| babbageclunk | axw: hold off - it turns out you can't sent ProvisioningState in the update - trying out my fix for the fix now. | 00:57 |
|---|---|---|
| axw | babbageclunk: ok | 01:09 |
| axw | let me know when | 01:09 |
| wallyworld | axw: you free to catch up now? | 01:36 |
| axw | wallyworld: sure | 01:36 |
| axw | babbageclunk: I see you pushed an update, ready for review now? | 02:22 |
| babbageclunk | axw: I think so - doing one last test now | 02:32 |
| babbageclunk | axw: (sorry, went for a run) | 02:33 |
| axw | babbageclunk: ok, I'll review optimistically | 02:33 |
| babbageclunk | axw: testing looks good | 02:37 |
| axw | babbageclunk: LGTM | 02:41 |
| babbageclunk | axw: great, thanks | 02:42 |
| axw | veebers: is http://people.canonical.com/~leecj2/perfscalemem/ from running perfscale_longrunning.py ? | 02:57 |
| * veebers looks | 02:58 | |
| veebers | axw: yes, from ages ago. (Note, the perfscale tests no longer generate standalone report html pages like the one shown here) | 02:59 |
| axw | veebers: ah right that's from october last year :) ok, thanks | 02:59 |
| axw | veebers: are the long running ones not part of normal QA? don't see it on qa.jujucharms.com/perfscale | 03:00 |
| axw | normal CI I mean... | 03:01 |
| veebers | axw: there are no long running tests that run at the moment. We should be getting something in place in the near future | 03:02 |
| veebers | the parts are largely there , just need to set things up | 03:03 |
| axw | veebers: okey dokey | 03:03 |
| * axw nods | 03:03 | |
| * menn0 is EOD | 04:36 | |
| menn0 | have a good weekend all | 04:36 |
| wallyworld | axw: oh btw, i thought i had, but i hadn't. deleting the certs in ~/.local/share/juju/lxd fixed the issue with certificate validation | 07:02 |
| axw | wallyworld: hrm. that's a bit odd. the client should upload them to LXD | 07:03 |
| wallyworld | yeah, not sure what's happening there | 07:03 |
| axw | wallyworld: will look into it next week | 07:03 |
| wallyworld | sure, it appears it's just me anyway | 07:03 |
| axw | wallyworld: may well affect anyone that removes/reinstalls LXD though | 07:04 |
| wallyworld | i'm also having weird lxd snap issue, so might be related | 07:04 |
| axw | hm, ok | 07:04 |
| wallyworld | axw: i think this explains things a bit. i juju bootstrapped and the snap lxd was used unexpectedly. http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23965584/ | 07:25 |
| wallyworld | not sure what's going on | 07:25 |
| wallyworld | the snap juju was also used unexpectedly | 07:25 |
| axw | wallyworld: juju was connecting to the wrong lxd? | 07:26 |
| wallyworld | axw: that's my guess. but i have NFI why the wrong juju binary s being run | 07:27 |
| wallyworld | which juju should indicate what binary is used right | 07:28 |
| wallyworld | doesn't seem to be for some reason | 07:28 |
| axw | wallyworld: ah, I bet the snapped lxd is being told to run on the same HTTPS port. juju will open the unix socket owned by the non-snapped lxd | 07:28 |
| wallyworld | right, but why is the snapped juju being used | 07:28 |
| axw | wallyworld: so we'll upload the cert to the non-snapped lxd, then try to connect to the snapped one? | 07:28 |
| axw | hrm, doesn't explain why it starts working after removing the certs | 07:28 |
| wallyworld | i didn't ask for it and my juju is in the path first | 07:28 |
| axw | I don't know | 07:29 |
| wallyworld | i'll remove the snap and that will "fix" it | 07:29 |
| wallyworld | i'll ask adam and nicolas for advice | 07:29 |
| wallyworld | axw: yeah, something is screwed http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23965626/ | 07:37 |
| wallyworld | awesome | 07:37 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| axw | jam: I think it might be a bit risky to land this now, but wanted to get it in front of your eyes for review: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6962 | 10:05 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| jam | axw: reviewed | 11:11 |
| axw | jam: thanks. would you like me to change `"bond-" in` to startswith? it did seem odd, but didn't seem worth changing | 11:27 |
| anastasiamac_ | axw: if it fixes refered bug, why do you think it'd be risky to land it? | 12:14 |
| axw | anastasiamac_: there was enough change that it might break something else | 12:51 |
| axw | anastasiamac_: but it's rc1 for a reason, to catch bugs | 12:52 |
| axw | so landed it | 12:52 |
| anastasiamac_ | axw: \o/ | 12:52 |
| anastasiamac_ | axw: so shall i move the bug to rc1 milestone and mark at Fix committed? | 12:52 |
| anastasiamac_ | axw: or is ther more changes anticipated? | 12:52 |
| axw | anastasiamac_: I know that it fixes the issue on rackspace, but I don't know about MAAS - and that was the reported one | 12:53 |
| axw | anastasiamac_: so without knowing that they're the root cause I can't say that it fixes the issue with any certainty | 12:53 |
| anastasiamac_ | axw: k, will keep it as is for now | 12:53 |
| * axw disappears into the night | 12:53 | |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| perrito666 | morning all | 13:01 |
| frobware | last PR for me folks - https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6963 | 13:03 |
| perrito666 | frobware: it has been a pleasure working with you man | 13:04 |
| frobware | perrito666: you too!!! | 13:04 |
| rick_h | frobware: <3 | 14:12 |
| frobware | rick_h: adios dude! | 14:15 |
| mup | Bug #1663633 opened: Juju 1.2.10: Conversation scope is missing sometimes - causes relation hook failure <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663633> | 15:30 |
| redir | adios frobware | 15:42 |
| frobware | redir: adios && take care! Hope all goes well for you over the next few months and enjoy the break before all hell breaks loose. :-D | 15:43 |
| redir | frobware: :) you too | 15:43 |
| redir | morning juju-dev | 15:44 |
| alexisb | morning redir | 16:21 |
| redir | alexisb: o/ | 16:21 |
| perrito666 | elho redir | 16:27 |
| redir | ¡Buenas! perrito666 | 16:28 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!