[00:00] <jjohansen> bjf: yeah looking
[00:08] <jsalisbury> bjf, jjohansen, this one sticks out from a quick look: 
[00:08] <jsalisbury> d6d69ebc5b3f UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: Fix no_new_privs blocking change_onexec when using stacked namespaces
[00:11] <jjohansen> jsalisbury: well thats a big nasty one but by the call trace it actually looks more likely to do with
[00:11] <jjohansen>   UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix lock ordering for mkdir
[00:11] <jjohansen> or
[00:11] <jjohansen>   UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix leak on securityfs pin count
[00:11] <jjohansen> or
[00:11] <jjohansen>   UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix reference count leak when securityfs_setup_d_inode() fails
[00:11] <jjohansen> or
[00:11] <jjohansen>   UBUNTU: SAUCE: apparmor: fix not handling error case when securityfs_pin_fs() fails
[00:12] <jsalisbury> ugg
[16:56] <JokesOnYou77> Hi all
[16:57] <JokesOnYou77> I'm trying to understand the difference between the *-edge kernels and those that don't have that designation.  Based on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/RollingLTSEnablementStack I thought the *-edge kernels should be newer, but from what I can see in pat it looks like linux-generic-hwe-16.04 is 4.8.0.39.10 while *-edge is 4.8.0.34.6
[17:09] <apw> JokesOnYou77, -edge is typically newer, the whole -hwe -hwe-edge is new and we're just getting -edge rebased to 4.10 atm
[17:10] <JokesOnYou77> apw: Thanks!  I'll go with the regular one for now and see if it fixes my issues.