=== G_ is now known as G
[08:59] <cult-> hello, i would like to raise awereness of a broken library in ubuntu repository, i contacted the maintainer in email but he hasn't responded. what should I do?
[09:05] <cult-> ubuntu-bug libodb-dev for xenial 16.04, more info: http://www.codesynthesis.com/pipermail/odb-users/2016-May/003280.html
[09:20] <cult-> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libodb/+bug/1588330
[09:20] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1588330 in libodb (Ubuntu) "Incompatible builds of libodb and libodb-mysql" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[09:41] <cult-> where can I find the build logs?
[09:41] <cult-> nevermind
[09:41] <rbasak> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libodb/2.4.0-1 -> Builds
[09:43] <cult-> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/228769724/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-s390x.libodb_2.4.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[09:43] <cult-> i can't seem to find any errors. but when i built it from source by myself, all was ok.
[09:50] <cult-> but what i see is that there's only s390x architecture available in xenial, why not amd64?
[09:50] <cult-> can it be the source of the problem?
[11:44] <Vej> How do we set the status for a bugreport, which contains the opinion, that a package should be excluded from the ubuntu installer?
[11:45] <Vej> It feels like an "Opinion", but the officiall description needs a "difference of opinion" which is not the case here.
[11:46] <rbasak> IMHO, if it's clear to developers what the request is, then Triaged.
[11:46] <rbasak> If developers disagree, they can set it to Won't Fix.
[11:47] <rbasak> If they agree, then the bug can remain open to track when it is done.
[11:47] <Vej> rbasak: Thank you. I will set to Triaged then.
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln
=== pleia2_ is now known as pleia2
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko
[15:15] <Laibsch> Just found another example in bug 1540706 of why the penalv-bot is harming the community and alienating valuable contributors.
[15:15] <ubot5> bug 1540706 in sane-backends (Ubuntu) "Canon DR-F120 - IO Errors" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1540706
[15:16] <Laibsch> I mean, you have to be insane to ask a guy who reported a valid issue, then goes ahead and fixes the issue himself, then goes ahead and pushes the patch upstream and respond by "please follow our procedure and run some silly scripts because we ALWAYS do, whether or not it makes sense".
[15:17]  * Laibsch thoroughly pissed off again
[15:51] <rbasak> I agree. It was inappropriate to mark that Incomplete. If an upstream-committed patch for the issue has been identified, the bug almost always automatically Triaged.
[15:51] <rbasak> bdmurray: ^
=== acheronuk_ is now known as acheronuk