| tsimonq2 | Could someome please approve my message in the ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list queue? | 00:41 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimonq2 | *someone | 00:41 |
| cjwatson | tsimonq2: done | 01:46 |
| tsimonq2 | cjwatson: kthx | 01:48 |
| === maxb_ is now known as maxb | ||
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrome-gnome-shell (yakkety-proposed/universe) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.10.1 => 8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.10.2] (no packageset) | 04:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: chrome-gnome-shell (xenial-proposed/primary) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.0] | 04:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: chrome-gnome-shell (trusty-proposed/primary) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu14.04.1] | 04:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrome-gnome-shell (yakkety-proposed/universe) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.10.1 => 8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.10.1] (no packageset) | 05:55 | |
| Mirv | I don't know quite how to explain the i386 only camitk autopkgtest failure at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src but also it seems unlikely the tray icon patches would cause the error of detecting unknown CamiTK version.. | 06:39 |
| Mirv | anyway, that one would be the only one blocking the migration of that patch update | 06:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chrome-gnome-shell [source] (yakkety-proposed) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.10.2] | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected chrome-gnome-shell [source] (xenial-proposed) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu16.04.0] | 06:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected chrome-gnome-shell [source] (trusty-proposed) [8-2ubuntu3~ubuntu14.04.1] | 07:00 | |
| apw | jbicha, chrome-gnome-shell ... i think these backports look reasonable, but can you explain the odd numbering on xenial please | 07:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrome-gnome-shell [source] (yakkety-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.10.1] | 07:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-trusty [amd64] (precise-proposed) [3.13.0-111.158~precise1] | 08:11 | |
| Laney | oops, probably didn't mean to uncomment edubuntu :-) | 09:09 |
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson_ | ||
| === marcustomlinson_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| fossfreedom_ | jbicha: thanks - was aware of that issue for the yakkety gnome-control-center. Little surprised the GTK+3.24 gnome-control-center/libinput still having the same issues :/ | 09:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-65.86] (core, kernel) | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-65.86] | 11:32 | |
| ogra_ | can someone let snapd out of the unapproved queue on xenial ? | 12:19 |
| apw | ogra_, right now it is holding for a potential regression between it and apparmor | 12:22 |
| ogra_ | apw, thanks for the info | 12:22 |
| ogra_ | apw, any info what that regression is ? | 12:22 |
| apw | ogra_, hopefully the comment from me on the SRU bug says which bug we are waiting on | 12:23 |
| ogra_ | ah | 12:23 |
| apw | ogra_, oh yeah i even included the bug # | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | apw, yeah, i see it ... zyga has concerns though | 12:25 |
| zyga | apw: hey, I'm interested in the kernel regression and snapd | 12:25 |
| zyga | apw: jjohansen has informed me (also in the bug report) that this is not a regression but a feature | 12:26 |
| apw | ogra_, it looks from the last two comments he was happy | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: and that snapd should be updated to cope | 12:26 |
| apw | zyga, are you happy :) | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: not sure | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: it's raining, my mother in law is coming today and we have medium fire in snapd all over ;-) | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: seriously, not sure what to do yet | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: if the bug just affects classic + jailmode snaps the this is irrelevant | 12:26 |
| apw | with my "SRU member dealing with these snapd updates" hat on i think i am waiting for updates to snapd for all series z down | 12:26 |
| zyga | apw: if it affects more then we need to fix it in snapd and push this out ASAP | 12:26 |
| apw | zyga, well it is affecting your tests :) | 12:27 |
| zyga | apw: one specific test that checks a very niche usecase | 12:27 |
| zyga | apw: we also have a wide-spread problem that .6 is addressing | 12:27 |
| jjohansen | zyga: it potentially affects more, I can't say where it will surface | 12:27 |
| zyga | apw: I'd trade the wide spread problem for the niche one any day | 12:27 |
| zyga | jjohansen: I see | 12:27 |
| zyga | jjohansen: so the rule you mentioned should land to the base template | 12:27 |
| zyga | jjohansen: is it sufficient for libc or should we open up 'm' to all the thnigs in core? | 12:28 |
| apw | jjohansen, that is the one jamie suggests in comment #1 right ? | 12:28 |
| jjohansen | zyga: I am not sure, I would just go libc but I tend to be conservative | 12:28 |
| zyga | jjohansen: I see | 12:29 |
| zyga | jjohansen: I'll prepare a patch but we will also need to refresh all the profiles in snapd on startup | 12:29 |
| zyga | (like we do with seccomp now) | 12:29 |
| apw | jjohansen, have those changes been submitted for Y/X/T yet ? | 12:32 |
| jjohansen | apw: yes | 12:33 |
| jjohansen | apw: well not trusty, I need to look at its kernel more | 12:33 |
| apw | so i am reading that to say the current pending snapd in y/x/y are all only "as bad" as the one in -updates | 12:44 |
| jjohansen | sounds right | 12:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: chrome-gnome-shell (xenial-proposed/primary) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.1] | 13:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected chrome-gnome-shell [source] (xenial-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.0] | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chrome-gnome-shell [source] (xenial-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.1] | 13:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chrome-gnome-shell [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chrome-gnome-shell [source] (trusty-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu14.04.1] | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chrome-gnome-shell [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.1] | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chrome-gnome-shell [i386] (trusty-proposed/none) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu14.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chrome-gnome-shell [i386] (trusty-proposed) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu14.04.1] | 13:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.22.6] | 13:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.22.6~14.04] | 13:23 | |
| apw | ogra_, ok the old and new snapd will be equally affected by the incoming apparmor changes so i have accepted those snapd updates | 13:23 |
| ogra_ | zyga, ^^^ | 13:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [1.8.2+nmu1ubuntu1 => 1.8.2+nmu1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) | 13:32 | |
| === jamespage_ is now known as jamespage | ||
| zyga | apw: thank you | 13:57 |
| zyga | apw: I'm sure we'll work on 2.22.7 with a reaction to kernel changes | 13:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (xenial-proposed/multiverse) [1.8.2ubuntu1 => 1.8.2ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu3~14.04.1] | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-40.43] (core, kernel) | 19:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected thermald [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.5.3-5] | 19:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-40.43] | 19:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thermald (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.5.3-4 => 1.5.3-4ubuntu1] (core) | 19:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wget (xenial-proposed/main) [1.17.1-1ubuntu1.1 => 1.17.1-1ubuntu1.2] (core) | 20:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kexec-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:2.0.10-2ubuntu1 => 1:2.0.10-2ubuntu1.1] (core) | 21:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kexec-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.10-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.0.10-1ubuntu2.1] (core) | 21:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!