=== Darcy is now known as Spydar007 | ||
tyhicks | hello | 16:31 |
---|---|---|
mdeslaur | \o | 16:31 |
tyhicks | #startmeeting | 16:31 |
meetingology | Meeting started Mon Jan 30 16:31:40 2017 UTC. The chair is tyhicks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 16:31 |
meetingology | Available commands: action commands idea info link nick | 16:31 |
tyhicks | The meeting agenda can be found at: | 16:31 |
tyhicks | [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting | 16:31 |
tyhicks | no announcements today | 16:31 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report | 16:31 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Weekly stand-up report | ||
tyhicks | jdstrand: you're up | 16:31 |
jdstrand | hi! | 16:32 |
jdstrand | short week this week (off firday) | 16:32 |
jdstrand | mostly caught up on snappy reviews. After driving them to 0 by eod on Friday, now have 3 followup reviews that came in today | 16:32 |
jdstrand | I plan to get back to seccomp arg filtering policy this week | 16:32 |
jdstrand | I'll move the miscellaneous review tools updates card if I have time | 16:32 |
jdstrand | that's it from me. mdeslaur, you're up | 16:33 |
mdeslaur | I'm in the happy place | 16:33 |
mdeslaur | currently working on openssl updates | 16:33 |
mdeslaur | have a bunch of pending updates to test and publish | 16:33 |
mdeslaur | that's it from me, sbeattie? | 16:33 |
sbeattie | I'm on community this week. | 16:33 |
sbeattie | I'll have kernel USNs to publish this week | 16:34 |
sbeattie | I need to finish testing the openssh update I was working. | 16:34 |
sbeattie | And then I'll poke at the list of outstanding issues | 16:35 |
sbeattie | That's it for me. tyhicks? | 16:35 |
tyhicks | I'm on bug triage this week | 16:35 |
tyhicks | cve triage last week kept me from making much progress on work items | 16:35 |
tyhicks | I need to submit my second revision of seccomp patches to lkml | 16:36 |
tyhicks | workaround an apparmor utils bug that is keeping me from uploading apparmor 2.11 to zesty | 16:36 |
tyhicks | I have 2 embargoed issues | 16:37 |
tyhicks | that's it for me | 16:37 |
tyhicks | jjohansen: you're up | 16:37 |
jjohansen | I need to finish up with my end of the dconf work | 16:38 |
jjohansen | I have some patches to send up to the kt | 16:38 |
jjohansen | a reply to tetsuo to finish up and send out to lkml | 16:39 |
jjohansen | and I really need to finish looking at casey's latest round of stacking patches | 16:39 |
jjohansen | then if time more of the upstreaming work, plan is securityfs bits, that I didn't get to last week | 16:40 |
jjohansen | thats it for me, sarnold you're up | 16:41 |
sarnold | I'm on cve triage this week, working on MIRs in the remaining time | 16:41 |
sarnold | I expect to finish the apache mellon module mir today or tomorrow depending upon how busy MITRE's been, so it would be nice to have a new top priority soon | 16:42 |
sarnold | that's it for me, chrisccoulson? | 16:42 |
chrisccoulson | I've got an oxide update to do this week, and I expect to have chromium to sponsor as well | 16:42 |
chrisccoulson | Hopefully no other updates - thanks to a Firefox respin I ended up having to test that twice last week | 16:43 |
tyhicks | :( | 16:43 |
chrisccoulson | I've got a Firefox regression to fix, but that shouldn't take much time | 16:43 |
chrisccoulson | Other than that, I'm finishing off tests for work I did in oxide last week, then I plan to move on to bug 1637195 which should mostly be a copy / paste job from webbrowser-app | 16:44 |
ubottu | bug 1637195 in Oxide "Add JS dialogs to UbuntuWebView" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1637195 | 16:44 |
chrisccoulson | And I need to make some changes to my firefox menubar patch and send that upstream, although there's currently nobody assigned to review that anyway | 16:45 |
chrisccoulson | That's me done | 16:45 |
ratliff | I'm in the happy place this week | 16:45 |
ratliff | I have a few more updates for Snappy 15.04 to process | 16:45 |
ratliff | Then I will work some on the notification process | 16:46 |
ratliff | that's it for me this week | 16:46 |
ratliff | back to you tyhicks | 16:46 |
tyhicks | thanks! | 16:47 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Highlighted packages | 16:47 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Highlighted packages | ||
tyhicks | The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so. | 16:47 |
tyhicks | See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved. | 16:47 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/pen.html | 16:47 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/inn.html | 16:47 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/consolekit.html | 16:47 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/vxl.html | 16:47 |
tyhicks | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/lwipv6.html | 16:47 |
tyhicks | [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions | 16:47 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Miscellaneous and Questions | ||
tyhicks | Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss? | 16:47 |
tyhicks | jdstrand, mdeslaur, sbeattie, jjohansen, sarnold, ChrisCoulson, ratliff: Thanks! | 16:49 |
tyhicks | #endmeeting | 16:49 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Mon Jan 30 16:49:54 2017 UTC. | 16:49 |
meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-01-30-16.31.moin.txt | 16:49 |
sarnold | thanks tyhicks! | 16:50 |
ratliff | thanks tyhicks! | 16:50 |
sbeattie | tyhicks: thanks! | 16:50 |
mdeslaur | thanks tyhicks | 16:51 |
jjohansen | thanks tyhicks | 16:54 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: thanks! | 16:58 |
slashd | whois slashd | 18:38 |
slashd | disregard ^, forgot the "/" | 18:39 |
rbasak | o/ | 19:00 |
sil2100 | o/ | 19:00 |
rbasak | Who's here? | 19:00 |
rbasak | I have a hard stop in about an hour (depends on how long a drive somewhere will be). | 19:00 |
chiluk | o/ | 19:01 |
cyphermox | I'm here. | 19:01 |
chiluk | hey cyphermox | 19:01 |
sil2100 | Who's driving the meeting? | 19:03 |
chiluk | bdmurray ?? dmb meeting? | 19:03 |
sil2100 | The agenda mentions Adam | 19:03 |
sil2100 | chiluk: bdmurray won't be around sadly | 19:04 |
rbasak | It's been stuck at Adam for a long time :-/ | 19:04 |
rbasak | I'd prefer not to chair today please. Too many distractions here right now, and note my hard stop above. | 19:05 |
sil2100 | I was chairing the last meeting, the additional one we had because of the holidays | 19:05 |
sil2100 | But still, we miss one person... | 19:05 |
chiluk | infinity shows away as well | 19:06 |
chiluk | can't we just use his absence as passive consent? | 19:07 |
sarnold | :) | 19:07 |
chiluk | there's really no way infinity would admit that I'm coredev material... then again, I'm not sure if he'd say that about most coredevs. | 19:07 |
sil2100 | hah ;) | 19:07 |
rbasak | It is possible to hold a meeting and leave it to the ML to make a vote quorate. | 19:07 |
chiluk | I'm fine with that. | 19:07 |
sil2100 | Yeah, I guess if we won't get quorrum I'm +1 on continuing that on the ML | 19:08 |
sil2100 | Since we can't postpone this forever | 19:08 |
chiluk | yeah it's been almost 2 months now. | 19:08 |
chiluk | well since I was put on the agenda. | 19:08 |
sil2100 | We'll just have to make sure that the vote continues on the ML, since those tend to take a very long time as well if left as-is | 19:08 |
rbasak | Is the sponsorship miner down? | 19:08 |
rbasak | There is https://launchpad.net/~chiluk/+uploaded-packages | 19:09 |
rbasak | Which should be a subset I think. | 19:09 |
sil2100 | It works for me | 19:09 |
chiluk | http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi?render=html&sponsor=&sponsor_search=name&sponsoree=*Chiluk&sponsoree_search=name | 19:09 |
chiluk | is more complete | 19:09 |
rbasak | Hmm, working now. | 19:10 |
chiluk | but still not complete. | 19:10 |
sil2100 | cyphermox: can you chair? We could do as per rbasak's proposition - start the candidate review here and finish on the ML | 19:10 |
sil2100 | Ok then, I'll chair again in this case | 19:13 |
sil2100 | Need a minute though | 19:13 |
sil2100 | #startmeeting DMB meeting | 19:13 |
meetingology | Meeting started Mon Jan 30 19:13:59 2017 UTC. The chair is sil2100. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 19:13 |
meetingology | Available commands: action commands idea info link nick | 19:13 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB meeting | Current topic: | ||
sil2100 | #topic Review of previous action items | 19:14 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items | ||
sil2100 | rbasak to get mapreri's PPU additions done by the TB (carried over) <- is it still in progress? | 19:14 |
rbasak | I've not managed to address anything for the DMB yet this year - sorry. I believe it's still in progress. | 19:15 |
rbasak | IIRC, the TB did do something for us. I need to find out where it is. | 19:15 |
sil2100 | Ok, so I guess the other one is carried over as well | 19:16 |
sil2100 | Let's skip to the next point then | 19:16 |
sil2100 | #topic Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications | 19:16 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB meeting | Current topic: Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications | ||
sil2100 | I see we still have David's application on the agenda | 19:16 |
sil2100 | Does anyone know if the vote for that got finalized on the ML? | 19:17 |
sil2100 | I at least don't remember getting the rest of the votes for that one | 19:17 |
rbasak | I don't remember seeing any further votes on that. | 19:17 |
rbasak | Yeah, no replies AFAICS. | 19:18 |
mapreri | rbasak, sil2100: ISTR my PPU addition also required voting. | 19:18 |
mapreri | when did those happen? | 19:18 |
sil2100 | I don't think single additions require a vote, right? | 19:19 |
sil2100 | Just one DMB member, if he decides it's fitting, can do the permission changes - or am I wrong? | 19:19 |
rbasak | I think (and said) otherwise. | 19:19 |
rbasak | AFAIK, a packageset addition can be done by one DMB member verifying that the proposed new package meets the packageset criteria in the description. | 19:20 |
rbasak | But I'm not aware of anything like that for PPU. | 19:20 |
sil2100 | Ah, indeed | 19:20 |
sil2100 | You might be right | 19:20 |
mapreri | Yeah, I'm reporting due to what rbasak told me privately, given that I completely fail at finding a through description of DMB workflows :) | 19:20 |
rbasak | There may be a policy I don't recall or never read about. | 19:20 |
rbasak | All I know is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase | 19:20 |
rbasak | But, I think a vote for mapreri should be straightforward. | 19:21 |
mapreri | oh, consider that I'm DD requiring PPU for a package I maintain, that might streamline the process for this particular case. | 19:21 |
sil2100 | Should we vote? We don't have a quorrum so it'd have to go through the ML as well | 19:22 |
chiluk | if only I had a vote I'd vote for you mapreri.\ | 19:22 |
rbasak | Do we have a list of what mapreri can already upload? | 19:22 |
mapreri | rbasak: pbuilder and libreoffice-dictionaries are in my PPU list from main; then I'm also MOTU. | 19:23 |
mapreri | chiluk: :) | 19:23 |
rbasak | mapreri: how long have you had those? | 19:23 |
mapreri | rbasak: iirc early December 2016 | 19:23 |
rbasak | Ah, OK. | 19:24 |
sil2100 | Indeed: | 19:24 |
sil2100 | Archive Upload Rights for mapreri: archive 'primary', source package 'pbuilder' | 19:24 |
sil2100 | Archive Upload Rights for mapreri: archive 'primary', source package 'libreoffice-dictionaries'Archive Upload Rights for mapreri: archive 'primary', source package 'pbuilder' | 19:24 |
rbasak | mapreri: how long have you been maintaining inkscape in Debian? | 19:24 |
mapreri | rbasak: yeah, recently. | 19:24 |
sil2100 | Uh, double-paste I guess | 19:24 |
mapreri | uh | 19:24 |
mapreri | some time 2015 i think | 19:24 |
rbasak | 2015? | 19:24 |
rbasak | OK | 19:24 |
mapreri | my first thing in the changelog is 2014 | 19:25 |
rbasak | I'm ready to vote then. Shame we don't have quorum :-/ | 19:25 |
rbasak | (but we can do a partial vote now and try to finish it on the ML later) | 19:25 |
sil2100 | Yeah, let's vote, I'll push the rest to the ML | 19:25 |
mapreri | rbasak: (if it's still interesting) [ Mattia Rizzolo ]\n * debian/control: add myself to Uploaders => Apr 2015 | 19:25 |
sil2100 | #vote for mapreri to gain additional PPU rights for inkscape | 19:25 |
meetingology | Please vote on: for mapreri to gain additional PPU rights for inkscape | 19:25 |
meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) | 19:25 |
sil2100 | +1 | 19:26 |
meetingology | +1 received from sil2100 | 19:26 |
rbasak | +1 | 19:26 |
meetingology | +1 received from rbasak | 19:26 |
sil2100 | cyphermox: you still around? | 19:26 |
chiluk | sil2100: rbasak from KB "DDs who are PPU through the normal process can apply by email to have their access extended to further packages they (or a team they are a member of) maintain. This only requires one DMB member to agree in order to pass." | 19:28 |
rbasak | Ah | 19:28 |
sil2100 | Oh | 19:28 |
sil2100 | #endvote | 19:28 |
meetingology | Voting ended on: for mapreri to gain additional PPU rights for inkscape | 19:28 |
meetingology | Votes for:3 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 19:28 |
meetingology | Motion carried | 19:28 |
chiluk | sounds like it's a pass mapreri | 19:28 |
rbasak | OK, done then. Sorry mapreri, I could have just done it when you first asked. | 19:28 |
mapreri | Oh. Well, guess all learned something today :) | 19:29 |
sil2100 | Should I add an action item for each of us to look through the KB again? ;) | 19:29 |
chiluk | it's all the way at the bottom.. no one reads that far. | 19:30 |
sil2100 | Anyway, let's continue | 19:30 |
mapreri | Thank you, anyway! | 19:30 |
sil2100 | mapreri: you're welcome! | 19:30 |
sil2100 | rbasak: will you handle that? | 19:30 |
rbasak | Does someone want to take an action to sort that with the TB? | 19:30 |
rbasak | Sure. | 19:30 |
sil2100 | Thanks :) | 19:30 |
sil2100 | #topic Ubuntu Core Developer Applications | 19:30 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | DMB meeting | Current topic: Ubuntu Core Developer Applications | ||
cyphermox | sorry, i was on the phone | 19:31 |
sil2100 | #subtopic Dave Chiluk | 19:31 |
sil2100 | chiluk: could you introduce yourself? | 19:31 |
chiluk | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/chiluk/CoreDevApplication | 19:31 |
chiluk | I've been working for Canonical as a Sustaining engineer for the last 4 years fixing Ubuntu advantage customer issues. | 19:31 |
chiluk | many of which don't result in uploads. | 19:32 |
chiluk | I've had a LP id since 2008, and I think I started with Ubuntu in 06.. | 19:32 |
chiluk | so it's been a while. | 19:32 |
chiluk | I mostly fix packages in main, hence the Coredev app instead of MOTU. | 19:32 |
chiluk | and I also mostly do SRU's and not development uploads. | 19:33 |
chiluk | actually probably 80% of my uploads are SRUs. | 19:33 |
chiluk | which makes getting fixes out a real bear.. | 19:33 |
chiluk | since I currently need two other devs to approve any of my fixes. | 19:34 |
chiluk | I think that's most of it. | 19:34 |
rbasak | Two questions: 1) what are your goals with respect to upload rights; and 2) is not having core dev blocking you at the moment, apart from uploading SRUs, and if so, how? | 19:34 |
rbasak | IOW, are you asking for core dev just to fix the SRU problem? | 19:35 |
chiluk | rbasak: 1) I'd like upload rights so I no longer have to harass existing core devs. | 19:35 |
chiluk | 2.) it is blocking me at the moment. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1655225 | 19:36 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1655225 in qemu (Ubuntu) "Under heavy load qemu hits bdrv_error_action: Assertion `error >= 0' failed" [Medium,New] | 19:36 |
chiluk | is a good example | 19:36 |
chiluk | mostly I feel that me not having core dev puts an undo burden on the other core devs in the U.S. Timezones. | 19:36 |
chiluk | as I'm part of a larger team with few core devs. | 19:37 |
rbasak | Are you familiar with the conversation with - slashd I think? | 19:37 |
chiluk | rbasak I am. | 19:37 |
chiluk | and rbasak I'm not sure if that would be useful. | 19:38 |
rbasak | I'm sorry I haven't addressed that yet. | 19:38 |
rbasak | But I am interested in your opinion. Please go on. | 19:38 |
chiluk | rbasak, I'm also TIL on a few packages .. | 19:38 |
rbasak | (I'm sorry I have to run in 20 minutes, otherwise I'd chat for longer right now) | 19:38 |
chiluk | rbasak, also I'm not sure if having SRU only upload is even possible given the structure of teams in LP. | 19:38 |
chiluk | I do like the general idea, but I don't think it's doable given the current structure of development in Ubuntu. | 19:39 |
chiluk | unless there's something that LP can do that I'm not aware of. | 19:39 |
rbasak | My concern is that based on your application I feel that your experience is quite narrow. I would like to hear what others think of this kind of case. I appreciate the pain and I want to fix that. But does that mean it's appropriate to change ACLs bits to wide open? | 19:40 |
sil2100 | chiluk: I have a question regarding a recent discussion I saw on #ubuntu-devel - it seems one of your merges didn't have a correct changelog, right? | 19:41 |
rbasak | I'm really quite torn, and I think the answer to that question is bigger than just me or a few people on the DMB. | 19:41 |
chiluk | sil2100: yes that is correct. | 19:41 |
sil2100 | chiluk: why was that? Did you put non-remaining changes into the 'remaining changes' part by mistake? | 19:41 |
rbasak | And I'm interested to hear what some really-long-time Ubuntu devs think. | 19:41 |
sil2100 | (like, new changes) | 19:41 |
chiluk | sil2100: it was a merge I did this morning that I was TIL on. and yes it was a mistake... the change still existed, but it had been merged into debian.. | 19:42 |
sil2100 | Ah, ok | 19:42 |
chiluk | sil2100: I also do my best to get the corresponding dd or previous UCD to do the upload... which is part of the reason slangasek caught that one. | 19:43 |
chiluk | rbasak what other things do you think I need to broaden my experience? | 19:44 |
chiluk | I guess another reason I'd like to get coredev is so that I can manage series tracks in bugs. | 19:45 |
chiluk | I think there's another team for that, but coredev is definitely included in that group. | 19:46 |
chiluk | exuse me for a sec, but I need to make sure my dog is not being eaten by a coyote. | 19:47 |
cyphermox | well, everyone makes mistakes in changelogs every once in a while, or in merging anyway. I usually first go through making changelog and then ripping things out if it shows that they are in fact merged or no longer require | 19:47 |
sil2100 | chiluk: during your work on packages, did you have a lot experience with dealing with autopkgtests, proposed migration and the like? | 19:48 |
rbasak | chiluk: I think if I were to filter SRUs out of your endorsements and your sponsored uploads, it would be a bit thin. I'm not sure we'd give core dev to a hypothetical applicant with that application. | 19:48 |
rbasak | Now, it may be that Ubuntu devs say "yes but that's fine", and that's an open question that I'm not sure about. | 19:48 |
rbasak | I intend to prioritise getting that thread started about this. | 19:48 |
chiluk | sil2100: I did have to deal with autopkgtest failures with my core-utils upload, and possibly a few others. | 19:50 |
chiluk | but there are only a few. | 19:50 |
sil2100 | chiluk: did you always make sure that the packages that were sponsored for you made it to the release pocket? | 19:50 |
chiluk | always.. | 19:51 |
chiluk | that's part of our teams process. | 19:51 |
rbasak | I need to run very soon. | 19:51 |
chiluk | we don't close our customer cases, until our package uploads hit the -udates archives. | 19:51 |
sil2100 | Ok, I had one more question, but rbasak maybe you want me to start the vote now? | 19:51 |
chiluk | rbasak, additionally we are usually the first to do verification on the uploads as well.. | 19:51 |
rbasak | I would like to defer my vote for now, pending any outcome of the thread. I'm sorry I have not followed up on that yet. I will prioritise doing that. | 19:52 |
sil2100 | Ok | 19:52 |
rbasak | Especially now that there are two blocked on it. | 19:52 |
rbasak | I'm sorry for the pain and I really want to unblock you, but I also feel that it's a bigger issue that we should resolve, and that it's important for us to be consistent. | 19:52 |
sil2100 | In this case what I would propose is to take the vote to the mailing list in that case | 19:52 |
chiluk | rbasak: completely understood. | 19:52 |
chiluk | I just feel this is the next logical step for me to become more efficient.. and for the rest of the team to be more efficient by not having to micro-manage my uploads. | 19:53 |
sil2100 | There everyone will be able to think his decision though | 19:53 |
sil2100 | chiluk: ok, one semi-technical question - let's say you work on a package (or maybe sponsor some upload for someone) where you add a new binary dependency to a package | 19:53 |
rbasak | chiluk: to be clear, I'd be happy with you uploading SRUs without a sponsor. | 19:53 |
rbasak | Based on your application. | 19:54 |
rbasak | I'm just not sure that core dev is the right step, and that's what I'd like wider opinion on. | 19:54 |
chiluk | thanks rbasak | 19:54 |
sil2100 | chiluk: what would be the first few things you'd need to check in such a case? | 19:54 |
rbasak | I'm going to run as I need to be somewhere. | 19:54 |
sil2100 | rbasak: see you o/ | 19:54 |
rbasak | Sorry I couldn't help more today. | 19:54 |
rbasak | o/ | 19:54 |
chiluk | sil2100: add to debian/control, check for additional dependencies, then check for other packages that depend on the package I changed... | 19:55 |
chiluk | manifest for iso's may need to change as well. | 19:55 |
chiluk | also rebuilding may be necessary for all related packages | 19:55 |
chiluk | depending on the change. | 19:55 |
sil2100 | chiluk: ok, now let's say the package you work on is in main - does that opt for some additional change? | 19:55 |
sil2100 | I mean, additional check? | 19:55 |
chiluk | yes.. if the dependency is in universe | 19:56 |
sil2100 | That's what I wanted to hear | 19:56 |
chiluk | that universe package may have to be pulled into main as well... | 19:56 |
chiluk | I haven't had to do that yet. | 19:56 |
chiluk | but I'm aware of the restrictions related to it. | 19:56 |
sil2100 | It very frequently happens with packages that Canonical is upstream for | 19:56 |
sil2100 | Anyway | 19:56 |
chiluk | fortunately I will rarely be the uploader for those. | 19:57 |
sil2100 | Ok, those are all questions from me | 19:57 |
sil2100 | cyphermox: any questions? | 19:57 |
sil2100 | If not, I guess let's move this to a mailing thread and do the vote there | 19:57 |
chiluk | I'm ok with that. | 19:57 |
chiluk | infinity can reject me there. | 19:57 |
chiluk | because infinity. | 19:58 |
sil2100 | Noo, Adam's not like that! | 19:58 |
sil2100 | He's a good guy, really | 19:58 |
sil2100 | For realz | 19:58 |
sil2100 | Anyway, thanks for showing up and sorry for not being able to sort it out here | 19:58 |
chiluk | sil2100: i know... I just like to give him crap. | 19:58 |
sil2100 | ;) | 19:58 |
sil2100 | #endmeeting | 19:59 |
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
meetingology | Meeting ended Mon Jan 30 19:59:02 2017 UTC. | 19:59 |
meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-01-30-19.13.moin.txt | 19:59 |
sil2100 | I'll send out the e-mail in a bit | 19:59 |
sil2100 | Thanks everyone! | 19:59 |
chiluk | thanks sil2100, rbasak, cyphermox... fortunately my dog was not eaten, but she did find something she's trying to kill. | 19:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!