=== JanC is now known as Guest98802 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
jjohansen | cking: so there is a fix for the regression posted to the ml, and I have debs in the dir mentioned in the bug | 09:28 |
---|---|---|
cking | jjohansen, thanks, I'm just working on giving it a test. Thanks for sorting this out so quickly. Much appreciated | 09:28 |
jjohansen | heh, its not just you who needed it, its been causing problems for snappy | 09:29 |
jjohansen | oops :) | 09:29 |
cking | oh fun. | 09:29 |
jjohansen | yeah, but it showed up in a way we were thinking it was not a regression but showing up a new bug, ... | 09:30 |
cking | jjohansen, it passes the tests, thanks, I've acked the patch | 10:08 |
zyga | rtg: I think I just sent that first patch to the mailing list as you instructed | 13:22 |
rtg | zyga, I just unmoderated it | 13:23 |
zyga | rtg: not sure if I did things correctly | 13:23 |
zyga | rtg: thank you for helping me out | 13:23 |
rtg | zyga, it needs a Buglink, or at least an indication of what kernel to which it applies. | 13:24 |
zyga | rtg: what is the usual way to specify that? | 13:24 |
zyga | rtg: it is just an idea, this is not fixing a bug (more like adding a feature and asking for RFC) | 13:24 |
rtg | zyga, sforshee is our namespace expert. He is the one that should review the patch, and then maybe you could submit it uptream. He'll know to whom it should be sent. | 13:26 |
zyga | rtg: how should I ask sforshee for a review? just on irc here? | 13:26 |
rtg | zyga, he'll notice in a bit when he comes online | 13:27 |
zyga | rtg: I see, thanks | 13:27 |
sforshee | zyga: I'm online already. I just looked at the patch briefly - that's userspace visible, so usually I'd expect that to go upstream first | 13:31 |
zyga | sforshee: I'm not a kernel developer so I'm not familiar with the process, I chose to send it here to get feedback and discuss in a friendlier place than LKML | 13:32 |
zyga | sforshee: it's not a patch that should be applied yet | 13:32 |
zyga | sforshee: I'm working on an userspace problem that got somewhat stuck on being able to reliably detect that a given bind mount is already mounted | 13:33 |
sforshee | zyga: I want to look at it some more before I decide what I think about it, but I need to step away for ~30 min. I'll reply on the list later. | 13:34 |
zyga | sforshee: thank you | 13:34 |
=== ara_ is now known as ara | ||
=== ara is now known as Guest84900 | ||
jdstrand | rtg: hi! I noticed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/4.9.0-16.17 ftbfs. not sure if that was on your radar | 16:49 |
rtg | jdstrand, yeah, sometimes it takes awhile for the signed image to get sorted out. | 16:51 |
rtg | it is going to be superseded by 4.10 soon anyways | 16:51 |
jdstrand | I see | 16:52 |
jdstrand | rtg: ok, thanks! | 16:52 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
=== ricotz_ is now known as ricotz | ||
zyga | sforshee: I replied to your reply, I think I understand the problem better now and that my patch can be discarded | 17:48 |
zyga | sforshee: if you don't find any holes in my understanding of the topic and the reasoning I presented in the mail I think I can do everything I needed with an unmodified kernel | 17:49 |
zyga | jdstrand: enjoy your time off :) | 17:59 |
jdstrand | zyga: thanks! :) | 18:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!