[00:19] cyphermox: I spoke too soon -- returned home from shopping to find it frozen again [00:19] :( [00:20] valorie-GT60-2PC': Running inside KDE Plasma 5.9.2 on Ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus) powered by Linux 4.10.0-9-generic, CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4810MQ CPU @ 2.80GHz at 1899/3800 MHz, RAM: 2620/24027 MB [00:20] plenty of memory here, and plasma runs flawlessly until the freeze [00:21] fooey === mwsb is now known as chuuu === chuuu is now known as chu === pavlushka is now known as whizzkid === whizzkid is now known as pavlushka === maclin1 is now known as maclin === n1ce_ is now known as n1ce [09:06] sil2100: G'morning! How's the thunar SRU looking? [09:06] Unit193: morning! All good, will publish it in a few minutes! [09:06] Just need to wake up [09:06] \o/ [09:07] Hah, get some good coffee. We were just trying to make sure it gets in well before our Trusty EOL. [10:20] pitti: want to try resubmitting a systemd request? [10:20] I just built some bodged up adt images [10:27] Laney: ♥ [10:28] Laney: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5528 is running from 20 mins ago, that might just have missed it [10:28] Laney: I'll retry that one if/after it fails [10:29] depends if it hit lcy01/amd64 :P [10:29] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5529 is from 6 mins ago, that should have caught it [10:29] ok, nice [10:30] Laney: I'll retry https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5510 now, that already failed (yesterday-ish) [10:31] pitti: 5528 seems to be building [10:31] so that's past where it would have broken already [10:31] nice! [10:31] IIUC [10:31] yeah, it would have failed early, during setup-commands [10:31] i386/lgw01 amd64 came a bit later [10:32] -y --allow-downgrades FTW [10:33] Laney: so we published a kernel update, the daily cloud images grabbed it, then we pulled the kernel update? [10:33] right [10:33] "nice" timing [10:33] then you couldn't install linux-* because of the = depends [10:33] thanks for debugging that [10:34] np, I knew it had happened so it didn't take me long to connect once I saw a failing log [10:36] Laney: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/5528 i386 failed; I think that's the one that missed your update by a few minutes, retrying [10:36] nod [11:22] smoser, xe-daemon.service has weird stanzas w.r.t. cloud-init units and it ends up a dependency loop. [11:22] Before=network.target cloud-init.service cloud-init-local.service seems wrong to me [11:22] i would have thought it should be After=cloud-config.target Wants=cloud-config.target instead === hikiko is now known as hikiko|bbl === _salem is now known as salem_ === marcoceppi_ is now known as marcoceppi === powersj` is now known as powersj === boiko_ is now known as boiko [14:23] xnox, did you get sorted on that ? [14:24] somewhat [14:25] smoser, i think xe-daemon encodes correctly everything it needs without cloud-init as well. [14:25] but i will test that out [14:27] xnox, it quite possibly does. [14:27] josvaz, was just not interested in pushing an sru at that point. === hikiko|bbl is now known as hikiko\ [15:01] Sorry If I ask the same question again: is there a way to make sbuild ignore checksum of sources inside a .dsc? [15:14] LocutusOfBorg: hi, what's up with virtualbox autopkgtests failing? [15:14] looking [15:15] apw, please merge virtualbox kernel drivers? ^^ [15:16] tjaalton, seems that the kernel module is already provided in the driver itself, so installing the dkms package is useless [15:16] usually kernel people were behind virtualbox version, so the dkms packages was overriding the kernel one [15:16] right now this isn't the case [15:17] ok [15:18] the dkms failure was seen on erlier tests too that passed iirc [15:19] tjaalton, that is one of those where i need to fix the tests to understand that the kernel also has versions of the driver [15:20] if the error is "already installed" it should be ignorable [15:24] ah ok === hikiko\ is now known as hikiko [16:40] rbasak: around? [16:56] nacc: o/ [16:56] rbasak: wondered if you had some time to talk about the -devel pointers? [16:57] Sure! [16:57] rbasak: HO ok? [16:57] Yeah. Two minutes please. [16:57] rbasak: of course [17:14] hi all, how can i have two machines that are updating from the same repo (an internal repo), new ones show 14.04.5 and old ones show 14.04.3 ? kernel is the same... what package is making this change ? [17:37] forehelp: wrong channel? [17:38] nacc: yes sorry i asked on the right one === ejat_ is now known as ejat === hikiko_ is now known as hikiko === Dmitrii-Sh_ is now known as Dmitrii-Sh === wolsen_ is now known as wolsen === tarpman_ is now known as tarpman === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars === maxb_ is now known as maxb === apw_ is now known as apw === karstensrage_ is now known as karstensrage === infinity1 is now known as infinity === bigon_ is now known as bigon === JanC_ is now known as JanC === BrAsS_mOnKeY is now known as g2 === josepht` is now known as josepht === salem_` is now known as _salem [23:17] infinity: slangasek: similar to the server amd64,i386 ISOs, can we get our automated tests blocking the release of those for ppc64el as well? [23:42] hi, can someone be kind enough to see if ubuntu kernel 3.16.x series has the intel i219-lm network driver? Thanks a lot [23:45] or, how can I see if the intel e1000 loaded driver has such support? [23:48] bulletxt|2: if I'm reading this correctly, that kernel hasn't had any updates since july https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-utopic [23:49] ok but [23:49] does it have support for the driver? sarnold [23:49] how can I discover this info? [23:49] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.16.40/ [23:50] ah here we go, here's the git tree http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-utopic.git/ [23:50] they apparently move the no-longer-supported ones to ubuntu-archive [23:51] oh hrm that .. looks too old. [23:52] sarnold: I just need to know if the driver is included in the 3.16 series [23:52] how can I discover this? [23:55] bulletxt|2: looks like, using the most recent 3.16 tag and searching the tree, there's e1000e http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-utopic.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel?h=Ubuntu-3.16.0-44.59 [23:55] looks like support has existed in that driver since 2012 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=2fbe4526e5aafc9ffa5d85fa4749a7c5b22af6b2 [23:56] wxl: no [23:56] its not i217 [23:56] its i219 [23:56] which came out in 2015 [23:56] i quote "e1000e: initial support for i217" [23:57] in my case the card is i219-lm [23:57] ah [23:58] can you check when that has been added in the official linux kernel? I guess its 4.0 series [23:58] Looking at http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/E1000E.html seems to indicate the first upstream kernel to support it (device: 156f) is the 4.1 kernel