that tomorrow :)
[17:10] <flocculant> well it could be worse I suppose - it could be April 12th :)
[17:10] <cyphermox> heh
[17:10] <flocculant> cyphermox: anyway - any questions or requests just ask
[17:10] <cyphermox> alright
[17:11] <flocculant> I thought it might be useful to mention this bug asap ;)
[17:12] <cyphermox> yeah
[17:12] <cyphermox> aren't you wasting a lot of space on that disk?
[17:13] <cyphermox> (I'm just curious because the numbers don't add up, I just want to make sure I can still do math)
[17:15] <flocculant> cyphermox: there are some small 1.5Mb unallocated between and 43Gb unallocated at the end
[17:16] <cyphermox> ok :)
[17:17] <flocculant> it did have one small one at the end to stop the installer messing with the extended partition
[17:17] <flocculant> I seem to have lost that one somewhere :p
[17:42] <mwhudson> apw: thanks
[18:05] <Dmitrii-Sh> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/qemu/+bug/1656480 marked 'verification-done'. I've provided all the steps to verify just in case.
[21:01] <apw> Dmitrii-Sh, thanks
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.04.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1~16.04 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.2.5-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.04.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2~16.10.1.1 => 1.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-0ubuntu4~16.10.2 => 1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (no packageset)
[23:04] <mwhudson> right, i now have some perl to ensure better version numbers...