[06:46] bluesabre: what do we want to to about reporting gtk3 xfce setting issues? [07:04] flocculant: imo those should be reported on bugs.xfce.org as this work has been merged already to the master branch [07:04] plus it has been released as 4.13.0 [07:04] so if bluesabre was a good boy, he added the version already to buzgilla [07:04] ochosi: ok - not bother reporting to lp? [07:04] imo one tracker is enough [07:05] ok - I'll go with that for the moment and wait for you and bluesabre to either have the same pov or discuss it :p [07:06] ochosi: one of the things I found is mouse scrolling : [07:06] ) [07:07] in something new - but same as notify [07:07] ah [07:07] right, good to know if it's not just notifyd [07:07] then it's most likely settings' bug [07:07] so i added the 4.13.0 version tag to bugzilla [07:07] yea that was what I thought - hence mentioning it to you :) [07:07] feel free to start reporting those bugs [07:08] ochosi: ok - cheers [07:08] btw, i also have a new taskman release pending [07:08] added a small feature and fixed some bugs [07:08] if you wanna take it for a spin [07:08] yea saw the mention of it earlier [07:08] yup can do :) [07:09] basically this means building the master branch [07:09] same routine as with notifyd [07:09] right - sounds like I might want to do that in a vm first :p [07:10] first install the build-deps (apt-get build-dep xfce4-taskmanager), then after cloning run ./autogen.sh && make && ./src/xfce4-taskmanager to execute without install (which is unproblematic, apart from a missing icon) [07:10] sure, in a vm you can install it with sudo make install in the end [07:10] which makes the missing icon thing also go away [07:11] this is what to expect: http://i.imgur.com/aq3ht6j.png [07:11] so there's the new crosshair button in the toolbar [07:11] (between settings and about) [07:11] that one you can take for a spin [07:11] the fixed bugs you probably won't notice, because we don't ship the gtk3 version of taskman atm [07:12] Do in PPA. [07:13] ochosi: ^^ is what I have locally [07:13] ochosi: and where do I clone it from :) [07:16] distcheck it, I'll package it. Also: echo $(date -u +"%Y%m%d" -d @`git log --format="%ct" -n1`).$(git rev-parse --short HEAD) [07:22] \o/ oem install works now [07:22] Unit193: that's just voodoo ... [07:31] on the other hand encrypt/lvm doesn't ... [07:36] ochosi: finding more mouse scrolling - I'll write a list before posting the bug [07:42] lvm didn't like a 12g drive [07:52] flocculant: from here: https://git.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-taskmanager/ [07:52] Unit193: i'll try to do a release shortly, then you can package something for realz [07:52] ;) [07:52] ochosi: ta - thought so [07:58] bbl [08:22] ochosi: I can see the cross-hair being a useful thing for people [11:06] ochosi, not an admin on xfce4-settings in bugzilla [11:18] morning all - had ubiquity/os-prober been updated.. got a possible problem on todays i386 iso.. its not detecting the existing installation of Xubuntu [11:18] has* [11:54] akxwi-dave: yea - reported and being worked on [11:55] ahhhh.. good couldn't find a bug report.. and morning flocculant [11:55] some idiot was mucking about with dupes and stuff overnight [11:56] eg unmarking the dupe and duping mine - even though my one is the one with detail :D [11:56] ahhhh.. lol same with one I did a while back... wasn't anyone we know was it.. ;-) [11:57] nope [11:58] someone hardly anyone would know about instead :p [12:01] akxwi-dave: not sure if you saw backlog from this morning - but checked oem \o/ and encrypt /0\ [12:02] yup saw that. :-) [13:24] ochosi: what if there is a usability issue with the current settings which is replicated in the gtk3 one? [13:25] I'm thinking of reporting more than 1 bug so different issues don't get lost in the mix [13:28] that is keeping regressions in a bug, odd things in a seperate bug [13:48] well that's the version tag in bugzilla that you'll have to use [13:48] not sure whether it allows for multi-select of versions [13:48] probably not [13:49] since 4.12 will likely not see another maintenance release (unless 4.14 takes forever) i would report it against the new version primarily [13:49] and then mention that it predates 4.13 [13:57] ok [13:57] but that's not the actual question I have :) [13:58] the question I have is 'Shall I keep things that are definitely wrong on a seperate bug from those which are 'that's odd' ones? [14:05] * flocculant joined xfce-dev [15:06] ochosi: reported 13316,7 and 8 to bugzilla === Justanick1 is now known as Justanick