=== tgm4883_ is now known as tgm4883 === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose === heroux_ is now known as heroux === andyrock_ is now known as andyrock === zeestrat_ is now known as zeestrat === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin === ulkesh_ is now known as ulkesh === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer === jelmer is now known as Guest60625 === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === caribou_ is now known as caribou === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === _salem is now known as salem_ === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === coreycb` is now known as coreycb === JanC_ is now known as JanC === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [20:47] cjwatson_, wgrant: inkscape answers is getting spammed: https://answers.launchpad.net/inkscape [20:47] (also removing spammers still leaves their questions open? can't you trash them too?) [20:53] (FTR, inkscape is considering turning off answers as there is way too much spam) [21:33] mapreri: we normally do trash the questions [21:33] it's an arms race [21:34] let me do a trashing run === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson === salem_ is now known as _salem [22:07] cjwatson: thank you! :) [22:07] * mapreri just assisted at "spam present" ; "reload" ; "spam not present" [22:30] mapreri, cjwatson: The vast majority of things get caught automatically, and I normally check every day or two for things that were missed. [23:42] there's no way to have a snap build daily or when some branch other than the branch containing snapcraft.yaml changes, is there? === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === mwhudson is now known as Guest32650 [23:44] mwhudson_: No built-in way at the moment. [23:44] mwhudson_: But the trigger API is there. [23:45] wgrant: ah ok [23:45] wgrant: i guess nothing magical has happened in the area of being able to get launchpad to give me a macaroon that allows pushing to a single branch? === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [23:48] although i guess that isn't really relevant for this [23:49] mwhudson: LP isn't involved in that, but the snap store allows that. [23:49] LP just uses store macaroons that it's given; it doesn't issue them, since it isn't in control of authorisation. [23:50] wgrant: i meant a git branch on lp [23:52] mwhudson: Oh right. No, that's not currently possible, though we have plans. [23:52] No timeline, though. [23:52] i guess semi-relatedly a macaroon thing that only allowed a single api method to be called would be nice [23:53] Indeed, that was the original goal of the plan.