| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| duflu | RAOF: Can we kill max_simultaneous_outputs, or does it have a future? | 06:13 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | I believe I've already answered this :) | 06:13 |
| * duflu looks | 06:13 | |
| RAOF | It's a *shrug* | 06:13 |
| RAOF | It's information that's easy to provide, but it's not easy for a client to use. | 06:14 |
| duflu | RAOF: I mean https://code.launchpad.net/~mir-team/mir/fix-1661163/+merge/316307 | 06:14 |
| RAOF | Hm. | 06:15 |
| RAOF | The deprecation message is incorrect, but I'm not aghast at the function being deprecated. | 06:16 |
| duflu | I know, was just a suggestion | 06:16 |
| duflu | We could declare it deprecated and then decide to keep it | 06:16 |
| === om26er_ is now known as om26er | ||
| duflu | RAOF: OK then, a simpler question: Are 'cards' a dead concept? | 06:54 |
| RAOF | Yes | 06:54 |
| duflu | I thought so, but max_simultaneous_outputs depends on them | 06:54 |
| RAOF | In our current implementation, yes. | 06:54 |
| duflu | Then again, so does everything loosely | 06:54 |
| RAOF | Again, yes :) | 06:56 |
| RAOF | It's possible that cards will be exposed again in the client interface, but we've never ever exposed more than one. | 06:56 |
| RAOF | Which is why they're not useful. | 06:56 |
| RAOF | That said, prime support will suddenly mean that sometimes we *do* have more than one card. | 06:57 |
| RAOF | But the first go at that will not really expose that. | 06:57 |
| duflu | RAOF: Hmm.... seems my best option is to just improve that deprecation comment | 06:59 |
| duflu | Since the logic to implement it was deleted | 06:59 |
| RAOF | It'd be pretty easy to re-add that logic, but *shrug*. | 07:00 |
| duflu | RAOF: It was part of a larger code deletion (I just bisected it). Too hard | 07:01 |
| duflu | for now | 07:01 |
| RAOF | Oh, I mean you could easily re-add logic that would support it. | 07:02 |
| RAOF | But, again, shrug. | 07:04 |
| RAOF | Also, EOD! | 07:04 |
| duflu | Kay, bye | 07:05 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| dandrader | AlbertA, around? | 10:33 |
| dandrader | alan_g, using the new "mir_window_spec_set_cursor_name() && mir_window_apply_spec()" API doesn't trigger mir::scene::SurfaceObserver::cursor_image_set_to as the deprecated API "mir_cursor_configuration_from_name() && mir_window_configure_cursor" does | 10:35 |
| dandrader | alan_g, What should I be listenting to on the server side now? | 10:35 |
| alan_g | dandrader: I would expect that to work. Possibly a Mir bug. | 10:37 |
| dandrader | alan_g, ok, will report then | 10:38 |
| dandrader | alan_g, https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1663197 | 10:43 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1663197 in Mir "mir_window_spec_set_cursor_name() doesn't trigger mir::scene::SurfaceObserver::cursor_image_set_to" [Undecided,New] | 10:43 |
| alan_g | dandrader: ack | 10:43 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| alan_g | A question to ponder: https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/miral/miral-toolkit-dev/+merge/316827/comments/825816 | 14:33 |
| elopio | kgunn_: AlbertA: hey, can you please check for my email in your inbox? I think you are sending me to the spam :'( | 14:39 |
| AlbertA | dandrader: here.. let me check the frontend | 14:56 |
| AlbertA | elopio: oh I was just waiting for kgunn to answer sorry :) | 14:56 |
| elopio | AlbertA: he seems to be missing in action. But anyway, the ideal was to have you both to talk about the work you have been doing. | 15:07 |
| elopio | AlbertA: can you join us on Friday next week? | 15:07 |
| AlbertA | elopio: I can , I believe kgunn_ is on vacation today | 15:09 |
| kgunn_ | elopio: i'm here...busy | 15:09 |
| kgunn_ | otp | 15:09 |
| kgunn_ | ah...demos, thank you AlbertA | 15:13 |
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| dandrader | AlbertA, turns out to be a bug in miral | 15:29 |
| dandrader | AlbertA, will try out your qtubuntu branch again once the fix is available | 15:29 |
| AlbertA | dandrader: cool thanks | 15:30 |
| elopio | AlbertA: awesome! I'll send you the invite, and more details next week. | 15:33 |
| alan_g | dandrader: confirmed a Mir bug - aiming to get fix into 26.1 | 16:23 |
| dandrader | alan_g, ok | 16:23 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === JanC is now known as Guest72742 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!