[12:02] <oSoMoN> Mirv, have you tried building oxide against Qt 5.8 yet? you may be interested by (or may want to comment on) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1669753
[12:03] <oSoMoN> (I haven’t looked into it at all, just thought you’d be interested)
[12:06] <Mirv> oSoMoN: no, I don't have 5.8 brewing even. upstream is not going to do 5.8.1 release so it may make sense to skip the whole 5.8 and hope that 5.9.0 is good enough for 17.10 (5.9.1 will not be around on time)
[12:06] <Mirv> 5.8 is a bit of a dead-end right now
[12:28] <oSoMoN> Mirv, ack, thanks
[14:17] <mterry> tedg: you are an admin for ~unity-api-team, which is the bug subscriber of record for unity-scope-mediascanner.  Would you be willing to subscribe that team to mediascanner2 as well?
[14:37] <dobey> mterry: i thought there was another specific team that was something -bugs which we subscribed to things
[14:38] <mterry> dobey: there are several teams that the QA team's script looks at: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/view/head:/package-subscribers#L107
[14:38] <dobey> mterry: https://launchpad.net/~unity-api-bugs
[14:39] <dobey> huh
[14:39] <mterry> dobey: some teams prefer to use a -bugs team like that for the QA bit, some like to use the main team (I prefer it if they use main team, since -bugs can be a graveyard of no eyeballs sometimes)
[14:42] <dobey> yeah, i would prefer to not spam everyone with bug mail.
[14:43] <dobey> but a team to catch the bug mail that nobody is subscribed to, is not helpful either
[14:46] <mterry> That's what filters are for!  :)  Spamming people makes it opt-out-with-filters to ignore bug email rather than opt-in to a team just for bugs, which few probably will.  But ultimately the team decides which approach they want
[14:47] <dobey> yes, and that's why it pretty much all ends up in /dev/null
[14:48] <mterry> Well I hope not, anyone working on Ubuntu has to have some pretty intense email filters for basic sanity.  Presumably they filter them in a sensible way rather than just binning everything from LP  :)
[14:49] <dobey> it is impossible to filter things in a sensible way, when one receives so much bug spam
[14:50] <dobey> procmailrc is not an AI
[14:50] <dobey> :)
[14:51] <mterry> No but you can do sensible things like have a folder for new bugs in projects you care about.  That seems like pretty basic maintainership stuff.  Someone has to triage that junk
[14:52] <dobey> it's not that simple. even in projects i care about, all bug mail is not relevant to me
[15:22] <dobey> mterry: launchpad says it is subscribed?
[15:22] <dobey> weird
[15:22] <dobey> oh it is now
[15:23] <dobey> meh
[15:35] <mterry> tedg hooked me up
[19:24] <Nyxus> Does anyone know what the supported file systems are for sd cards on the phone?
[19:28] <dobey> Nyxus: vfat (not exfat) is the only one that gets auto-mounted i think
[19:44] <Nyxus> dobey: Cool! thanks for the info.
[21:32] <teve> kais tommoset simppelit laskutoimitkse
[21:33] <teve> sorry
[22:12] <garybot> has anyone tried out ubuntu touch on one plus 2 yet?
[22:14] <dobey> garybot: devices.ubports.com shows its status as "0%" for development done
[22:14] <dobey> so i suppose likely not
[22:15] <garybot> yeah... i saw that page..
[22:15] <garybot> it broke my heart :p
[22:16] <garybot> anyway it also says under development so hopefully soon