| === JanC is now known as Guest31516 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| === gaughen_ is now known as gaughen | ||
| sil2100 | o/ | 16:00 |
|---|---|---|
| * slangasek waves | 16:00 | |
| robru | \o | 16:01 |
| slangasek | #startmeeting | 16:02 |
| meetingology | Meeting started Thu Feb 23 16:02:17 2017 UTC. The chair is slangasek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 16:02 |
| meetingology | Available commands: action commands idea info link nick | 16:02 |
| slangasek | [TOPIC] Lightning round | 16:02 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Lightning round | ||
| slangasek | $ echo $(shuf -e barry doko bdmurray slangasek caribou infinity sil2100 robru cyphermox tdaitx xnox chiluk mwhudson) | 16:02 |
| slangasek | chiluk sil2100 cyphermox infinity tdaitx doko barry mwhudson xnox slangasek bdmurray caribou robru | 16:02 |
| robru | wooohooo! | 16:03 |
| slangasek | chiluk: hi, anything for this week? | 16:03 |
| chiluk | lp 1647389 .. is all .. It's being a real bear to track down | 16:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1647389 in qemu (Ubuntu) "Regression: Live migrations can still crash after CVE-2016-5403 fix" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1647389 | 16:04 |
| chiluk | -done- | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - Landing team work, silo coordination | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - SRU reviews | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - Reviewing the xenial linux-hwe kernel SRU (urgent) | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - Writing up a script to inform me of any kernel SRU actions required | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - Further examination of failing xenial-i386 builds for touch | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | * Resolved with latest qtmir landing | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - walinuxagent: | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | * Discussion with upstream about the configuration split concept | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | * Waiting on: final upstream decision and test results | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | - ubuntu-image: | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | * Removing any hard-coded sector-size values | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | * Looking into ubuntu-image CI - e.g. how it's done | 16:05 |
| sil2100 | (done) | 16:05 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox sent an e-mail he might be late | 16:08 |
| cyphermox | Sorry, around but on my cell, can't really past summary | 16:08 |
| slangasek | ok | 16:08 |
| slangasek | no infinity | 16:08 |
| slangasek | tdaitx: | 16:08 |
| sil2100 | ...or that :) | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * 1 day off (or, more precisely, 2 half-days if anyone cares) | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | = OpenJDK | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Going through their contribution policy now that we have OCA (thanks steve!) | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Reviewing patches that we can (re)submit | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | = Other | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Checking and learning about debhelper 9 tools (and changes since 5) | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Going through a few OpenJDK (7 and 8) LP bugs (LP: #1573673, Debian: #855686, Debian: #853758, LP: #1548434, Debian: #855858, ...) | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Merging open-vm-tools (LP: #1651608) | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1573673 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u77-b03-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1573673 | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | = OpenJDK 7 (low priority, thus taking longer than usual) | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 855686 in src:icedtea-web "icedtea-web: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (mozilla-plugin) were not met" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/855686 | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 853758 in openjdk-8 "openjdk-8: Please cherry-pick 8dfbb002197a / fix for JDK-8164293 [memory leak in hotspot]" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/853758 | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1548434 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "jmap -heap broken since update to 7u95-2.6.4-0ubuntu0.14.04.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1548434 | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Testing new package changes on OpenJDK 7u131, simplifying build | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 855858 in openjdk-8-jre "[openjdk-8-jre] jexec'ing .jar-files through binfmt doesn't work" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/855858 | 16:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1651608 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu) "please rebase open-vm-tools to version 10.1.0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1651608 | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * Testing mauve | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | = AOB | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | * My beloved router is now a brick unless I manage to write directly to flash, will fetch a replacement today | 16:08 |
| tdaitx | (done) | 16:08 |
| slangasek | sil2100: removing hard-coded sector-size values> how is that going to work? is this for planning to support 4096 disks? | 16:09 |
| slangasek | doko: | 16:09 |
| barry | slangasek: LP: #1667313 | 16:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1667313 in Ubuntu Image "Stop hard-coding sector size to 512" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1667313 | 16:10 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: not as deep like that for now, but will open up to possibilities like that in the future - for now I want to get rid of hard coding and just trust the sector size that parted gives us | 16:10 |
| doko | - was on vacation last Thu and Fri | 16:10 |
| doko | - prepare rust packaging, backports for trusty and xenial | 16:10 |
| doko | - toolchain updates for zesty | 16:10 |
| doko | - new processing, MIRs, ... | 16:10 |
| doko | - GCC 7 updates | 16:10 |
| doko | (done) | 16:10 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: since that's what we use for all paritioning right now | 16:10 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: but on the bug I did mention we should maybe make sector size configurable | 16:10 |
| cyphermox | +1 | 16:11 |
| cyphermox | Default to a sane value and make it configurable. I'm not sure if it was with parted that we sometimes has weird behavior for 4k drives | 16:12 |
| sil2100 | Bug for tracking: LP: #1667313 | 16:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1667313 in Ubuntu Image "Stop hard-coding sector size to 512" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1667313 | 16:12 |
| sil2100 | Now the question would be: should this be in the gadget.yaml or an explicit option in ubuntu-image? Since to me it's more the former | 16:13 |
| barry | sil2100: fwiw, i commented on the bug with my thoughts | 16:14 |
| tdaitx | btw, if someone knows stuff that should really *not* be used in debhelper (bad idea, doesn't work/scale well, ...), I'm all ears | 16:15 |
| sil2100 | barry: ah, I see now, thanks! :) | 16:16 |
| barry | short week due to usa holiday | 16:16 |
| slangasek | barry: your turn | 16:16 |
| barry | ubuntu-image: LP: #1665014; LP: #1666173; LP: #1666580; LP: #1631156; 1.0 bug triaging; LP: #1667140 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1665014 in ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Yakkety) "SRU 0.15 tracking bug" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1665014 | 16:16 |
| barry | debuntu: LP: #1647031 - i re-cherry-picked the network-manager resolved patch, but apparently some people are still having trouble. should discuss re-reverting for zesty; flufl.bounce 3.0 for python 3; LP: #1647204; gpgme1.0 still blocked (due to beta1 freeze?) | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1666173 in Ubuntu Image "Failed to create an image by using ubuntu-image (0.15+snap3)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666173 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1666580 in Ubuntu Image "sfdisk crash when pc-boot.img is too big" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666580 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1631156 in Ubuntu Image "flake8.extension entry point has global ramifications" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1631156 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1667140 in Ubuntu Image "Change d/tests to use -O instead of -o" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1667140 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1647031 in systemd "systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1647204 in gpgme1.0 (Ubuntu) "1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 | 16:16 |
| barry | other: subiquity testing | 16:16 |
| barry | --done-- | 16:16 |
| slangasek | barry: wrt > 440B mbrs... is that in the gadget.yaml spec? It had been in one iteration when the docs were in ubuntu-image, I think | 16:17 |
| slangasek | and xnox is away | 16:18 |
| slangasek | * short week due to swap last Friday | 16:18 |
| slangasek | * processing of old Debian removals as of FF | 16:18 |
| slangasek | * worked with infinity to get the ball moving on powerpc removal | 16:18 |
| slangasek | * continued focus on cloud-image builds | 16:18 |
| slangasek | (done) | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | worked with mvo regarding receiving snap crashes at errors | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | wrote a database query to find snap reports | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | worked on snapping apport (crash reports being created) | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | discovered snappy bugs LP: #1613971, LP: #1665756 | 16:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1613971 in Snappy "using oneshot results in failed service" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1613971 | 16:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1665756 in Snappy "environment variable setting issue" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1665756 | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | updated bug bot for 16.04.2 ISO checksums and recommends | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | review of foundations-bugs | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | submitted some MIR bugs | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | uploaded vlc SRU for LP: #1639750 | 16:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1639750 in vlc (Ubuntu Xenial) "subtitle downloads hang" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1639750 | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | ✔ done | 16:18 |
| caribou | LP: #1638695 - python performance regression in Xenial | 16:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1638695 in python2.7 (Ubuntu) "Python 2.7.12 performance regression" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1638695 | 16:18 |
| caribou | working with doko on this one | 16:19 |
| caribou | VPN reconfiguration | 16:19 |
| caribou | Sosreport 3.3 trusty SRU | 16:19 |
| caribou | Sponsor ceph and sssd SRU | 16:19 |
| caribou | (done) | 16:19 |
| slangasek | robru: | 16:19 |
| robru | * britney email notifications almost complete (thanks to Laney for some gpg example code) | 16:19 |
| robru | * some archive maintenance mentoring from cyphermox | 16:19 |
| robru | (done) | 16:19 |
| slangasek | email notifications> nice! | 16:20 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 16:20 |
| slangasek | any questions over status? | 16:20 |
| bdmurray | robru: what does almost complete mean in terms of rollout? what will we see? | 16:20 |
| barry | slangasek: the bug someone saw had a proper size in the gadget.yaml but accidently produced a .img contents that was 512 bytes, so it blew up on them. while investigating i saw an XXX comment about how we should actually check that the contents of an 'image:' specified partition should actually check that it fits in the partition size. ;) that's the bug i'm fixing (i.e. not specifically mbr related, just any partition with contents > | 16:20 |
| barry | gadget.yaml specified size) | 16:20 |
| robru | bdmurray: the code is basically complete. all I need is to write some unit tests, and maybe iterate on the wording of the emails that get sent out (they're pretty terse at the moment). I expect to submit for code review tomorrow then roll out monday or tuesday once somebody approves it | 16:21 |
| gaughen | slangasek, are we done with status? | 16:21 |
| gaughen | that's my question about status | 16:21 |
| slangasek | barry: ok. does the documentation also state that mbr is enforced to 440B? | 16:22 |
| slangasek | (if you don't know offhand, that's fine) | 16:22 |
| barry | slangasek: 446B to be exact | 16:22 |
| barry | slangasek: and yes, we enforce that in the parser | 16:22 |
| slangasek | yeah, mine was a question of the documentation | 16:23 |
| slangasek | anyway | 16:23 |
| barry | slangasek: yep, it's documented here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/wiki/Gadget-snap#gadget.yaml | 16:23 |
| slangasek | ok, great | 16:23 |
| slangasek | [TOPIC] AOB | 16:23 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: AOB | ||
| slangasek | gaughen: your turn :) | 16:23 |
| gaughen | so my status less status and more questions | 16:24 |
| gaughen | subquity - please give feedback | 16:25 |
| cyphermox | Ah yes, thanks for mentioning | 16:26 |
| barry | slangasek: we may have to roll back that network-manager change again :( | 16:26 |
| barry | slangasek: and can you check if gpgme1.0 -proposed block is explicit or tied to beta 1 freeze? | 16:26 |
| cyphermox | Barry provided some good feedback, some of it is due to the run being a dry run | 16:27 |
| cyphermox | And to exit subiquity : ctrl-x | 16:27 |
| gaughen | thanks barry! | 16:27 |
| barry | cyphermox: on the nm cherry pick? | 16:27 |
| cyphermox | No, for subiquity | 16:27 |
| barry | cyphermox: ah | 16:27 |
| cyphermox | Why revert nm again? | 16:28 |
| slangasek | barry: because of the DNSSEC thing? | 16:28 |
| gaughen | and my other question is how do we look regarding 17.04 | 16:28 |
| barry | slangasek: yep | 16:28 |
| gaughen | feature freeze was last week | 16:28 |
| barry | slangasek: it works fine for me, but there have been reports of problems | 16:28 |
| slangasek | barry: you can check this directly in lp:~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/ for the rationale, and if it says 'block request by freeze' that always means freeze | 16:29 |
| barry | slangasek: ack | 16:30 |
| slangasek | barry: I'd really not like to roll it back yet again; maybe this is something cyphermox can look at | 16:30 |
| slangasek | to see if we can sort out the DNSSEC problem on the systemd-resolved side sooner? | 16:30 |
| barry | slangasek, cyphermox +1 - let's talk after the meeting. i haven't had time yet to investigate, but i'm fairly confident the cherry pick went okay ;) | 16:31 |
| slangasek | yes, it's clear to me this is unrelated to the first issue we were backing out for | 16:31 |
| * sil2100 needs to go and play with the cat | 16:31 | |
| sil2100 | It demands attention badly | 16:31 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 16:31 |
| slangasek | but gaughen asked a question | 16:31 |
| slangasek | how do we look regarding 17.04 | 16:32 |
| slangasek | gaughen maybe wants to expand on this :) | 16:32 |
| bdmurray | we look smashing | 16:32 |
| barry | tremendous | 16:32 |
| barry | best release ever, believe me | 16:33 |
| slangasek | nobody has better binaries than us | 16:33 |
| bdmurray | we've made it great again | 16:33 |
| slangasek | etc | 16:33 |
| barry | obquote: yooge | 16:33 |
| slangasek | did we get where we needed to be on merges of new upstream versions from Debian before FF? | 16:34 |
| slangasek | I know infinity is still working on glibc | 16:34 |
| * barry feels pretty good about the packages he's watching | 16:34 | |
| gaughen | slangasek, any major items that still need to be done? I know about glibc | 16:35 |
| slangasek | gaughen: there's your answer, everybody feels good | 16:35 |
| gaughen | and slangasek you've been doing package removals, do you need help? | 16:35 |
| gaughen | is there any other sorts of things like that which needs to be done now | 16:36 |
| bdmurray | I'd like to help removing packages | 16:36 |
| doko | dpkg merge? | 16:36 |
| slangasek | I'm done with the removals that I think were reasonable for this cycle | 16:36 |
| gaughen | slangasek, everbody = barry? | 16:36 |
| doko | and decisions about pie on arm64? | 16:36 |
| slangasek | and we talked about wanting a report view of process-removals output (bdmurray?) | 16:36 |
| doko | although again a bit late for this cycle | 16:36 |
| slangasek | doko: infinity mentioned dpkg merge in his email; I'm not sure there's any justification for doing that as an FFe though | 16:37 |
| doko | probably not | 16:37 |
| bdmurray | slangasek: is there a time to have it done by for it to be useful this cycle? | 16:37 |
| slangasek | pie on arm64> I still have the action to follow up with andrewc, we should get an answer on the overall strategy but I think we can safely assume it's not critical for 17.04 | 16:38 |
| bdmurray | it'd be helpful if xnox looked at bug 1651623 | 16:39 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: I think it provides some utility at any point ... scanning the list for "stale and ancient things without revdeps that could be removed" can be done whenever someone has a free moment | 16:39 |
| ubottu | bug 1651623 in apport (Ubuntu Yakkety) "adt tests fail on zesty for apport" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1651623 | 16:39 |
| bdmurray | the upstream maintainer of unattended-upgrades hasn't merged a couple of my patches, I guess I should just stick them in zesty now? | 16:40 |
| barry | slangasek: looks like gpgme1.0 is listed in the freeze file. is there any record of the rationale for that? | 16:40 |
| slangasek | barry: any rationale is listed in comments in that file | 16:40 |
| barry | the only comment in that file says "# generate-freeze-block ubuntukylin ..." | 16:41 |
| barry | then "block a11y-..." | 16:41 |
| slangasek | barry: essentially, though, our freezes are governed by momentum, where we continue to apply the same process we always have even though this is now opt-in and it penalizes flavors that have opted out but are /derived from/ by flavors that opt in (namely, ubuntu-desktop -> ubuntukylin) | 16:41 |
| slangasek | yes, the comment tells you which flavors are frozen for | 16:41 |
| slangasek | from there you can look at the Task: field on the binary package to see which flavor is directly responsible, if you care | 16:42 |
| slangasek | but if it's in the freeze file, it's because it's part of a milestone freee | 16:42 |
| barry | slangasek: cool, that's what i wanted to know. and that's fine, we can wait until after milestone freeze is lifted (or if prudent, just say it's too late for zesty, or do a ffe) | 16:43 |
| slangasek | barry: wait for what exactly? | 16:43 |
| slangasek | barry: anything that's uploaded to zesty-proposed today is already a candidate for inclusion and doesn't need an FFe | 16:44 |
| barry | it was uploaded several days ago | 16:44 |
| slangasek | yes, I'm saying if it's *in* -proposed today, there's nothing you should be filing an FFe about unless you should have filed one before you uploaded it | 16:44 |
| slangasek | but filing the FFe or not has no effect on whether the package will make it into the release from -proposed | 16:45 |
| barry | cool | 16:45 |
| slangasek | there is, in any case, a lot of work to be done to work through the set of packages blocked in -proposed | 16:46 |
| barry | yep | 16:46 |
| slangasek | (not gpgme1.0, that will go in as soon as the freeze lifts, which should be today) | 16:46 |
| slangasek | ok - anything else today? | 16:46 |
| barry | cool. yeah, fixing that package's build problems on arm, etc. was, um, fun | 16:47 |
| slangasek | unaligned access? :P | 16:47 |
| barry | entropy exhaustion and compiler flags (two separate problems) | 16:47 |
| slangasek | ah :) | 16:48 |
| slangasek | #endmeeting | 16:49 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
| meetingology | Meeting ended Thu Feb 23 16:49:26 2017 UTC. | 16:49 |
| meetingology | Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-02-23-16.02.moin.txt | 16:49 |
| slangasek | thanks, everyone! | 16:49 |
| barry | thanks! | 16:49 |
| xnox | bdmurray, hey, at least mdadm/xenial is now sorted (in -proposed) =) | 19:39 |
| bdmurray | well that's something! | 19:39 |
| === lamont` is now known as lamont | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!