/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/03/#ubuntu-discuss.txt

lotuspsychjegood morning to all05:34
lotuspsychjebig xenial update this morning05:42
lotuspsychje!info linux-image-generic xenial05:42
ubot5linux-image-generic (source: linux-meta): Generic Linux kernel image. In component main, is optional. Version 4.4.0.62.65 (xenial), package size 2 kB, installed size 12 kB05:42
Bashing-omlotuspsychje: Lemme ckeck again . when I fired up here this AM was not in my mirror yet .05:43
lotuspsychje.83 should be out05:44
Bashing-omlotuspsychje: " 26 packages can be upgraded." . since this AM .05:44
lotuspsychje: )05:45
Bashing-omOK all done .. less the reboot to come up on the -62 kernel :)05:48
lotuspsychjequicker then a win machine05:50
Bashing-omlotuspsychje: appstream however continues to be held . I wait some more and see if it is "phased" in .05:50
lotuspsychjegot issues with it?05:51
lotuspsychje!info appstream05:51
ubot5appstream (source: appstream): Software component index. In component main, is optional. Version 0.9.4-1ubuntu2 (xenial), package size 30 kB, installed size 176 kB05:51
Bashing-omappstream/xenial-backports 0.10.6-1~ubuntu16.04.1 amd64 [upgradable from: 0.10.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]05:56
Bashing-omlotuspsychje: nope .. just curious to see if/when it work out ,,if I get impatient will 'full-upgrade' . I expect will pull it in .05:58
lotuspsychjekk05:59
Bashing-om!info appstrean xenial-updates05:59
ubot5'xenial-updates' is not a valid distribution: kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, partner, precise, precise-backports, precise-proposed, stable, testing, trusty, trusty-backports, trusty-proposed, unstable, utopic, utopic-backports, utopic-proposed, vivid, vivid-backports, vivid-proposed, wily, wily-backports, wily-proposed, xenial, xenial-backports, xenial-proposed, yakkety, yakkety-backports, yakkety-proposed, zesty, zesty-bac05:59
Bashing-om!info appstrean xenial-backports06:01
ubot5Package appstrean does not exist in xenial-backports06:01
Bashing-om!info appstrean xenial-proposed06:01
ubot5Package appstrean does not exist in xenial-proposed06:01
Bashing-omwell !!06:02
Bashing-om"ii  appstream      0.10.1-1~ubu amd64 " !06:03
lotuspsychjeaha06:03
lotuspsychjewould be cool to have a bot that shows features of a new package :p06:06
lotuspsychjeor bugfixes06:07
lotuspsychje!info linux-image-generic xenial06:11
ubot5linux-image-generic (source: linux-meta): Generic Linux kernel image. In component main, is optional. Version 4.4.0.62.65 (xenial), package size 2 kB, installed size 12 kB06:11
lotuspsychjeneed some to time to refresh06:11
=== lordievader is now known as Guest16923
=== Guest16923 is now known as lordievader
Bashing-omno do no more - this session . laters07:38
lotuspsychjebbl city walk :p09:29
lotuspsychjehttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/02/dirt-rally-linux-feral-interactive11:35
ducasselotuspsychje: \o :)11:40
lotuspsychjehowdy ducasse we finally meet normally :p11:40
ducasselotuspsychje: i've only been on irc now and then lately, needed a break :)11:41
lotuspsychjeoh sure, everyone needs a break at any point11:42
BluesKajHi folks11:58
lotuspsychjehey BluesKaj11:58
ducasse\o BluesKaj11:59
BluesKajhi lotuspsychje, ducasse11:59
BluesKajkernel upgrade reboot  was required12:18
lotuspsychjeyep .8312:18
lotuspsychjegot big one this morning12:19
lotuspsychjewe had some arguments in main this morning, wether servers needed reboots or not12:20
BluesKaj4.8.0-37-generic on 16.1012:22
lotuspsychjeoh12:22
lotuspsychjebbl coffee12:27
=== lordievader is now known as Guest64938
=== Guest64938 is now known as lordievader
BluesKajHi pauljw13:07
BluesKajwb lordievader13:08
pauljwhi BluesKaj :)13:08
pauljweveryone13:08
lordievaderThanks BluesKaj13:34
lordievaderAnyone here with experience regarding Western Digital RMA's?13:38
lordievaderGot a dying drive, checked the warrenty today, still has warrenty ;)13:39
ducasselordievader: i've had no problems with it, but that probably depends on where you are - i'm in norway.13:47
lordievaderHolland here, guess I'll see how far I get with it next week.13:49
ducassewhen i've returned disks it has usually been because they failed while under the normal guarantees given by law, so i've gotten replacements from where i bought them. once or twice was under wd warranty, and that just worked.13:52
lordievaderThis disk has many bad sectors.13:56
lordievader1617 reallocated with 347 pending.13:56
ducassehow old is it?13:57
lordievaderBought in 2015 or so. Bought two of the same model, the other has no issues what so ever.13:58
ducasse2015, might still be covered by law or vendor - don't know how that is in holland.14:07
lordievaderWD has a warrenty checker, and through their website you can do RMA too. Might check the place where I bought it, else I'd go directly to WD.14:08
ducasseusually faster and less trouble to go through the place you bought it, i've used mine for so long they usually don't even ask me to send them the failed one anymore :)14:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!