| mskalka | Anyone have advice for passing json or json like objects into charm actions as params? | 00:53 |
|---|---|---|
| pranav_ | Hi Folks. How do I install charms specific to Openstack Ocata release? | 05:58 |
| pranav_ | The current charms are for mitaka release | 05:59 |
| === Lukewh_ is now known as Lukewh | ||
| === wolsen_ is now known as wolsen | ||
| === skayskayskay_ is now known as skayskayskay | ||
| === mpontillo_ is now known as mpontillo | ||
| === thomi_ is now known as thomi | ||
| viswesn | I created a new dummy-subordinate charm for dummy-sink charm | 06:49 |
| viswesn | and I am seeing the message status as " Waiting for token" for dummy-sink on running "juju add-relation dummy-sink dummy-subordinate" | 06:49 |
| viswesn | Is there anything that I need to do to make sure that dummy-sink is "Started" | 06:50 |
| === Dmitrii-Sh_ is now known as Dmitrii-Sh | ||
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| kjackal | Good morning Juju world | 08:06 |
| kjackal | Hi viswesn I guess you are seing the msg from here: https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/~juju-qa/xenial/dummy-sink-0/archive/hooks/source-relation-changed | 08:10 |
| viswesn | @kjackal - It is resolved now :) | 08:10 |
| kjackal | ah great! | 08:10 |
| viswesn | Thanks kjackal | 08:11 |
| zeestrat | pranav_: I'm pretty sure Ocata charms are still in their "next" channel in https://jujucharms.com/u/openstack-charmers-next/. See also this proposal for a new bundle for Ocata here: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/openstack-bundles/pull/17. | 08:41 |
| zeestrat | pranav_: But please check with the guys in #openstack-charms to make sure. | 08:41 |
| Zic | hi Juju World | 09:05 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| kklimonda | hi guys, are charms compatible with both juju 1.25 and 2.0? | 11:19 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| admcleod_ | kklimonda: they should be | 12:29 |
| === admcleod_ is now known as admcleod | ||
| narindergupta | morning | 13:45 |
| marcoceppi | stokachu: sos, conjure-up won't let me configure clouds with latest classic snap from beta channel | 15:30 |
| marcoceppi | it only ever gives me localhost and not my existing maas | 15:31 |
| marcoceppi | stokachu: it's also stacktracing if I try localhost | 15:31 |
| === verterok` is now known as verterok | ||
| === skayskayskay is now known as skayskay | ||
| fs | هستی؟ | 17:16 |
| ir | آره | 17:16 |
| fs | این لیستی که این یغل هست همه آدمن؟ | 17:17 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi - were you trying this with the openstack-novalxd spell? that is restricted to only running on localhost intentionally. I can see how that'd be confusing, since there isn't good feedback on that in the UI currently. I've filed https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/issues/666 to track improving that. | 17:48 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi - were you trying this with the openstack-novalxd spell? that is restricted to only running on localhost intentionally. I can see how that'd be confusing, since there isn't good feedback on that in the UI currently. I've filed https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/issues/666 to track improving that. | 17:50 |
| mmcc | sorry if I just posted that 3 times, having irc bouncer issues | 17:50 |
| vila | mmcc: and a devilish issue number, don't search further ;-) | 18:17 |
| mmcc | vila :) | 18:18 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: it also failed on localhost | 18:48 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: but why limit it to localhost? It should work fine on maas? | 18:48 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi: it's targeted at deploying into LXD containers. if you deployed that bundle on maas, you'd use ~13 full machines | 18:49 |
| mmcc | the intent is that if you want to deploy openstack onto maas you should use the other openstack spell | 18:49 |
| mmcc | which crams those services into ~4 machines IIRC | 18:50 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: there is no nova-lxd spell though | 18:50 |
| marcoceppi | other than localhost | 18:50 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: seems the spell should choose a different bundle based on cloud selected | 18:51 |
| marcoceppi | I want OpenStack NovaLXD, I don't care about the nuainces between maas or lxd | 18:51 |
| stormmore | is it possible to have different models on a controller to be different clouds? e.g. local and maas? | 18:51 |
| marcoceppi | I also don't see why four lxd machines with more lxd machines inside that is a bad thing, lxd supports fully nested machines | 18:51 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi: it's not nested. there are no placement directives in the bundle | 18:52 |
| marcoceppi | stormmore: technically, yes, however those models would both need to have networking between them | 18:52 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: I'm saying you could do nested still, instead of an exploded 13 machine lxd bundle | 18:52 |
| marcoceppi | stormmore: we see people do this a lot with regional models, I don't think we support cross cloud models atm | 18:52 |
| stormmore | marcoceppi that is the plan :) I need to build a minimal offline cluster | 18:52 |
| stormmore | marcoceppi thinking about making one machine the master / client running all the "master" services including MaaS rack/region and then just have worker nodes boot to it | 18:53 |
| stormmore | potentially make it a top of rack design / data center bootstrap system too | 18:54 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi: I agree that the current spell organization for openstack isn't ideal. We'll have a discussion about how we can make it clearer and easier to deploy openstack using novalxd onto maas | 18:55 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: seems like the bundle keyword in the spell could be either a string or dictionary of cloud: bundle-url for arcitectures which diverge based on cloud backend | 18:56 |
| mmcc | fwiw, I think the way you'd do it with current spells is to pick the openstack-base spell and change the virt-type option in nova-compute to lxd | 18:57 |
| mmcc | not sure off the top of my head if that's all though | 18:57 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: you need the LXD charm as well | 18:57 |
| mmcc | ah ok | 18:57 |
| marcoceppi | mmcc: https://jujucharms.com/u/openstack-charmers-next/openstack-lxd/ | 18:57 |
| marcoceppi | though, that bundle doesn't deploy cleanly yet, if you change two (outdated) config options it will | 18:58 |
| stormmore | The only other way I was thinking which would be better in some ways it figuring out how to register the maas region/rack controller with maas and add juju controller to it too - this would be the ideal method | 18:59 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi: having a cloud: bundle mapping inside a spell isn't a bad idea. it complicates some of the other parts of spells, so there's a tradeoff. the simplest thing would be to just have additional spells and keep the 1:1 spell:bundle relationship. I'll file an issue to track discussion | 19:01 |
| stormmore | OK now I have a crazy idea forming in my head that begs to be tested | 19:04 |
| mmcc | marcoceppi: here's that issue https://github.com/conjure-up/spells/issues/46 | 19:05 |
| mmcc | thanks for the feedback! | 19:05 |
| beisner | hey marcoceppi - yeah that dev bundle isn't quite in sync with the dev charms atm. but if you have to adjust on the non-next/dev bundle, please raise that as a bug. | 19:14 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| marcoceppi | beisner: I will, it was just two config options that were no longer there, easy enough | 20:56 |
| beisner | thx marcoceppi, but if against the -next bundle, don't sweat it, we've got updates in flight for those. | 20:58 |
| marcoceppi | beisner: cheers | 20:59 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| skayskay | stub: hey, are you around? I started seeing this failure yesterday with the postgresql charm. https://paste.ubuntu.com/23963015/ | 21:59 |
| skayskay | I'm in a bootstrapped juju1 environment, and can reproduce it by running: juju deploy postgresql | 22:00 |
| skayskay | basically I think squashfuse is not in a trusty repo | 22:20 |
| infinityplusb | ahoy. If I am writing a charm, is there any way to pull a file from my host filesystem, rather than having to host it, while I am testing | 22:34 |
| infinityplusb | I am deploying using lxd | 22:34 |
| stokachu | infinityplusb, other than juju scp there isn't a way within the charm | 22:51 |
| stokachu | infinityplusb, you can use resources if you want | 22:51 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!