| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (trusty-proposed/main) [2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.1 => 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.2] (core) | 02:21 | |
| ginggs | how can a new package have an autopkgtest regression? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/ariba/zesty/amd64 | 06:18 |
|---|---|---|
| ginggs | weird, it's a build failure, but builds fine locally :( | 06:19 |
| apw | ginggs, well it is a self-test failure apparently because it is core-dumping | 07:41 |
| apw | ginggs, differnt compiler in zesty-proposed or something | 07:41 |
| ginggs | apw: it's been failing since October though - scratches head | 07:57 |
| apw | ginggs, it is possible a retry thinks they should be run when they should not | 08:01 |
| apw | Laney, any idea why we are running (and failing) ADT testing on ariba when it has no binaries | 08:01 |
| ginggs | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/ariba/zesty/amd64 shows a pass ??? 1.0.1-1 cd-hit/4.6.6-1 2016-08-04 21:29:51 UTC | 08:04 |
| ginggs | i received this email from launchpad https://paste.ubuntu.com/24094899/ - is there anything that can or should be done about it? it is unrelated to the memory leak that this upload fixed | 08:18 |
| Laney | apw: dunno, probably wouldn't have expected britney to request that test | 09:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.0 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [7.0.15-0ubuntu0.16.10.3] | 09:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.0.15-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] | 09:06 | |
| apw | Laney: could it be one of the rerun missing jobs perhaps | 09:08 |
| Laney | apw: nah, 2017-01-27/23:21:55.log.gz:I: [Fri Jan 27 23:37:22 2017] - Requesting ariba autopkgtest on amd64 to verify ariba/2.7.1+ds-1 | 09:15 |
| apw | that is bananas | 09:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pytest-qt (zesty-proposed/primary) [2.1.0-2] | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pytest-xvfb (zesty-proposed/primary) [1.0.0-2] | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-h5netcdf (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.3.1-1] | 09:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-xarray (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.9.1+ds1-1] | 09:25 | |
| ginggs | apw: re ariba: disabled tests, built in a PPA, downloaded and installed .deb, runs test suite locally just fine | 09:43 |
| ginggs | apw, Laney: i want to upload ariba ignoring the build-dtime test failures, are you still looking at the autopkgtest weirdness? do you want me to wait? | 09:55 |
| Laney | you want to ignore a binary which appears to be crashing? | 09:58 |
| ginggs | Laney, I built it in a PPA, downloaded the deb and it passes the autopkgtests | 09:59 |
| Laney | so why does it crash on the builder? | 09:59 |
| ginggs | Laney: nafc | 09:59 |
| Laney | hmmmm | 10:01 |
| Laney | ginggs: well I don't think it's a good idea personally, but it's your call at the end of the day | 10:07 |
| Laney | I might have a britney fix too | 10:07 |
| ginggs | Laney: a britney fix for? | 10:23 |
| Laney | requesting the tests when there are no binaries | 10:23 |
| Laney | pushed that | 10:28 |
| Laney | I think the test request should go away soon now | 10:28 |
| ginggs | Laney: we can test that - i can upload ariba 2.7.1+ds-1build1 with no changes | 10:39 |
| Laney | no need | 10:40 |
| Laney | it should just forget that one | 10:40 |
| ginggs | Laney: oh ok | 10:41 |
| fossfreedom_ | jbicha: is there a plan to uplift the version of GTK from 3.22.7 to 3.22.9 in zesty? Reason for the Q - 3.22.9 breaks Arc-Theme so I'm wondering if I should plan on submitting a patch to Arc Theme to fix the 3.22.9 breakage. | 10:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fglrx-installer (trusty-proposed/restricted) [2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.2 => 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fglrx-installer-updates (trusty-proposed/restricted) [2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.2 => 2:15.201-0ubuntu0.14.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.22.6 => 2.23] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.22.6+16.10 => 2.23+16.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 12:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.22.6~14.04 => 2.23~14.04] (no packageset) | 12:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvptx-tools (zesty-proposed/primary) [0.20170301-2] | 12:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-xvfb [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xarray [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.1+ds1-1] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-qt [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.0-2] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-h5netcdf [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.1-1] | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-recipes [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.16.0-0ubuntu1] | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytest-qt [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset) | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytest-xvfb [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xarray [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.9.1+ds1-1] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvptx-tools [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.20170301-2] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-h5netcdf [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 12:47 | |
| jbicha | fossfreedom_: yes, gtk3 is temporarily stuck in proposed because ubuntu-app-launch needs to not use upstart so it can build on s390x | 12:57 |
| fossfreedom_ | jbicha: thanks for the heads up. I'll prepare a patch for arc-theme | 12:58 |
| xnox | jbicha, which is proving to be a lot more work thatn originally forseen. | 12:58 |
| xnox | jbicha, can you build gtk3 without mir on s390x? | 12:58 |
| xnox | and hence without content-hub, ubuntu-app-launch, mir. | 12:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-xvfb [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xarray [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.1+ds1-1] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvptx-tools [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.20170301-2] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-h5netcdf [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.1-1] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-qt [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.0-2] | 13:02 | |
| jbicha | xnox: yes, but I'd like the Desktop team to approve that | 13:10 |
| xnox | jbicha, i'm sure they don't support mir on s390x =) | 13:11 |
| jbicha | xnox: could you reask in #ubuntu-desktop? | 13:11 |
| xnox | done | 13:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.27-8ubuntu2.1] | 13:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: giflib (trusty-proposed/main) [4.1.6-11 => 4.1.6-11ubuntu0.14.04.1] (core) | 13:27 | |
| fossfreedom_ | jbicha: another heads up - something from last nights 3.23.91 updates is crashing Ubuntu Budgie from launching any apps - the whole session dies. Currently suspect the mutter update. Investigating. | 13:55 |
| jbicha | fossfreedom_: nvidia drivers? | 13:59 |
| fossfreedom_ | no - crashing for me in virtualbox. just talking with a tester who is running on a physical thinkpad - I think that is intel | 14:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:8.3.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:9.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 15:25 | |
| fossfreedom_ | jbicha: any thoughts on this? yesterday uploaded was a new version of budgie-desktop - two patches. I've rebuilt the package without those two extra patches but it still crashes. If I install the budgie-desktop packages BEFORE yesterday all is well. Seems like its the recompilation against the new stuff that is causing issues. | 15:37 |
| fossfreedom_ | I've recompiled against all the packages in zesty-proposed. no joy | 15:39 |
| jgrimm | bdmurray, are you on SRU duty today? resolvconf in xenial-proposed needs released (the Yellow status bug in pending-sru is false positive, as no longer affects resolvconf). | 16:19 |
| jgrimm | or slangasek as having history with that one ^ | 16:20 |
| bdmurray | jgrimm: I am but we are in a meeting at the moment | 16:20 |
| jgrimm | np at all | 16:20 |
| jgrimm | and nice change to pending-sru page, i like it! | 16:21 |
| cyphermox | can someone please review/accept the network-manager-openvpn SRU for xenial? | 17:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maas (xenial-proposed/main) [2.1.3+bzr5573-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.1.4+bzr5591-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 17:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maas (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.1.3+bzr5573-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.1.4+bzr5591-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-server) | 17:15 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I'm inclined to accept thermald without the DEP3 headers as I think the bug reference in debian changelog is good enough for an SRU. | 17:24 |
| bdmurray | jgrimm: Is somebody going to verify the Yakkety version of resolvconf? | 17:28 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: s/inclined/going/ | 17:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.5.3-4ubuntu1] | 17:29 | |
| jgrimm | bdmurray, yes I believe that should happen yet (rharper?) | 17:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kexec-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:2.0.10-2ubuntu1.1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kexec-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.10-1ubuntu2.1] | 17:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted coreutils [source] (yakkety-proposed) [8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10] | 18:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted coreutils [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.25-2ubuntu3~16.04] | 18:02 | |
| santa_ | dear release wizards, | 18:10 |
| santa_ | we have been inspecting the status of okular and calligra migration from -proposed | 18:11 |
| santa_ | calligra right now provides okular-backend-odp and okular-backend-odt | 18:12 |
| santa_ | both have | 18:12 |
| santa_ | Recommends: okular | 18:12 |
| santa_ | and | 18:13 |
| santa_ | Enhances: okular | 18:13 |
| santa_ | from the proposed migration raw output: | 18:13 |
| santa_ | trying: okular | 18:14 |
| santa_ | skipped: okular (0, 10, 6) | 18:14 |
| santa_ | got: 66+0: a-23:a-7:a-7:i-10:p-5:s-14 | 18:14 |
| santa_ | * amd64: okular-backend-odp, okular-backend-odt, okular-mobile | 18:14 |
| santa_ | ↑ is the recommends or the enhances what is triggering the blocking? | 18:14 |
| santa_ | or is something else that I'm missing? | 18:14 |
| nacc | santa_: i believe that is saying if okular were to migrate, okular-backend-odb and okular-backend-odt and okular-mobile become uninstallable on amd64? | 18:15 |
| acheronuk | santa_: a KF5 okular would break the okular plugins of KDE4 calligra. | 18:16 |
| apw | sounds like those use libraries from okular, so need rebuilding on top, something like that | 18:16 |
| santa_ | ok | 18:16 |
| apw | santa_, normally i would then download the source for one of those and see if it does that | 18:17 |
| santa_ | yeah I think nacc got the answer, those okular backends are built using okular-dev | 18:19 |
| acheronuk | the calligra in proposed is now KF5 and has had it plugins rebuilt against the new KF5 okular | 18:19 |
| santa_ | yes | 18:19 |
| acheronuk | they need to migrate together. this time anyway. | 18:20 |
| santa_ | so we got a problem with calligra, and it's that is not migrating because of gcc-6 I presume at some point this would be fixed? because okular was @ -proposed as valid candidate for a while now | 18:21 |
| santa_ | and to be more specific the problem is this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/s390x/calligrasheets/1:3.0.0.1-0ubuntu2 | 18:23 |
| santa_ | libgcc1 (>= 1:6.3.0-5ubuntu1) | 18:26 |
| apw | yeah it is tied to gcc-6 which may or may not migrate | 18:26 |
| santa_ | that's higher than the version out of -proprosed | 18:27 |
| santa_ | so do you have any suggestion to deal with this? | 18:27 |
| apw | well we need to get gcc-6 to migrate, someone need to look at why it is not | 18:27 |
| acheronuk | I note that there have been a fir few gcc-6 and binutils uploads, which just fail each time on the same tests | 18:28 |
| santa_ | failing autopkgtest on linux apparently | 18:28 |
| santa_ | also note that there are other archs which doesn't have a depend so strict https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/amd64/calligrasheets/1:3.0.0.1-0ubuntu2 | 18:29 |
| nacc | i believe this is a known issue with the linux test and mismatches | 18:29 |
| apw | if it is just those, if that is the armhf thing with 'error: not found' | 18:29 |
| nacc | i saw some discussion of it before, at least | 18:29 |
| nacc | "ERROR: running version does not match source package" | 18:29 |
| santa_ | so I presume the only option is to wait for gcc migration to be fixed, or is there any possible workaround? | 18:30 |
| apw | nacc, oh that might just need rerunning with -proposed | 18:30 |
| apw | enabled or with the kernel as trigger too | 18:30 |
| nacc | apw: yeah, i think that's true -- not sure why it passed onthe other archs | 18:30 |
| apw | which arch failed ? | 18:30 |
| nacc | amd64 | 18:31 |
| nacc | ah i think i see why | 18:31 |
| nacc | whenever the amd64 test ran, 4.10.0.11 was in proposed | 18:31 |
| nacc | but for the other arches, it wasn't (afaict) | 18:31 |
| acheronuk | binutils was also filing against linux for a long time. I see there is a new upload of that today, but not sure that will pass. and that holds back gcc-6 if it fails | 18:32 |
| nacc | err, 4.10.0-11 that is | 18:33 |
| acheronuk | *failing | 18:33 |
| nacc | apw: are you retrying those? | 18:33 |
| apw | nacc, that has -signed so it might take a bit longer to get to the pocket safely | 18:33 |
| nacc | apw: ack | 18:33 |
| apw | nacc, i am trying to sort out a snapd fire, so if you could restart them i'd appreciate not thinking about it | 18:34 |
| nacc | apw: yep, doing it now | 18:34 |
| santa_ | thank you very much for digging into it | 18:36 |
| santa_ | while I'm here I would to ask other question | 18:36 |
| santa_ | recently I made some stuff to track the status of kde's packaging migrations | 18:37 |
| santa_ | is there a better way to get the information from the update excuses page other than parsing the html page? | 18:37 |
| santa_ | (that's what I'm doing right now, because, apparenly that's what grep-excuses from debian does) | 18:38 |
| santa_ | but suggestions are welcomed | 18:38 |
| apw | santa_, there is .yaml version of that same page, which most sensible things parse against | 18:39 |
| apw | well load and sift through | 18:39 |
| nacc | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.yaml | 18:40 |
| nacc | santa_: --^ | 18:40 |
| santa_ | apw, nacc: parsing the yaml should be better, thanks, fyi what I'm working is on python code to provide things like this: http://gpul.grupos.udc.es/ka-iron-hand_reports/plasma_archive/5.9.3_zesty_proposed_migration.pdf | 18:49 |
| santa_ | or this http://gpul.grupos.udc.es/ka-iron-hand_reports/applications_archive/16.12.1_zesty_proposed_migration.pdf | 18:49 |
| santa_ | an edge a -> b means b build depends on any of the binary packages provided by a | 18:49 |
| santa_ | if we finally file an FFE for kdepim we hope this kind of information is useful for us and for you | 18:50 |
| santa_ | the apps one could give you a hint about new reviewing order | 18:51 |
| nacc | santa_: the picture is nice, although i think of the arrows in the opposite direction (without changing their meaning :) | 18:58 |
| santa_ | nacc: haha, yeah that's in the eye of the beholder I guess, I think more about the meaning of the arrows as "building will go in this order" | 19:00 |
| nacc | santa_: makes sense | 19:00 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: ok, sure | 19:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.23+16.10] | 19:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.23] | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-gnome-meta (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.58.2 => 0.58.3] (ubuntugnome) | 19:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-gnome-meta (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.71 => 0.71.1] (ubuntugnome) | 19:21 | |
| jbicha | bdmurray: could you accept the ubuntu-gnome-meta SRUs ^ since I'd like to have them in -updates by next week? | 19:27 |
| bdmurray | jbicha: I don't know without reviewing them. ;-) | 19:29 |
| jbicha | :) | 19:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.1.0~bzr470-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] | 19:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.0~bzr470-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 19:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.71.1] | 20:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.58.3] | 20:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mimedefang [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.78-1ubuntu1.1] | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exiv2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.25-2.1ubuntu16.04.1] | 20:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-weather [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.1-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 20:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted imagej [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.50d+dfsg-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-recipes [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 22:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maas (trusty-proposed/main) [1.9.4+bzr4592-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 => 1.9.5+bzr4599-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 22:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.11.8-0ubuntu0.5] | 23:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted giflib [source] (trusty-proposed) [4.1.6-11ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 23:04 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!