[10:41] <greyback> alan_g: qtmir still building ok for me here after all updates
[10:42] <alan_g> greyback: it is working for me in CI, but now failing locally!
[10:43] <greyback> alan_g: zesty I presume. Care to share the error message?
[10:44] <alan_g> X+O actually, I got a compile error (wrong version of dep I guessed) on Zesty so switched to my test laptop for qtmir
[10:45] <greyback> oh, let me try that
[10:45]  * alan_g should try Zesty again
[11:10] <alan_g> greyback: on Zesty I have "Broken qtmir-build-deps:amd64 Depends on libubuntu-app-launch3-dev:amd64...I can't find libubuntu-app-launch3-dev:amd64"
[11:19] <greyback> alan_g: I don't have a libubuntu-app-launch3-dev installed, only 2-dev. But I do have  libubuntu-app-launch3 installed. Both with equal versions. You might be on to something
[11:32] <alan_g> greyback: not sure what's going on. But cmake says "No package 'ubuntu-app-launch-3' found" and I apt search doesn't find it.
[11:33] <greyback> alan_g: it is in zesty-proposed
[11:33] <alan_g> Ah. I'm on the plain archive.
[11:34]  * alan_g will stick to X+O for qtmir today
[11:34] <greyback> alan_g: which should be fine. I presume it got stuck in release
[11:35] <alan_g> A bit odd that I see libubuntu-app-launch3 but not -dev, but SEP
[11:35] <greyback> that confuses me too
[11:36] <greyback> afaics it should pass through proposed fairly soon
[11:38] <greyback> On X+O I do get a lttng fail when running tests though, that is new
[11:42] <alan_g> Glad to have that confirmed, but CI seems to have recovered from that - so I'm losing interest. (OTOH I don't know why my laptop hasn't)
[11:46]  * alan_g has found a (probably) Mir bug to track down instead
[13:44] <dandrader> alan_g, confirm_inherited_move takes a Displacement and returns a Rectangle. Does that mean that a movement can affect the window's dimensions!?
[13:45] <dandrader> alan_g, if the policy wants to do it, that is
[13:48] <dandrader> alan_g, but that also means that the policy has to be careful enough when filling the returned Rectangle if it doesn't want to affect the window size there...
[13:55] <alan_g> dandrader: that's right
[14:13] <dandrader> alan_g, can MirWindowVisibility affect MirWindowState? Ie, if a window is mir_window_visibility_occluded, can miral refuse to apply certain state changes?
[14:14] <alan_g> By miral do you mean libmiral or a server using it?
[14:16] <dandrader> alan_g, miral or mir
[14:16] <alan_g> dandrader: no, I can't see a reason to do that
[14:17] <dandrader> alan_g, what about a window that is not "ready" yet?
[14:18] <dandrader> alan_g, can that affect state changes?
[14:18] <alan_g> dandrader: no, I can't see a reason to do that
[14:18] <dandrader> alan_g, ok
[14:19] <dandrader> trying to make sense of a strange behavior in unity8
[14:19]  * alan_g feels he hasn't understood the real question
[14:19] <alan_g> Ah! U8 is often a mystery to me.
[14:19] <dandrader> :)
[14:23]  * davmor2 hands alan_g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgee3IGYZsU
[14:24]  * alan_g suspects rickrolling
[14:25] <davmor2> alan_g: I promise it isn't
[14:26] <davmor2> alan_g: it's just an apt song for your U8 knowledge :D
[14:26] <alan_g> Is Toyah better?
[14:27] <davmor2> alan_g: Hey I know way more annoying songs
[14:28] <greyback> that's true, he does
[14:28] <alan_g> LOL