/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/02/#ubuntu-devel.txt

foliThe Canonical data centre firewall maintenance is done now.00:09
sarnoldthanks foli :)00:10
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Yakkety Yak (16.10) Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-yakkety | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots:
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
pittixnox, stgraber, barry: a bit complicated -- we must use lxd for armhf as we run them on arm64 cloud instances and need the "remote" feature; and s390x isn't in scalingstack yet, so we only have that old setup06:13
pittibut there is no principal reason why s390x couldn't move to lxd06:13
pitti(i. e. that's just historical)06:13
wgrantpitti: You could also use actual armhf nova instances, though it's not quite as simple.06:16
pittiwgrant: I played around with direct kernel boot some time ago, but back then there were still some bugs/config issues that broke that07:06
pittiif it works now, that'd be nice of course, we could run kernel tests07:07
pittibut anyway, s390x was promised to get into scalingstack, so I never bothered to move them to lxd07:07
wgrantpitti: Yep, it's happening Soon™.07:12
rbasakmapreri: I know you're waiting on inkscape PPU. Is there anything else for you still pending?07:28
rbasakI have an action "rbasak to get mapreri's PPU additions done by the TB" but the TB has already done sbuilder and libreoffice-dictinataries I see. I'm not sure if there's anything else.07:29
=== JanC is now known as Guest98802
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
maprerirbasak: No other requests pending, thanks.  (OTOH I wonder whether, given the apparent complexity of getting such rights I should ask also for the other 2 packages that I maintain which are in main, "just because" and without any particular need)08:19
rbasakmapreri: now that I understand it takes only one DMB member, it's one DMB approval and one TB action. We're also working on smoothing the DMB request -> TB process.08:22
mapreriThat's my perception now too.08:22
tsdgeossil2100: can you click https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=zesty&arch=i386&package=unity8&trigger=unity8%2F8.15%2B17.04.20170131.1-0ubuntu1 (unity8 rebuild) for us?08:24
sil2100tsdgeos: sure08:24
tsdgeossil2100: appreciated :)08:24
maprerirbasak: btw, "Is the DMB asking for too much from applicants before granting core dev and/or MOTU?" => No, the requests are just fine, don't reduce them.08:25
tsdgeosgot bunch of flacky tests08:25
mapreri(imho)08:25
mapreriThat just a so weird corner case.08:25
sil2100Test request submitted. <- yw ;)08:25
tsdgeosrbasak: not sure if totally related to your case or not, but it's also a bit "weird" that I as an employee unity8 developer can submit unity8 in bileto to land and it will land, but if like now a flacky test fails, i can't press the "retry" button08:26
mapreritsdgeos: Isn't that a case already covered by PPU?08:27
mapreriIs just that you're not going to upload directly to the archive because you have your own "deployment" pipeline08:28
rbasaktsdgeos: that's solely an ACL issue I think. Technical, not organisational.08:29
rbasaktsdgeos: perhaps bileto should grow a feature to allow you to do that.08:29
tsdgeosmapreri: maybe, if i knew what PPU means :D08:29
tsdgeosrbasak: that makes some sense i guess08:30
mapreritsdgeos: => that's probably a sign that you shouldn't apply for that then :) - (and instead autopkgtests/bileto grow something)08:31
tsdgeosi'll try to talk to robru08:31
mapreritsdgeos: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Per-package_Uploaders08:31
mapreri(FYI)08:31
tsdgeosmapreri: tx, i tried googleing for it and only could find people's wiki/applications for it08:31
rbasakstgraber: thank you!09:02
rbasakmapreri: you should be done.09:02
mapreri\o/09:06
maprerirbasak: thank you!09:06
maprerirbasak: FYI, I'm subscribed to the tech board ML.09:07
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson
Mirvxnox: umbrello against s390x seems to be in infinite loop http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-umbrello eg against my qtbase-opensource-src-gles/5.7.1+dfsg-2ubuntu3~2 it has started over numerous time without anyone specifically triggering it. so it's always left at "Test in progress" http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src-gles11:34
MirvI've seen the Running for time being reset today least three times11:35
xnoxMirv, fun. However I don't have access to the infra. Try Laney and/or barry11:35
Mirvxnox: thanks for highlighting.11:36
xnoxno problem.11:36
Laneymmm11:39
Laney<VirtSubproc>: failure: (down) ['cp', '-r', '--preserve=timestamps,links', '/data/adttmp/autopkgtest-virt-lxc.shared.2l76ah7r/downtmp/umbrello-16.12.1', '/data/adttmp/autopkgtest-virt-lxc.shared.2l76ah7r/downtmp/build.8Xe/umbrello-16.12.1'] failed (exit status 1, stderr "cp: error writing '/data/adttmp/autopkgtest-virt-lxc.shared.2l76ah7r/downtmp/build.8Xe/umbrello-16.12.1/obj-s390x-linux-gnu/unittests/testpythonwriter': Cannot allocate memory\n")11:43
=== _salem is now known as salem_
LaneyFeb 02 00:41:08 aupkg01 kernel: cp invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x24000c0, order=0, oom_score_adj=012:17
Laneywtf12:17
pittiLaney: must be a helluva file :)12:39
Laneypitti: it passed before a few times http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/umbrello/zesty/s390x12:41
Laney:(12:41
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes
zuldoko: ping python-murano-pkg-check?13:55
=== ara_ is now known as ara
=== ara is now known as Guest84900
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson
ricotz_why is 15.04/Vivid still marked as support on launchpad?14:32
mdeslaurricotz_: it's used by the phone, if we deactivate it on launchpad we can't build packages for the phone anymore14:34
ricotz_mdeslaur, I see, quite a weird situation then14:35
mdeslaurricotz_: yes, launchpad needs to be fixed to be able to mark a release as unsupported without deactivating it14:35
mdeslaurricotz_: but this was only supposed to be temporary14:36
ricotz_mdeslaur, ok, but one should not be able to build things for it in random ppas/recipes14:37
=== vishnu is now known as vrmaroli
cjwatsonWe don't really mind hugely if people can.14:38
jgrimmrbasak, thanks for pointing out test log history, indeed dogtag-pki has been failing for long time, unrelated to merge. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dogtag-pki/zesty/amd6416:15
naccjgrimm: right it's realted to tomcat, iirc16:17
naccjgrimm: and 'known'16:17
nacctjaalton: --^ iirc was looking at it16:18
greybackHi folks, migration of https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2404 from proposed failed again, we've a single flaky test on i386. It's something we've struggled to fix, as we can't reproduce it anywhere except on britney16:19
jgrimmnacc, cool thanks.. context was that it showed up in the list of regressions on latest nspr upload16:19
jgrimmnacc, good to know what its actually attributed to tho!16:19
naccjgrimm: right, probably unrelated16:20
jgrimmthanks sir16:20
barrydoko, caribou o/16:28
cariboubarry: doko: o/16:29
cariboubarry: doko: to summarize, trusty & xenial builds using the release's gcc don't show any sensible differences16:29
caribou(trusty & xenial builds in a schroot using the release's gcc)16:30
barrycaribou: that's very interesting, and mostly what i'd expected.  i just couldn't find any upstream python change that could have affected performance (but there are a lot of changes between .6 and .12)16:30
caribouI'm now re-running the initial tests (i.e. using the latest gcc in trusty/xenial) to verify the previous round of tests16:30
cariboudoko: the only compiler difference I noticed b/w trusty's 4.8 and xenial's 5.3 is the addition of -fstack-protector-strong in Xenial16:32
caribouand -Wdate-time but that shouldn't matter16:32
dokocaribou: what is "release's gcc"?16:32
cariboudoko: the one in trusty/main (not the one in -updates or -security)16:32
dokota16:32
cariboudoko: barry:  I'll let you know once I get the new set of results (most probably tomorrow)16:38
barrycaribou: cool.16:38
LaneyMirv: xnox: I reverse engineered pitti and now umbrello passes :-)16:40
xnoxLaney, can you clone or fork pitti too?16:40
LaneyI think only his wife has that CAP16:41
xnoxlatency is too large on that CAP16:42
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
tjaaltonjgrimm, nacc: yes, tomcat 8.5 broke dogtag, and is blocking a lot of updates. 8.5 should be removed from proposed and blocked for now17:17
nacctjaalton: i assume we need an AA to do that?17:18
tjaaltonyep17:19
jgrimmtjaalton, thank you!17:31
=== ricotz_ is now known as ricotz
GunnarHjbdmurray: Thanks for approving my yakkety upload at bug #1655036! Any chance you have a couple of minutes to sponsor the xenial debdiff at that bug? xenial is more important, and I don't have the permission yet.18:30
ubottubug 1655036 in im-config (Ubuntu Xenial) "HIME rc doesn't assign QT_IM_MODULE, breaks usage in Qt5 application" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165503618:30
GunnarHjhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2017-January/001014.html18:30
bdmurrayGunnarHj: I left the tab open and will try and do it today18:32
GunnarHjbdmurray: Thanks, crossing my fingers. :)18:33
=== ahoneybun is now known as ahoneybun_

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!