slangasek | flocculant: cron fixed | 02:10 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170130) | 03:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Zesty Alpha 2] has been updated (20170130) | 03:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop powerpc [Zesty Alpha 2] (20170130) has been added | 03:55 | |
jbicha | slangasek: I guess Zesty Alpha 2 needs to be marked as Released in the iso tracker to quiet the queuebot ^ | 04:22 |
acheronuk | Hi. Could someone please take a look at the new sources in the queue for KDE applications 16.12.1? thank you | 11:02 |
ginggs | how does one mark a package so that its autopkgtests run on a 'big' host? Iirc, p.itti may have done something like that for the julia package | 11:20 |
apw | ginggs, that is a server side configuration, so you need to "ask" here | 11:41 |
ginggs | apw: what is it called, and does it work for all architectures? | 11:43 |
apw | ginggs, its part of the primary configuration for the autopkgtest builder hosts | 11:44 |
ginggs | apw: so what do i need to ask for, and will it help on ppc64el, for example? | 11:47 |
apw | i don't think it affects anything other than the virtual machine architectures | 11:49 |
apw | but i would defer to Laney for more knowledge | 11:49 |
flocculant | slangasek: ty :) | 11:54 |
ginggs | apw: I think it was setting '--flavor m1.large' and I think it would have been for amd64, because julia's tests don't succeed anywhere else. Anyway, could we do this for python-hypothesis please? | 12:02 |
apw | ginggs, that is the effect for scaling stack yes,but it is a mark of "huge" for the package as a whole | 12:03 |
ginggs | apw: so can we mark python-hypothesis "huge" please? | 12:15 |
apw | ginggs, will see what i can do | 12:25 |
ginggs | apw: thanks! | 12:25 |
fossfreedom_ | jbicha: quick question - I saw you have a v0.22 in zesty proposed - in debian sid shotwell is v0.25 - I thought for zesty we should be syncing against sid/testing - why are we still at the rather elderly v0.22 series? | 12:47 |
jbicha | fossfreedom_: see bug 1581180 particularly comment 2 | 12:53 |
ubot5 | bug 1581180 in shotwell (Ubuntu) "Update to Shotwell 0.24.x" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581180 | 12:53 |
jbicha | odd numbers are unstable releases so Debian should have stayed with 0.24 since Debian is freezing for release now | 12:54 |
fossfreedom_ | k - thanks for the feedback. agreed - very much a blocker :( | 12:55 |
fossfreedom_ | the reason for the question - for Ubuntu Budgie we were going to drop GNOME Photos in favour for the new shotwell. Guess we can't. | 12:56 |
jbicha | the bug is available for anyone to work on; the important thing is to not regress Ubuntu Online Accounts support (or anything else) | 13:01 |
jbicha | it was too challenging for me 6 months ago but I haven't looked at it recently | 13:02 |
cpaelzer | FYI I've seen multiple reverse dependencies tests breaking on the synced Debian DPDK - I'm working to get a fix to Debian and sync a newer one then | 13:15 |
apw | ginggs, ok that should be in production (if i have done it right) | 14:00 |
ginggs | apw: thanks, let me try kicking off a test - should know in about 45 minutes | 14:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:15 | |
elopio | join #ubuntu-devel | 14:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.2-1] | 14:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted u-boot-menu [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1] | 14:54 | |
flocculant | do I have to? | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, please remove the block proposed to ocaml stuff? it shouldn't be needed anymore, and maybe Debian will fix them | 14:58 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, gone | 15:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | <3 ta! | 15:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:31 | |
ginggs | apw: \o/ that worked, thanks! | 15:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:33 | |
apw | ginggs, good! | 15:34 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.12.1-1] | 15:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-murano-pkg-check (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 15:36 | |
ogra_ | infinity, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/16/current/current/ misses .htacces it seems (i see FOOTER and HEASDER as files there) | 15:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpgme1.0 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.8.0-3ubuntu1] (core) | 16:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpgme1.0 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.8.0-3ubuntu1] (core) | 16:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpgme1.0 [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.8.0-3ubuntu1] (core) | 16:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpgme1.0 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.8.0-3ubuntu1] (core) | 16:47 | |
smoser | hi, can i get someone to release the cloud-init yakkety SRU ? | 17:52 |
smoser | josvaz, ^ | 17:52 |
apw | smoser, looking | 18:10 |
apw | smoser, done | 18:19 |
smoser | apw, thank you. | 18:38 |
infinity | ogra_: Who set that up? | 20:18 |
ogra_ | infinity, i thought that was you | 20:18 |
ogra_ | "foundations" :) | 20:18 |
infinity | Certainly not me, maybe "us". | 20:18 |
ogra_ | slangasek, who set up http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/16/current/current/ ? | 20:18 |
* ogra_ would also liek to know if there are any builds for the edge channel | 20:19 | |
ogra_ | *like | 20:19 |
infinity | Anyhow, if it's published by the cdimage code, .htaccess is meant to be written automatically. If that was slapped together by hand, or is an in-progress thing, patience? | 20:20 |
ogra_ | yeah, no hurry | 20:21 |
slangasek | ogra_: current/current? Do you mean stable/current? | 20:22 |
slangasek | I set that up | 20:22 |
ogra_ | slangasek, just a copy/paste from my browser | 20:22 |
slangasek | there are no edge channel builds currently; those will happen when automation is completed | 20:22 |
ogra_ | ah, k | 20:23 |
ogra_ | i dont really care about stable :) | 20:23 |
slangasek | I... have no idea what has been done here | 20:23 |
ogra_ | (apart from release day) | 20:23 |
slangasek | oh I see, stable was a symlink and I though it was a directory. fixing. | 20:23 |
ogra_ | well, all the dirs miss the hataccess in fact | 20:23 |
ogra_ | *htaccess | 20:23 |
infinity | I prefer hat access. | 20:24 |
ogra_ | heh :) | 20:24 |
slangasek | ogra_: 'current' is missing .htaccess because /that/ one was done by hand, back in November | 20:24 |
slangasek | 'pending' has it | 20:24 |
ogra_ | well, looks all better now | 20:25 |
ogra_ | thx | 20:26 |
acheronuk | Could someone please take a look at the new sources in the queue for KDE applications 16.12.1? thanks | 20:33 |
acheronuk | can someone please also accept gpgme binaries please? these are now required for new KDE frameworks and applications, and without them we are sort of stuck! | 21:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!