[08:31] <junaidali> Hi jam , will the fix for this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1646329 land in 2.0.X?
[08:31] <mup> Bug #1646329: juju ssh/scp proxy ip address selection oddities <landscape> <juju:Fix Released by jameinel> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1646329>
[08:33] <jam> junaidali: I believe at this point there aren't plans to release another 2.0.x after 2.0.3, so I don't think it will.
[08:37] <junaidali> thanks jam , any idea when will stable 2.1 be released?
[08:38] <jam> junaidali: rc2 was last week. I think final is supposed to be Wed
[08:38] <junaidali> thanks jam :)
[22:10] <mup> Bug #1666069 opened: openstack provider: juju does not give any error if trusty instance forever in pending because of missing image metadata <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666069>
[22:20] <mup> Bug #1666069 changed: openstack provider: juju does not give any error if trusty instance forever in pending because of missing image metadata <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666069>
[22:23] <mup> Bug #1666069 opened: openstack provider: juju does not give any error if trusty instance forever in pending because of missing image metadata <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666069>
[23:29] <axw> wallyworld: sticking with existing standup time today?
[23:30] <wallyworld> axw: yeah, i thought it best to not change the very first one
[23:40] <babbageclunk> thumper: When running transactions in state, can we sometimes see the txn get partially applied before getting killed with an ErrAborted?
[23:47] <babbageclunk> thumper: I'm seeing a situation (in a test) where we try running the txn with 15 ops, which fails with ErrAborted, then the second attempt has only 3 ops and succeeds. Seems weird?
[23:48] <wallyworld> thumper: we miss you