[13:19] Hi, this bug seems fixed in 16.04, how come it hasn't been ported to 14.04 yet? :s https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mailman/+bug/1375821 [13:19] Ubuntu bug 1375821 in ifupdown (Ubuntu Trusty) "ifupdown doesn't bring loopback to state up" [Undecided,Triaged] [17:04] Hi all, just a quick (and probably silly question) - let's say a bug is present in trusty, but it has been fixed in a later version of the package in xenial. In order to incorporate the fix in trusty should it be an SRU or a backport? [17:05] For context: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1664535 [17:05] Ubuntu bug 1664535 in procps (Ubuntu) "critical bug in top command package procps" [Undecided,Confirmed] [17:05] jbayfield: cherry-picking the fix in an SRU would be fine. [17:05] Backporting a newer version to the backports pocket is also fine in principle [17:06] I'm assuming the cherry-pick method would be the preferred one? [17:06] It is the most straightforward (if the cherry pick is straightforward). [17:06] Okay, I see. Thanks for the help. :) [17:06] You're welcome. Thank you for caring! [17:07] One other thing - said bug I linked to needs triage, haven't got permissions myself. [17:11] Going to ask another quick question while I'm here, not sure if this is the right channel or not, but I noticed for a lot of packages the latest branch that appears is vivid, yet it says "Uploaded to: Xenial" for example in some package versions. What's confusing me is what remote branch you use for this, as something like lp:ubuntu/xenial/packagename doesn't work - this is quite possibly an oversight on my part and [17:14] jbayfield: marked Triaged for Trusty. What's the status in Zesty? [17:15] jbayfield: the bzr branches are no longer maintained. [17:15] There is some git work in progress by my team, but it's not yet ready for general use. [17:18] rbasak: Bug does not occur in Zesty/Yakkety. [17:18] ie: it's already been resolved [17:18] About bzr/git: Alright, thanks for letting me know. [17:18] Fix Released for the development release then. Thanks! [17:18] No problem. === thorappan is now known as thor === thor is now known as thorappan === thorappan is now known as arjunv === arjunv is now known as th0r === th0r is now known as Guest12316 === Guest12316 is now known as thorappan === thorappan is now known as arjunv === slashd- is now known as slashd === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho