| === rogpeppe1 is now known as rogpeppe | ||
| deanman | frankban, Hiya, quick question regarding https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/2392. Any estimate for the patch delivery ? | 12:33 |
|---|---|---|
| frankban | deanman: hey, sorry, missed the ping, 2.3.1 is due in ~2 weeks according to our schedule | 13:33 |
| deanman | frankban, hey great news then, looking forward to see that, thanks for the update! | 15:53 |
| frankban | deanman: np, thanks for reporting! | 15:53 |
| deanman | frankban, on a side note, is there any feature request to be able to present a bundle as a single unit ? | 15:54 |
| deanman | So that you can have more complex architectures in your model without having tens of services always visible in your canvas ? | 15:55 |
| frankban | deanman: that idea is under design. yes we want bundles to be real entities in juju. right now, once a bundle is deployed, there is nothing in juju indicating that that's a bundle and not just a collection of charms in your model. for instance, you cannot scale out a bundle. I think a plan exists but not scheduled for the very near future | 15:58 |
| deanman | frankban, i think the elasticity scenario is far more advanced and would mean that bundles are treatest as first-class citizens. My request comes from the fact that i simply want a better representation in the web-gui side. | 16:00 |
| frankban | deanman: I see, interesting | 16:01 |
| deanman | I was thinking something that you could toggle on-off and either group the charms of a given bundle in a single UI element or expand them | 16:02 |
| frankban | deanman: I'll have to ask UX about this, and we'll have to think about how doable it is without some support server side | 16:02 |
| deanman | e.g. deploy two complex bundles, 1 is from the charm store and contains 20 charms and 1 bundle which is my application and is 3 charms. With this example the 20 services which I'm simply using as-a-service simply make my 3 charms "invisible" or less important. In the UX language i guess you could say it draws the focus of the end user to the wrong side | 16:04 |
| rick_h | deanman: I think the idea there would be the feature flagged idea of cross model relations. | 16:06 |
| rick_h | deanman: so you can put them in different models and connect.the bits that need to be connected | 16:06 |
| deanman | Hi rick_h, hmmmm...haven't see the cross-model feature yet, can you deploy a subordinate, e.g. a monitoring tool and connect all services ? Will that be visible in the same canvas ? | 16:09 |
| deanman | I guess if you are able to see both models at the same time that will work for what i have in mind. | 16:10 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!