[04:09] <robot> social
[04:09] <robot> -ize
[10:40] <padraic> Hi folks, someone has a question about using their microSD card here http://askubuntu.com/questions/888360/bq-aquaris-m10-fhd-ubuntu-edition-how-do-i-see-the-size-of-external-storage-ie
[10:40] <padraic> I wonder if anyone knows whether this should work in nautilus? I don't have an SD card to check.
[11:03] <Mirv> oSoMoN: should I be worried at stuff like https://launchpadlibrarian.net/309392171/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-i386.webbrowser-app_0.23+16.04.20170125.1-0ubuntu2~~xenialoverlay1~1_BUILDING.txt.gz ? same for armhf, although "fixed" by the second rebuild attempt
[11:04] <oSoMoN> Mirv, not if it goes away with one rebuild
[11:08] <Mirv> oSoMoN: does two rebuilds count :) dunno really, this is the attempt nr. 853 at getting the arm64 new kernel support changes into stable+overlay. these will be part of 5.6.3 eventually later this year but we had again brokenness some days ago when kernel was updated so I thought to try.
[11:08] <Mirv> it seems much better cherry-picking on top of 5.6.2 than it did on top of 5.6.1 - there are only handful of commits between 5.6.2 release and these being committed to the 5.6 branch
[11:08] <oSoMoN> Mirv, sounds worth it
[11:09] <Mirv> this webbrowser flakiness is the only problematic symptom seen, and seems to work ok on my frieza_arm64 and desktop
[11:09] <oSoMoN> Mirv, flakiness in webbrowser-app tests is not unheard of, so if it goes away after 2 rebuild attempts you should be safe
[11:09] <Mirv> ok
[11:10] <Mirv> also only armhf and i386, others were fine on first pass including arm64 itself
[11:12] <Mirv> note that I'm only test rebuilding these, they are not needed for the landing itself
[15:28] <daker> ogra_: hi do you know if who still works on the oxide-eglfs (kiosk) ?
[15:29] <ogra_> daker, nope, no idea, perhaps chrisccoulson knows
[15:31] <daker> ogra_: ok thanks!