| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 02:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 02:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gocryptfs [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gocryptfs [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gocryptfs [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gocryptfs [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nut [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu1] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nut [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.7.4-5ubuntu2] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gocryptfs [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.2-2ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gocryptfs [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.2-2ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gocryptfs [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.2-2ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gocryptfs [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.2-2ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1] (kubuntu) | 13:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x265 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1] | 14:17 | |
| santa_ | good afternoon release wizards | 14:51 |
|---|---|---|
| santa_ | we have a problem right now with gpgme blocking the migration of most kubuntu's packaging out of -proposed | 14:52 |
| santa_ | gpgme is making another package FTBFS with -proposed enabled | 14:53 |
| santa_ | therefore that is making many autopkgtests fail | 14:53 |
| santa_ | we proposed a fix for this here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1647204/comments/44 | 14:54 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1647204 in gpgme1.0 (Ubuntu) "1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 14:54 |
| santa_ | but we would need an upload of this fix (we don't have any active motu on the team unfortunately) | 14:54 |
| santa_ | so if you could help us with this particular issue, that would be terrific. thanks in advance | 14:55 |
| clivejo | apw: would you be able to help on the above? ^ | 14:57 |
| mapreri | santa_: gpgme1.0 is in main, so you'd need a core-dev, not a motu (so I can't help) | 14:59 |
| santa_ | mapreri: oh, thanks for the clarification. I still need to get more familiar with ubuntu's "bureaucracy" :) | 15:01 |
| clivejo | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1647204 | 15:02 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1647204 in gpgme1.0 (Ubuntu) "1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 15:02 |
| clivejo | should we sub the sponsor team again? | 15:02 |
| mapreri | it's already subscribed | 15:02 |
| mapreri | let me ask dkg if he'd upload that to debian | 15:03 |
| apw | is the whole change the reduction in the thread count from 100 to 10 in those two tests ? that feels like a rather arbitrary fix without context. | 15:05 |
| apw | what is the symptoms when it is at 100 ? | 15:05 |
| mapreri | launchpad-buildd hangs. | 15:06 |
| santa_ | apw: it doesn't build, let me dig a bit, to see if I can find the specific failure... | 15:06 |
| santa_ | apw: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/18/%23kubuntu-devel.html#t20:02 | 15:07 |
| apw | santa_, the patch implies but does not elucidate that you have confirmed that the failure it finds is not the intended failure mode tested but some other factor | 15:07 |
| apw | santa_, ok that does tell me more what i wanted to know | 15:08 |
| apw | it would be good if the patch said that we run out of memory in a fork-storm | 15:08 |
| jbicha | yes, I subscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors to that bug several hours ago | 15:08 |
| clivejo | thanks jbicha | 15:08 |
| jbicha | have the Ubuntu Qt maintainers seen this bug? that QtCore error seemed odd | 15:11 |
| mapreri | santa_: from dkg (gpg* maintainer in Debian): https://paste.debian.net/plain/915558 | 15:50 |
| mapreri | (guess it's a FYI) | 15:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 16:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Beta 1] has been updated (20170219) | 16:00 | |
| apw | mapreri, santa_, that osunds liek the symlink makes no sense ... | 16:31 |
| santa_ | we could try to patch the kde package which is failing to build instead | 16:33 |
| clivejo | apw: how should it be done? | 16:33 |
| santa_ | in any case that is meant to be a temporary thing to be droped later | 16:33 |
| apw | santa_, it sounds like that is essentially a transition for the consumers of that library, if that change is dev library is expected | 16:33 |
| clivejo | its a bit of a vicious circle | 16:35 |
| clivejo | kf5-kdepim-apps-libs is the package that needs it | 16:37 |
| apw | clivejo, well that is only a build-time depedency and we are uploading this to free built-binaries | 16:37 |
| apw | clivejo, so why does it need that. and if we are having to rebuild _that_ anyhow, it would be just as easy to fix it, in theory | 16:37 |
| clivejo | KDE PIM | 16:38 |
| apw | * libkf5gpgmepp-dev (for libgpgme11-dev) | 16:38 |
| apw | that is the only reverse-depends right? | 16:38 |
| clivejo | huge beast of a thing and not having a working gpgme has lead to us having to hold it back for now | 16:38 |
| apw | clivejo, will someone get round to fixing the reverse-depends if i let you bodge this, and remember to remove the bodge | 16:39 |
| clivejo | If I recall kf5-kdepim-apps-libs is split out into new packages | 16:40 |
| apw | oh gawd | 16:41 |
| apw | someone on your side like to make your life hard | 16:41 |
| clivejo | oh yes | 16:41 |
| clivejo | remember that list of new packages I told you about? | 16:41 |
| clivejo | approx 20 new packages for PIM | 16:42 |
| apw | i guess now you have lots of FFEs to file too | 16:42 |
| clivejo | but its either an all or nothing | 16:43 |
| clivejo | so far we have held back the PIM packages to 16.04 and its deps | 16:45 |
| apw | ok i'll look at this patch and perhaps mark that patch for not carrying forward in the next merge | 16:46 |
| apw | so you have to do something about it then :) | 16:46 |
| clivejo | can you hold back on it a sec | 16:46 |
| * apw stops | 16:47 | |
| clivejo | would you be willing to force kf5-kdepim-apps-libs tests? | 16:47 |
| clivejo | would the release team work with us to ensure the new packages are accepted and get in? | 16:49 |
| apw | i assume if they ahve been accepted for the release (as in FFE or whatever equivalent it needed) | 16:49 |
| apw | then i assume we would work with you to get them in | 16:49 |
| clivejo | who would make that decision? | 16:50 |
| apw | well at this stage i assume a big pile of updates would need an FFE, so that would be the place | 16:50 |
| apw | to ahve the discussion. i am assuming that if KDE wants KDE to be specific thing, and are committing | 16:51 |
| apw | the effort to get it done, then it would get approved. but i don't think i should make that decision on my own | 16:51 |
| clivejo | well these are all the latest KDE Apps 16.12 | 16:51 |
| apw | so right now we have half of KDE as 16.12 and half as 16.04, which sounds like a bad idea from a support | 16:52 |
| clivejo | but as we had problems with gpgme and 20+ new packages to get in, we have been holding off | 16:52 |
| apw | point of view... and i assume it is that you would be asking to correct | 16:52 |
| clivejo | our aim is to get everything to 16.12 | 16:53 |
| apw | and that sounds like a laudible and sensible plan to me, so would likely get my vote | 16:53 |
| clivejo | but with PIM deps, one part of it not working, can bring the entire stack down | 16:54 |
| apw | presumably that is an argument for it being in sync version wise | 16:54 |
| santa_ | I think we could do it | 16:55 |
| santa_ | but we need to get the NEW packages accepted | 16:55 |
| santa_ | right now we have good resources to update all of this | 16:55 |
| apw | right the point of the FFE would be commiting both sides to it | 16:56 |
| clivejo | we have no MOTU's on our team at the moment, and found it very difficult to get previous NEW packages accpted | 16:56 |
| apw | clivejo, yep, someone would likely be voluntold to help with New reviews | 16:57 |
| clivejo | so for the FFE, we would open it against something high up in that stack, like Kontact? | 16:58 |
| santa_ | apw: ok, I think the thing is doable in our side; what we can offer is 1. packages not ftbfsing, 2. most autopkgtests passing in amd64/i386 | 17:00 |
| santa_ | about the autopkgtests I would expect a little bit of mercy on some things | 17:00 |
| clivejo | esp on weird arch's! | 17:00 |
| apw | clivejo, nominally on all packages you want to update (obviously not on the ones which do not exist) so perhaps the one you are splitting or something | 17:00 |
| clivejo | most exist already, just split from source package | 17:03 |
| clivejo | http://paste.ubuntu.com/24027977/ | 17:03 |
| clivejo | apw: that would take forever, PIM has a lot of packages | 17:05 |
| clivejo | in the past we have selected one top tier package and opened an FFE for that to cover all the packages below | 17:05 |
| apw | clivejo, do what you did before indeed; get all that information in the FFE and do send me the bug number where you get that | 17:06 |
| clivejo | this is an example of Frameworks FFE - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1625392 | 17:06 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1625392 in plasma-desktop (Ubuntu) "[FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.26.0 into the Yakkety Archive" [Undecided,Fix released] | 17:06 |
| apw | clivejo, whatever worked last time, do that | 17:06 |
| clivejo | apw: is it possible to hold the entire packageset in proposed until we are happy everything is working as it should? | 17:08 |
| apw | clivejo, we can cirtainly block things in -proposed | 17:08 |
| clivejo | but like 50 odd packages? | 17:08 |
| clivejo | apw: could you force-bad-tests kf5-kdepim-apps-libs for the time being? | 17:13 |
| clivejo | its holding back 5 key frameworks from migrating | 17:16 |
| apw | clivejo, if you make me a list of what you want held, it can be held | 17:17 |
| apw | if there are some key libraries tha the remainder dep on we can hold those, and the rest get help as a result | 17:17 |
| clivejo | ok, its more a thought at the moment | 17:17 |
| clivejo | we know that KDE PIM 16.04 is working and is tested very well | 17:18 |
| clivejo | 16.12 I know amd64 is working great, but we would need feedback for other arch | 17:19 |
| santa_ | I would like to note that we still have some problems with some archs | 17:22 |
| santa_ | http://gpul.grupos.udc.es/ka-iron-hand_reports/applications_staging/16.12.1_zesty_retry_builds.pdf | 17:22 |
| santa_ | we will work on it | 17:23 |
| santa_ | we also have a private wannabuild/buildd infrastructure to check the autopkgtests | 17:23 |
| apw | clivejo, ok that ADT failure is triggered by the fact the tests mandate a rebuild, which we know will fail | 17:24 |
| apw | clivejo, so i think we can badtest that reasonable. | 17:25 |
| clivejo | thanks | 17:26 |
| santa_ | apw: thank you very much, we are going to work on kde applications issues on our side | 17:35 |
| valorie | Hi folks, I was just setting up torrents for seeding 16.04.2 and I see that Lubuntu i386 seems to be missing here: http://torrent.ubuntu.com:6969/ | 23:48 |
| valorie | I checked and it is marked ready, and was reported as such here in the chan | 23:48 |
| valorie | infinity: ^^^ | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!