[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cairo-5c [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted git-crecord [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [20161226.0-1]
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (trusty-proposed/main) [2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.31 => 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.32] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20161013.0.d77d6cf-0ubuntu2~xenial1 => 3.20.1+git20170208.0.a34b091-0ubuntu1~xenial1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-63.84~14.04.1]
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20161013.0.d77d6cf-0ubuntu2 => 3.20.1+git20170208.0.a34b091-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova-lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [14.1.0-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8-race-detector-runtime [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu1]
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.8-race-detector-runtime [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.8-race-detector-runtime [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu1]
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debichem [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.6] (no packageset)
[08:35] <acheronuk> apw: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/2017-February/011124.html
[08:36] <acheronuk> debian packagers also confirm that they have no intention to do anything other than we have done
[08:38] <acheronuk> apw: can please accept minuet. that it not epoched and not a split anyway
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [source] (zesty-proposed) [375.26-0ubuntu1]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [375.26-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [375.26-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [375.26-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [375.26-0ubuntu1]
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [375.26-0ubuntu1]
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [375.26-0ubuntu1]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (xenial-proposed/main) [5.3.5-1ubuntu3 => 5.3.5-1ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-server)
[10:01] <apw> acheronuk_, this minuet seems to include a sound bank which is under its own licence which is not mentioned in the debiancopyright
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfce4ui [i386] (zesty-proposed) [4.13.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:16] <rbasak> Am I still supposed to be releasing SRUs, or are we in a freeze for Xenial?
[10:16] <rbasak> apw: ?
[10:17] <rbasak> Presumably Yakkety is fine though, so I'll carry on there.
[10:22] <apw> rbasak, releasing to -updates in xenial is frozen though if they look pertinant to the release you could ask infinity ... this of course is for seeded things
[10:26] <Laney> isn't it meant to be released tomorrow?
[10:26] <rbasak> OK. Thanks!
[10:31]  * apw reviews the KDE bits in the zesty queue
[10:59] <jbicha> rbasak: please reject gnome-keyring from xenial, yakkety we discussed in #ubuntu-desktop that the current behavior is intentional
[11:06] <rbasak> jbicha: done
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-keyring [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.3-0ubuntu2.1]
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-keyring [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.0-2ubuntu4.1]
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-biomaj3 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.20-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cgcloud [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-os [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.9.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-canonicaljson [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-unpaddedbase64 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-imageio [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.1.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pybedtools [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.8-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pybedtools [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.8-1] (no packageset)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debichem [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.6]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-canonicaljson [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-biomaj3 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.20-1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cgcloud [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.6.0-1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pybedtools [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.8-1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-unpaddedbase64 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-3]
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-imageio [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.1+ds1-1]
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-os [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.6-1]
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pybedtools [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.8-1]
[12:11] <sil2100> I just took a look at the gnome-software SRU but hm, I would probably prefer someone with more experience taking a look at it - to me there seemed to be a bit too many undocumented changes, which is probably normal when there's a new snapshot release made
[12:11] <sil2100> Anyway, I'll move on to other entries on the queue
[12:13] <apw> rbasak, sil2100 i think you are both doing SRUs right now, might need to coordinate
[12:15] <sil2100> rbasak: I'm looking at the ubuntu-fan uploads right now - is that ok?
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kfilereplace [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kimagemapeditor [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kommander [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted klinkstatus [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kfind [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted konqueror [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:23] <apw> acheronuk_, as per our discussion ... ^^
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected minuet [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[12:28] <apw> clivejo acheronuk_, as per our discussion (missing licencing information) ... ^^
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:28] <sil2100> smb: hey! I commented on the SRU bug for ubuntu-fan - could you update it as per my request in the comment?
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: keditbookmarks [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdialog [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cairo-5c [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.10ubuntu1]
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: konqueror [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: konqueror [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: konqueror [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:40] <sil2100> apw: hey! Do you have a moment by any chance for a quick binNEW pre-review? Since we have this rule in Bileto that any packaging change that involves the addition of new binary packages requires an AA +1
[12:41] <sil2100> apw: oxide in Bileto is adding new packages, here's the packaging diff: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_39a8dbb93caf4ec889f8a1b7f69885db/bileto-2420/2017-02-07_10:59:27/zesty_oxide-qt_packaging_changes.diff
[12:41] <sil2100> apw: could you take a look if those look ok and give me a sign if you are +1 on adding those?
[12:41] <sil2100> I could then publish the package to zesty
[12:42]  * sil2100 AFK for a bit for lunch
[12:42] <rbasak> sil2100: yeah that's fine
[12:43] <sil2100> \o/ Ok, publishing in that case
[12:43] <sil2100> Thanks!
[12:51] <smb> sil2100, done
[12:52] <tsimonq2> Has infinity disappeared? It's Wednesday and we need stuff added to the tracker.
[12:53] <davmor2> tsimonq2: He is in America dude just ask him later :)
[12:54] <tsimonq2> davmor2: But I'm in America too and I have school all day.
[12:54] <tsimonq2> *shrug*
[12:54] <tsimonq2> It's almost 7 AM and I need to go to school until 3 PM :P
[12:55] <davmor2> tsimonq2: just leave a message for him
[12:55] <tsimonq2> davmor2: That's what I just did. :)
[12:55] <davmor2> tsimonq2: you didn't say what you needed adding ;)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.32]
[12:58] <apw> sil2100, oh you got what you wanted, ok
[13:12] <clivejo> apw: regarding copyright file, that was generated from the KDE copyright statements.  https://cgit.kde.org/minuet.git/tree/COPYING.DOC and https://cgit.kde.org/minuet.git/tree/COPYING
[13:13] <clivejo> and is actually a merge from debian
[13:15] <clivejo> see - https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-kde/applications/minuet.git/tree/debian/copyright
[13:16] <clivejo> apw: ^
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-gffutils [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[13:29] <tsimonq2> davmor2: cc infinity 16.04.2 to iso.qa.ubuntu.com
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted keditbookmarks [i386] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdialog [i386] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-gffutils [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.7.1-1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted konqueror [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted konqueror [i386] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted konqueror [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ciphersaber [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.01-2ubuntu1]
[13:49] <mapreri> src:file is not migrating due to autpkgtest for lintian failing; that was fixed in the new version of lintian already in release, why isn't it trying it?
[13:49] <apw> mapreri, perhaps it was run before that hit ?
[13:49] <mapreri> apw: -eparse
[13:50] <apw> either the issue remains regardless of the updated lintian, or the test ran before lintian was fixed ?
[13:51] <mapreri> apw: Yes, it ran the test against unfixed lintian.
[13:51] <mapreri> apw: now it should be tried again against the new lintian; doesn't that happen automatically?
[13:51]  * apw hits the retry button
[13:52] <apw> mapreri, it would not happen automatically no
[13:52] <mapreri> Oh, I see.
[13:52] <mapreri> Then next time I'll just either hit the retry button myself, or nag a core-dev like in this case :)
[13:52] <mapreri> Thanks!
[13:52] <apw> asking here is fine
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-os-brick [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.0-2ubuntu0.2]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-os-brick [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1.1]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ricochet [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4+nmu1] (no packageset)
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.0~rc.4ubuntu62.2]
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: minuet (zesty-proposed/primary) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ricochet [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.4+nmu1]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: minuet [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [i386] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted minuet [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:36] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I see you seem to be on SRU duty - on the example of bug 1621340 I wanted to clarify - is that version number now burnt or not (stopped at unapproved queue)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (xenial-proposed/main) [3.18.9-1ubuntu3.1 => 3.18.9-1ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:39] <rbasak> cpaelzer: not burnt. Nothing in the unapproved queue counts for anything like that. But no need to reroll - I just want the answer to help me review the patch.
[15:39] <rbasak> In the bug is fine.
[15:39] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I added the info there
[15:39] <rbasak> Thanks!
[15:39] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but you likely have seen it
[15:40] <cpaelzer> already
[15:40] <rbasak> Oh, sorry.
[15:40] <rbasak> I see it in comment 9. I missed that before.
[15:41] <cpaelzer> I asked for that as well in the past - which is why I was sure it is in there, I just missed that it did not get to the dep3 header
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-libav1.0 (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-1ubuntu0.1 => 1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2] (kubuntu)
[15:55] <Laney> ^- regression-update fix
[15:58] <camako> A question for the CI experts : if a silo has already failed in one arch and you know you need to rebuild, do you need to wait until all other archs are done building or can you start a new build without confusing the silo?
[16:01] <Laney> camako: That's fine; the test runs know what they were triggered for
[16:03] <camako> Laney, thanks.. Just to confirm, I can start a build from bileto while a previous build hasn't completed?
[16:05] <Laney> camako: Sure
[16:05] <Laney> If you have tha PPA link then I can cancel the old ones though, to free up the builder
[16:07] <camako> Laney, here's the PPA link : https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2435/+packages
[16:07] <camako> thank you
[16:08] <Laney> ah, they're pretty much done
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-fan [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.12.0.1]
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-fan [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.9.2]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-81.89] (core, kernel)
[17:30] <flocculant> tsimonq2: if a milestone is just a fixed daily - then nothing to stop you reporting against the daily
[17:38] <tsimonq2> flocculant: Hm k
[17:39] <flocculant> just a bit of common sense - unless there is going to be some difference between what's available now and tomorrow *shrug*
[17:39] <infinity> There will be, sadly.
[17:40] <infinity> tsimonq2: Things are a tiny bit behind.  Working today on unbehinding.
[17:41] <tsimonq2> infinity: Thanks. :)
[17:41] <tsimonq2> infinity: But are we still looking to release tomorrow? :O
[17:42] <tsimonq2> (asking so I can update testers)
[17:43] <infinity> tsimonq2: I think it's possible that if everything lands today, we could release late tomorrow, like Hawaii time.
[17:43] <infinity> tsimonq2: But we'll have to see how today goes, I guess.
[17:43] <flocculant> infinity: won't get anymore than smoketests from us btw
[17:44] <infinity> Smoke is really what we're looking for.
[17:44] <tsimonq2> infinity: Ok, please keep me updated, I love lots of pings. :P
[17:44] <infinity> All the SRUs in question should have been individually tested anyway, so point release ISO testing is a question of boot/install/reboot, and make sure nothing looked broken in those steps.
[17:44] <flocculant> infinity: heh - we have a specual producing smoke team :)
[17:45] <flocculant> yea - understand that
[17:46] <tsimonq2> infinity: After becoming Lubuntu RM I want to be extra careful, I'll be without training wheels.
[17:46] <tsimonq2> Plus I seriously love lots of pings.
[17:56] <tsimonq2> Ok, I'll be back later, thanks for the ping infinity.
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (xenial-proposed) [9.4ubuntu4.4]
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.8.5-1ubuntu1 => 1.8.5-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.9.20-1ubuntu1 => 1.9.20-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine1.6 (xenial-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.2-0ubuntu14 => 1:1.6.2-0ubuntu14.1] (no packageset)
[21:37] <fossfreedom> cyphermox: thanks for pulling in our (Ubuntu Budgie) PR for ubiquity.  Query though - I note you've made a tweak to our PR and now budgie-wm doesnt fallthrough and use gnome-settings daemon. Does the settings daemon control window theming?  if so - it will explain why ubiquity is unthemed http://pix.toile-libre.org/upload/original/1486589735.png
[21:38] <cyphermox> that's not unthemed.
[21:38] <cyphermox> maybe not the right stuff but it really looks like there are colors and etc.
[21:40] <jbicha> fossfreedom: that looks like gtk3's default Adwaita theme
[21:40] <cyphermox> fossfreedom: what I did is functionally equivalent to the code you had, unless there's something I'm not seeing?
[21:43] <fossfreedom> jbicha: k - thanks.  hmm - maybe I should have explicitly set arc-theme then :(
[21:44] <fossfreedom> jbicha: GSD controls the mouse cursor that is displayed though - doesnt it?
[21:47] <jbicha> I don't know, there's a gsettings org.gnome.desktop.interface cursor-theme
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr437-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.1.0~bzr460-0ubuntu1~16.04.1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.9.6-1 => 1.9.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:18] <fossfreedom> cyphermox: as mentioned in our privmsg - I've proposed this patch for ubiquity to ensure budgie-wm (the window manager) used gnome-settings-daemon https://code.launchpad.net/~fossfreedom/ubiquity/use_gsd_for_budgie/+merge/316787