[00:18] nacc: *takes this here* so I've been told upload NOTHING during freezes (prospective MOTU :P), is it an exception if seeded-in-ubuntu doesn't find anything, or do I still just not upload? [00:18] tsimonq2: FFe policies [00:19] teward: Which I'm asking about. [00:19] exceptions are security issues, bugfix-only, no version bumps. [00:19] FFe process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | FeatureFreeze details: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze [00:19] tsimonq2: it does depend on which freeze you mean [00:19] tsimonq2: FeatureFreeze, it needs approval by the release team I think it is to 'accept new features for a package. [00:20] final freeze is ***really*** really restrictive [00:20] and usually nothing is touched then [00:20] Confused after RTFMing: seeded-in-ubuntu - Determine whether a package is safe to upload during a freeze [00:20] tsimonq2: depending on *which* freeze, depends on the true answer [00:20] on Thurs, I think, we start FeatureFreeze [00:20] and FFe policies go into effect [00:20] tsimonq2: yeah, i think that manpage probably needs an update too :) [00:21] ^ this [00:21] tsimonq2: #ubuntu-motu would also be a valid place to ask this, though it's far less active [00:21] teward: Ok, yeah, I thought this seemed like a releasey question :P [00:21] tsimonq2: well, true, but still [00:22] * teward is more concerned about Perl holding **everything** up === santa is now known as Guest16956 [00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.8.2-1~ubuntu16.10.1] [00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ostree [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2016.15-2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10.1] === Guest3904 is now known as medberry === medberry is now known as med_ === tgm4883_ is now known as tgm4883 [00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.9-1ubuntu3.2] [00:59] RAOF: are you willing to accept bubblewrap, ostree and flatpak as new packages into xenial too? [01:01] jbicha: I'm not able to do that, sorry. Need a fully-fledged AA to do NEW. [01:04] who are the real AAs then? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members [01:07] Both slangasek and infinity are real AAs and have been recently active :) [01:08] * RAOF1 really should get to fully-fledged AA. [01:12] jbicha: what's the rationale for these as new SRUs in xenial? [01:20] slangasek: it's basically the same rationale as snap in trusty: it's a way to get new apps on a stable release [01:29] I'm trying to SRU chrome-gnome-shell too, for trusty and xenial bug 1652537 [01:29] bug 1652537 in chrome-gnome-shell (Ubuntu Xenial) "Update chrome-gnome-shell to version 8 in all supported releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1652537 [01:33] jbicha: ok, but snapd is part of the core Ubuntu platform in xenial and later; providing consistency with that would seem to have a bit more value in an SRU than $arbitrary_app_store? [01:35] slangasek: Ubuntu GNOME 17.04 includes flatpak now [01:36] jbicha: and are there things you currently go through cumbersome SRUs of that you would propose to provide instead via flatpak? [01:37] rbasak, nacc: thanks! [01:37] SRUing of snapd into trusty is a win because it means we can reduce the number of process-heavy SRU exceptions [01:38] The Flatpak maintainer asked if I could get flatpak into Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as they would like Flatpak 0.8 to be available in all LTS distros [01:38] currently, they are recommending xenial users use a PPA to get flatpak: http://flatpak.org/getting.html [01:43] honestly, I don't really use snap or flatpak; the target audience isn't someone who runs the Ubuntu development release [01:43] many GNOME apps are available via flatpak but I don't think are in the snap store yet and obviously the latest stable GNOME is not going to be SRU'd to xenial [01:48] jbicha: right. I don't think I see any reason that this should be disallowed in xenial, but I also don't see any reason to prioritize it relative to SRUs of existing packages [01:49] sure, I can wait [01:50] I've been working on it since December but 2 bubblewrap security bugs had to be fixed in yakkety first [01:50] how about chrome-gnome-shell, which should be in -updates before Firefox 52 gets there next month? [01:53] jbicha: I don't understand, what's the relationship between those two things? [01:58] because Firefox 52 drops support for browser plugins so this is the workaround [01:58] the package name is unfortunate but it implement the chrome webextension api and was originally for chrome/chromium [02:02] jbicha: so what existing functionality is this replacing that will regress when firefox 52 drops? [02:04] does bug 1652537 answer your question? [02:04] bug 1652537 in chrome-gnome-shell (Ubuntu Xenial) "Update chrome-gnome-shell to version 8 in all supported releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1652537 [02:05] jbicha: got it, thanks [02:22] /quit [02:22] woops :P === eylul- is now known as eylul === tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed === andyrock_ is now known as andyrock === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin === WillMoogle_ is now known as WillMoogle [06:12] apw: please check rev 2195 in your hints file, should be armhf ther instead of s390x [06:26] ginggs, bah fixed [06:27] apw: thanks [07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-scrapy-djangoitem [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.1-1] [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [17.04] [10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.3 => 1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.4] (core) === caribou_ is now known as caribou === enyc_ is now known as enic === enic is now known as enyc === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer [11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.4] [11:24] slangasek: I've updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gce-compute-image-packages/+bug/1662491 to add a test for the other udev rule. [11:24] Ubuntu bug 1662491 in gce-compute-image-packages (Ubuntu Yakkety) "gce-compute-image-packages dropped udev rules that were present in gce-utils" [Undecided,New] [11:24] Which happens to be most of a fix for another issue GCE have filed. \o/ [11:30] slangasek: Hmm, actually, the rest of the fix is just dropping a file in /etc/rsyslog.d, so I think it's probably worth doing that as part of this SRU rather than having to do all the busywork again. [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens [11:35] were .manifest files always served up as application/x-ms-manifest? [11:36] hi rbasak, can you please unqueue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libappindicator ? [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.5-1ubuntu1] [11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.3-0ubuntu1] [11:49] am I going mad? [11:49] It looks like unity8 isn't installable in zesty [11:49] can someone confirm? [11:54] Laney, i have it installed, if that counts any [11:55] apw: Probably a component-mismatch [11:56] Although [11:56] oh that likely [11:57] though if you mean in -proposed, then ... i am not helping :) [11:57] wtf [11:58] apw: Do you have the newest version? [11:58] Laney, from zesty-release yes [11:58] Same here. [11:58] unity8 is already the newest version (8.15+17.04.20170206-0ubuntu1). [11:59] As far as I can see unity8-common has Depends: unity-application-impl-26 which doesn't exist [12:00] Oh, unity8-tests in zesty/universe [12:00] eww [12:01] oh did something move from main to universe while installed on your box perhaps [12:02] Laney: bug 1662608 and https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/07/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t16:45 :) [12:02] bug 1662608 in qtmir (Ubuntu) "unity8 should not depend on unity8-tests" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1662608 [12:02] Right, but I didn't link that to a component mismatch [12:03] Laney, hehe that was you :) [12:03] quite how it got out of -proposed with that though [12:06] at a guess, the thing doesn't deal with provides [12:11] How is that bug still in the archive? :/ [12:11] I've been avoiding upgrading to not pull all that crap in. [12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu16 => 229-4ubuntu17] (core) [12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu17] [12:14] Laney: Can you escalate and/or jfdi a fix for that bug? Pulling in the whole X dev stack on upgrade is unpleasant, to say the least. [12:14] Oh, I see an MP from a week ago. [12:14] FFS. [12:14] I'm asking in #-ci-eng [12:18] I set apt-mark hold on the unity8 tests because I didn't want that -dev stuff either :) [12:19] I've just been upgrading instead of dist-upgrading for now. [12:19] So it should be within a day, if this all-proposed run makes their tests go green [12:20] There are lots of other fixes bundled up with the one we want [12:20] The usual thing... [12:23] won't it autoremove off again when the bits are fixed ? [12:26] In theory. [12:27] I don't know [12:27] Actually, no. [12:27] Will you be moved from one provider to another? [12:27] It won't. [12:27] I don't see how [12:27] Yeah, that. [12:27] hrm, why so, that seems counter-intuitive [12:27] apw: It's not that it had a spurious dependency on foo-tests, it's that foo-tests and qtmir-thing both provide virtual-$version, but $version was wrong on qtmir. [12:28] apw: So, you got foo-tests instead. When qtmir is fixed, foo-tests will stick around because it still satisfies the dep. [12:30] MMMmmmmmmmmmm [12:30] So there's a libmirplatform transition [12:30] qtmir -> miral -> libmirplatform [12:30] bump the depends/provides to impl-27? [12:30] and miral FTBFS with a no-change rebuild against this new one [12:30] There's a new upstream release which works apparently [12:32] jbicha: Still wouldn't autoremove, it'd just upgrade unity8-tests to the one that provides the new virtual. :P [12:33] crap, and my machine is already infected with this mess [12:33] ii unity8-tests:amd64 [12:33] drop the unity8-tests package and create a new unity8-tests-oops-our-bad package ;) [12:33] so once i get a fixed unity (and a couple of pints of beer in compensation) i assume i can purge that one [12:39] apw: Yeah, manually removing unity8-tests should autoremove all the rest of the junk at least. [12:39] Manually removing it right now would also do very little harm, except for the bit where we have it in the desktop seed. [12:40] Saviq is OKing me just uploading a Provides switch [12:40] Which we never should have, IMO. Should have been a separate meta, so people could whack it without consequence. [12:40] Laney: Say, why didn't we do that? [12:41] Wait... [12:41] Removing unity8 doesn't remove ubuntu-desktop. [12:41] I could have sworn it was in the desktop seed. [12:41] Recommends [12:41] Ahh. [12:42] Well, that's my solution then. [12:42] I was "dogfooding" it, but it's not like it's actually useful enough for me to do so. [12:44] * Laney LA LA LAs at the lintian errors in qtmir [12:44] * infinity purges libhybris too, to see what that takes with it. [12:48] there we go [12:49] I think this will not get involved with the mirplatform transition === coreycb` is now known as coreycb [13:10] So what's the solution to get rid of unity8-tests? Can I just remove it now? [13:12] If you wait for qtmir to migrate, then apt should offer to install (or upgrade) it when you try to remove unity8-tests [13:13] Right, whereas removing it now removes all of unity8. [13:13] OK, I shall wait. [13:13] Laney, btw, can you please upload the same change to xenial overlay? [13:15] Saviq: sure, if that's allowed [13:19] Laney, yeah, it is [13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.3 (trusty-proposed/main) [9.3.15-0ubuntu0.14.04 => 9.3.16-0ubuntu0.14.04] (no packageset) (sync) [13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.3 [sync] (trusty-proposed) [9.3.16-0ubuntu0.14.04] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (xenial-proposed/main) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core) (sync) [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (yakkety-proposed/main) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.10 => 9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.10] (core) (sync) [13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [sync] (xenial-proposed) [9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.04] [13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.10] [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-8.10] (core, kernel) [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu17] [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nano [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.5.3-2ubuntu2] [14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.9] [14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:2.6.1+dfsg-0ubuntu5.3] [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu2.4] [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu7.2] [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libodb [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.0-1build0~16.04.1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libodb [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4.0-1build0~16.10.1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.10.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [14:48] If anyone has a moment, they could reject gce-compute-image-packages 20160930-0ubuntu4~16.10.0 from the yakkety queue and 20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.1 from the xenial queue. [14:50] slangasek: And these are the new gce-compute-image-packages ^ [14:50] Odd_Bloke: sure [14:51] Odd_Bloke: does that look correct now? [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu4~16.10.0] [14:52] arges: Yep, thanks! [15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libappindicator (xenial-proposed/main) [12.10.1+15.04.20141110-0ubuntu1 => 12.10.1+16.04.20170215-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [15:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-8.10] [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blktap-dkms (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.93-0.5ubuntu1 => 2.0.93-0.7ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (xenial-proposed/multiverse) [6.30.223.271-2 => 6.30.223.271-3~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:33] arges, would you be able to process curtin from Xenial today? [15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dm-writeboost [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1] [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.7.1-1 => 2.8.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) [16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oss4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.2-build2010-5 => 4.2-build2010-5ubuntu1~14.04.1] (no packageset) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oss4 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu1~14.04.1] [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.10-1build1 => 2.10-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blktap-dkms [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.93-0.7ubuntu2~16.04.1] [16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted broadcom-sta [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.30.223.271-3~16.04.1] [16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xtables-addons [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.10-1ubuntu0.1] [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libodb-boost (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1build0~16.04.1] (no packageset) [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libodb-boost (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1build0~16.10.1] (no packageset) [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) [16:55] yes, unfortunately, package structure for nginx changed thanks to Debian and Dynamic Modules >.> [17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.14+16.10ubuntu2 => 0.15+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset) [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.14+16.04ubuntu2 => 0.15+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset) === Eliz is now known as Elizabeth [17:44] infinity: No new iso this morning? [17:44] dmj_s76: Very shortly. Just testing a build now. [17:44] Or, rather, it's building so I can test it. [17:44] infinity: oh, great...we're eagerly waiting to test :) [18:09] slangasek: I'm EOD now; it would be lovely to wake up to gce-compute-image-packages packages in -proposed. ^_^ [18:31] Odd_Bloke: .changes file ended up with no bug references; having a look at this, probably just a no-change reupload from me === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.10.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] [19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] [20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] [20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] [20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (precise-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] (no packageset) [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset) [20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] [20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] [20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (precise-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added [21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215.2) [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215.2) [22:33] infinity: what's new with the ISO? [22:46] wxl: I thought HWE stuff but I could be wrong [22:51] tsimonq2: yeah well knowing that is always helpful XD [22:51] if that's all it is, we'll mostly look at smoke testing [22:52] wxl: I could have sworn there was a way we can just diff the freaking ISOs! [22:52] tsimonq2: well you could grab the manifest and diff them for sure [22:52] maybe i'll just do that. sigh. :) [22:54] of course the old manifest is overwritten :/ [22:54] and all the flavours have already built soooooo [22:55] * tsimonq2 changes wxl's locale back to en_US from en_GB [22:55] :P [22:55] no way man i use en_CA XD [23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ht-el [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2.1-1] (no packageset) [23:12] wxl: Aw what really? :P [23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-isort-el [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2016.1-1] (no packageset) [23:15] the manifest for the previous image would still be under the previous build serial [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: proftpd-dfsg (trusty-proposed/universe) [1.3.5~rc3-2.1ubuntu2.1 => 1.3.5~rc3-2.1ubuntu2.2] (no packageset) [23:15] for images where the old one rotated off, well, not so much [23:19] tsimonq2: no. :) [23:20] wxl: Good. :P [23:21] slangasek: yeah it's weird cuz when i looked this morning there was both 20170209 and 20170208 but now there's just one. [23:21] yes, they're expired based on age [23:21] booo [23:21] slangasek: Where's the tooling that builds the images again? [23:22] tsimonq2: which piece? lp:ubuntu-cdimage? [23:22] slangasek: I mean the thing that builds the dailies. [23:22] slangasek: Like, installs the packages and such. [23:23] do you mean lp:livecd-rootfs? [23:23] Maaaybe... [23:23] * tsimonq2 checks [23:25] slangasek: Hm so it doesn't LOOK like it. Maybe I'm not looking right? [23:26] well, I'm not sure which piece you're looking for [23:26] hold on [23:26] i think i can answer this [23:26] wxl: Yes siree please do :) [23:26] the chain is ubuntu-cdimage -> (launchpad-buildd -> livecd-rootfs -> live-build), debian-cd [23:27] Ooh, mkay. [23:27] yeah that's what i was going to say based on the crontab === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === mwhudson is now known as Guest32650 === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson