=== JanC is now known as Guest98802 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [09:28] cking: so there is a fix for the regression posted to the ml, and I have debs in the dir mentioned in the bug [09:28] jjohansen, thanks, I'm just working on giving it a test. Thanks for sorting this out so quickly. Much appreciated [09:29] heh, its not just you who needed it, its been causing problems for snappy [09:29] oops :) [09:29] oh fun. [09:30] yeah, but it showed up in a way we were thinking it was not a regression but showing up a new bug, ... [10:08] jjohansen, it passes the tests, thanks, I've acked the patch [13:22] rtg: I think I just sent that first patch to the mailing list as you instructed [13:23] zyga, I just unmoderated it [13:23] rtg: not sure if I did things correctly [13:23] rtg: thank you for helping me out [13:24] zyga, it needs a Buglink, or at least an indication of what kernel to which it applies. [13:24] rtg: what is the usual way to specify that? [13:24] rtg: it is just an idea, this is not fixing a bug (more like adding a feature and asking for RFC) [13:26] zyga, sforshee is our namespace expert. He is the one that should review the patch, and then maybe you could submit it uptream. He'll know to whom it should be sent. [13:26] rtg: how should I ask sforshee for a review? just on irc here? [13:27] zyga, he'll notice in a bit when he comes online [13:27] rtg: I see, thanks [13:31] zyga: I'm online already. I just looked at the patch briefly - that's userspace visible, so usually I'd expect that to go upstream first [13:32] sforshee: I'm not a kernel developer so I'm not familiar with the process, I chose to send it here to get feedback and discuss in a friendlier place than LKML [13:32] sforshee: it's not a patch that should be applied yet [13:33] sforshee: I'm working on an userspace problem that got somewhat stuck on being able to reliably detect that a given bind mount is already mounted [13:34] zyga: I want to look at it some more before I decide what I think about it, but I need to step away for ~30 min. I'll reply on the list later. [13:34] sforshee: thank you === ara_ is now known as ara === ara is now known as Guest84900 [16:49] rtg: hi! I noticed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/4.9.0-16.17 ftbfs. not sure if that was on your radar [16:51] jdstrand, yeah, sometimes it takes awhile for the signed image to get sorted out. [16:51] it is going to be superseded by 4.10 soon anyways [16:52] I see [16:52] rtg: ok, thanks! === JanC_ is now known as JanC === ricotz_ is now known as ricotz [17:48] sforshee: I replied to your reply, I think I understand the problem better now and that my patch can be discarded [17:49] sforshee: if you don't find any holes in my understanding of the topic and the reasoning I presented in the mail I think I can do everything I needed with an unmodified kernel [17:59] jdstrand: enjoy your time off :) [18:26] zyga: thanks! :)